Skip to main content

Case information

Conduct a refined search of the Supreme Court of Canada database to obtain details on the status of a matter before the Court.


35841

Hugo Michel Nicolas Kotar v. Elizabeth Jane Lightle

(British Columbia) (Civil) (By Leave)

Docket

Judgments on applications for leave to appeal are rendered by the Court, but are not necessarily unanimous.

List of proceedings
Date Proceeding Filed By
(if applicable)
2014-09-29 Close file on Leave
2014-09-26 Copy of formal judgment sent to Registrar of the Court of Appeal and all parties
2014-09-26 Judgment on leave sent to the parties
2014-09-25 Judgment of the Court on the application for leave to appeal, The application for leave to appeal from the judgment of the Court of Appeal for British Columbia (Vancouver), Number CA040271, 2014 BCCA 69, dated February 21, 2014, is dismissed with costs.
Dismissed, with costs
2014-07-14 All materials on application for leave submitted to the Judges, Abe Ro Mo
2014-06-24 Order on motion to extend time
2014-06-24 Decision on motion to extend time, to serve and file a reply to the response to the application for leave to appeal to June 3, 2014, Reg
Granted
2014-06-24 Submission of motion to extend time, Reg
2014-06-04 Motion to extend time, (Letter Form), to serve and file reply, Completed on: 2014-06-04, (Printed version filed on 2014-06-04) Hugo Michel Nicolas Kotar
2014-06-03 Applicant's reply to respondent's argument, (Book Form), Service and motion for extension of time missing (rec'd 2014-06-04), Completed on: 2014-06-03, (Electronic version filed on 2014-06-03) Hugo Michel Nicolas Kotar
2014-05-21 Certificate (on limitations to public access) Elizabeth Jane Lightle
2014-05-21 Respondent's response on the application for leave to appeal, (Book Form), Completed on: 2014-05-21 Elizabeth Jane Lightle
2014-05-12 Correspondence received from, Applicant re: return of the CA order form Hugo Michel Nicolas Kotar
2014-04-22 Letter acknowledging receipt of an incomplete application for leave to appeal and without formal Court of Appeal order
2014-04-17 Certificate (on limitations to public access) Hugo Michel Nicolas Kotar
2014-04-17 Application for leave to appeal, (Book Form), Service (rec'd 2014-04-22), Final CA order missing (rec'd 2014-09-08), Completed on: 2014-09-09, (Electronic version filed on 2014-04-17) Hugo Michel Nicolas Kotar

Parties

Please note that in the case of closed files, the “Status” column reflects the status of the parties at the time of the proceedings. For more information about the proceedings and about the dates when the file was open, please consult the docket of the case in question.

Main parties

Main parties - Appellants
Name Role Status
Kotar, Hugo Michel Nicolas Applicant Active

v.

Main parties - Respondents
Name Role Status
Lightle, Elizabeth Jane Respondent Active

Counsel

Party: Kotar, Hugo Michel Nicolas

Counsel
Ian B. Hayward
Hayward & Sheppard
3220 - 666 Burrard Street
Vancouver, British Columbia
V6C 2X8
Telephone: (604) 689-3773
FAX: (604) 689-3993
Email: ihayward@haywardsheppard.com
Agent
Moira Dillon
Supreme Law Group
900 - 275 Slater Street
Ottawa, Ontario
K1P 5H9
Telephone: (613) 691-1224
FAX: (613) 691-1338
Email: mdillon@supremelawgroup.ca

Party: Lightle, Elizabeth Jane

Counsel
Lorne N. MacLean, Q.C.
MacLean Family Law Group
1075 West Georgia Street
Suite 2010
Vancouver, British Columbia
V6E 3C9
Telephone: (604) 602-9000 Ext: 224
FAX: (604) 682-0556
Email: lorne@bcfamilylaw.ca

Summary

Keywords

None.

Summary

Case summaries are prepared by the Office of the Registrar of the Supreme Court of Canada (Law Branch). Please note that summaries are not provided to the Judges of the Court. They are placed on the Court file and website for information purposes only.


Family law – Family assets – Division – Valuation – Book of business – Whether a “book of business” arising out of a spouse’s employment as an investment advisor is family property, and if so, whether and how to determine and realize its value – Whether a party who fails to introduce admissible expert opinion evidence as to the value of property at trial should be granted a “second trial” to introduce such evidence – Whether fictional assumption imposed for the purpose of valuation is supportable at law and in fact – Whether the purpose of family law legislation in British Columbia is to address the disproportionate effects of marriage upon the ability of child-rearing spouses to become independent following the dissolution of marriage.

The parties married in 2000. Ms. Lightle worked in publishing and Mr. Kotar worked as an investment advisor in the securities industry. Their first child was born in 2006 and the second was born in 2009. Ms. Lightle left her full-time employment to allow her to care for the children. She then pursued freelance work and started a small publishing business. In 2000, Mr. Kotar purchased a “book of business” from a retiring investment advisor with a loan of $175,000. The amount of assets under his management fluctuated over the years from $20,000,000 to $57,000,000. The parties separated in 2011. At the time of trial, Mr. Kotar’s income had been adversely affected by a number of factors, including the loss of certain clients so that the assets under his management had decreased. Mr. Kotar was also facing a lawsuit with a claim for $400,000 against him. The parties’ assets at the date of trial were the family home, investments, RRSPs, vehicles and Mr. Kotar’s book of business.

Lower court rulings

September 17, 2012
Supreme Court of British Columbia

E093946, 2012 BCSC 1363

Spousal and child support ordered for respondent; Equal division of family assets; Unequal division of applicant’s contingent liability; Applicant’s book of business asset not a family asset available for division

February 21, 2014
Court of Appeal for British Columbia (Vancouver)

CA040271, 2014 BCCA 69

Respondent’s appeal allowed: Spousal and child support increased; Equal division of contingent liability and book of business; Valuation of book of business remitted to trial judge

Memorandums of argument on application for leave to appeal

The memorandums of argument on an application for leave to appeal will be posted here 30 days after leave to appeal has been granted unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of the memorandum by filing out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.

If you have questions about a memorandum of argument or want to use a memorandum of argument, please contact the author of the memorandum of argument directly. Their name appears at the end of the memorandum of argument. The contact information for counsel is found in the “Counsel” tab of this page.

Downloadable PDFs

Not available

Factums on appeal

The factums of the appellant, the respondent and the intervener will be posted here at least 2 weeks before the hearing unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of factums by filling out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.

If you have questions about a factum or want permission to use a factum, please contact the author of the factum directly. Their contact information appears on the first page of each factum.

Downloadable PDFs

Not available

Webcasts

Not available.

Date modified: 2025-02-27