Case information
Consult our database for details on a Supreme Court of Canada case.
38978
Dahir Mohamed v. Farhiyo Tahlil Farah
(Ontario) (Civil) (By Leave)
Docket
Judgments on applications for leave to appeal are rendered by the Court, but are not necessarily unanimous.
| Date | Proceeding | Filed By (if applicable) |
|---|---|---|
| 2020-12-01 | Close file on Leave | |
| 2020-12-01 | Correspondence (sent by the Court) to, Mr. Dahir Mohamed, from the Acting Registrar, RE: reconsideration not accepted for filing | |
| 2020-12-01 | Reconsideration not accepted for filing, by Acting Registrar | |
| 2020-04-03 |
Motion for reconsideration of the application for leave to appeal, (Book Form), MISSING: Proof of Service on the respondent (confirmed by email) Filing fee will not be collected at the moment due to Covid restrictions, Incomplete |
Dahir Mohamed |
| 2020-03-13 | Copy of formal judgment sent to Registrar of the Court of Appeal and all parties | |
| 2020-03-13 | Judgment on leave sent to the parties | |
| 2020-03-12 |
Judgment of the Court on the application for leave to appeal, The various requests for miscellaneous relief are dismissed. The application for leave to appeal from the judgment of the Court of Appeal for Ontario, Number C66662, 2019 ONCA 620, dated July 18, 2019, is dismissed. Dismissed |
|
| 2020-02-03 | All materials on application for leave submitted to the Judges, for consideration by the Court | |
| 2020-01-22 | Correspondence received from, (Letter Form), Letter from Scocco Law Professional Corporation saying that they had been retained by the applicant to provided all the missing documents of the application. | Dahir Mohamed |
| 2020-01-21 | Certificate (on limitations to public access), (Letter Form) | Farhiyo Tahlil Farah |
| 2020-01-21 | Respondent's response on the application for leave to appeal, (Letter Form), Completed on: 2020-01-21 | Farhiyo Tahlil Farah |
| 2019-12-23 | Letter advising parties of an incomplete application for leave to appeal, FILE OPENED 12/23/19 | |
| 2019-09-18 | Letter acknowledging receipt of an application for leave to appeal | |
| 2019-09-09 | Certificate (on limitations to public access), (Included in the application for leave to appeal), Public Acces to Information Form | Dahir Mohamed |
| 2019-09-09 |
Application for leave to appeal, (Book Form), Missing: -Amended covers (rec'd 2020-01-22) -Filing Fee (rec'd 2020-01-22) -Trial Court reasons for judgment (rec'd 2020-01-22) -CA order (rec'd 2020-01-22) -Amended Notice, SIGNED (rec'd 2020-01-22) -Amended application rec'd 2020-01-27, Completed on: 2020-02-04 |
Dahir Mohamed |
Parties
Please note that in the case of closed files, the “Status” column reflects the status of the parties at the time of the proceedings. For more information about the proceedings and about the dates when the file was open, please consult the docket of the case in question.
Main parties
| Name | Role | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Mohamed, Dahir | Applicant | Active |
v.
| Name | Role | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Farah, Farhiyo Tahlil | Respondent | Active |
Counsel
Party: Mohamed, Dahir
This party is not represented by counsel.
Party: Farah, Farhiyo Tahlil
Counsel
400 - 1565 Carling Ave
Ottawa, Ontario
K1Z 8R1
Telephone: (613) 236-9442 Ext: 184
FAX: (613) 236-7942
Email: eyoung@lmrlawyers.com
Summary
Keywords
Family law — Custody and access — Custody of three children awarded to mother — Father granted supervised access rights — Father’s appeal of custody and access orders dismissed as meritless, given lack of complete record — Father’s further appeal to Court of Appeal dismissed — Whether children have statutory right to have unimpeded access to parents — Whether parents have duty to be truthful and candid and not to engage in fraudulent misrepresentations about children to mislead courts — Whether courts have statutory or common law duties or obligations to cite parent for contempt of court if parent misrepresented material facts about children and other parent to obtain custody and child support — Family Law Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. F. 3, s. 49(1) — Children’s Law Reform Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. C 12.
Summary
Case summaries are prepared by the Office of the Registrar of the Supreme Court of Canada (Law Branch). Please note that summaries are not provided to the Judges of the Court. They are placed on the Court file and website for information purposes only.
The applicant father, Mr. Dahir Mohamed, and the respondent mother, Ms. Farhiyo Tahill Farah, have three children. Between 2010 and 2018, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice issued four family law orders relating to custody and access for the three children, ultimately resulting in the mother having sole custody of the children, with supervised access rights for the father.
The applicant father sought to challenge all four orders. His appeal from all four orders was dismissed by Justice De Sousa of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice on February 28, 2019, who found that the appeal had no merit, based on the incomplete state of the record. A further appeal to the Ontario Court of Appeal was dismissed unanimously on July 18, 2019 (with written reasons provided on July 22, 2019).
Lower court rulings
Ontario Superior Court of Justice
FC-18-1418
Mr. Mohamed’s appeal from four prior family law orders relating to custody and access — dismissed.
Court of Appeal for Ontario
C66662, 2019 ONCA 620
Mr. Mohamed’s further appeal — dismissed
Filed documents
The memorandums of argument on an application for leave to appeal will be posted here 30 days after leave to appeal has been granted unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of the memorandum by filling out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613-996-8666 or at 1-844-365-9662.
If you have questions about a memorandum of argument or want to use a memorandum of argument, please contact the author of the memorandum of argument directly. Their name appears at the end of the memorandum of argument. The contact information for counsel is found in the “Counsel” tab of this page.
Downloadable PDFs
Not available
Related links
The factums of the appellant, the respondent and the intervener will be posted here at least 2 weeks before the hearing unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of factums by filling out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613-996-8666 or at 1-844-365-9662.
If you have questions about a factum or want permission to use a factum, please contact the author of the factum directly. Their contact information appears on the first page of each factum.
Downloadable PDFs
Not available
Related links
The condensed books of the appellant, the respondent and the intervener will be posted here upon receipt of the electronic version, 2 days prior to the scheduled appeal hearing. You may also obtain copies of condensed books by filling out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613-996-8666 or at 1-844-365-9662.
If you have questions about a condensed book or want permission to use a condensed book, please contact the author of the condensed book directly. Their contact information appears on the first page of each condensed book.
Downloadable PDFs
Not available