Skip to main content

Case information

Consult our database for details on a Supreme Court of Canada case.


37996

Thanh Truc Truong v. Her Majesty the Queen

(Federal) (Civil) (By Leave)

Docket

Judgments on applications for leave to appeal are rendered by the Court, but are not necessarily unanimous.

List of proceedings
Date Proceeding Filed By
(if applicable)
2019-05-08 Close file on Leave
2019-05-08 Certificate of taxation issued to, Laurent Bartleman
2019-05-08 Decision on the bill of costs, in the amount of $1,126.42, Reg
2019-05-08 Submission of the bill of costs, Reg
2019-03-18 Bill of costs, (Letter Form), Completed on: 2019-03-18 Her Majesty the Queen
2018-10-19 Copy of formal judgment sent to Registrar of the Court of Appeal and all parties
2018-10-19 Judgment on leave sent to the parties
2018-10-18 Judgment of the Court on the application for leave to appeal,
The application for leave to appeal from the judgment of the Federal Court of Appeal, Number A-92-17, 2018 FCA 6, dated January 11, 2018, is dismissed with costs.
Dismissed, with costs
2018-09-17 All materials on application for leave submitted to the Judges, for consideration by the Court
2018-04-13 Certificate (on limitations to public access), (Letter Form) Her Majesty the Queen
2018-04-13 Notice of name, (Letter Form) Her Majesty the Queen
2018-04-13 Respondent's response on the application for leave to appeal, (Book Form), Completed on: 2018-04-13 Her Majesty the Queen
2018-03-15 Letter acknowledging receipt of a complete application for leave to appeal, FILE OPENED ON MARCH 15, 2018.
2018-03-12 Certificate (on limitations to public access), (Included in the application for leave to appeal) Thanh Truc Truong
2018-03-12 Application for leave to appeal, (Book Form), Completed on: 2018-03-12 Thanh Truc Truong

Parties

Please note that in the case of closed files, the “Status” column reflects the status of the parties at the time of the proceedings. For more information about the proceedings and about the dates when the file was open, please consult the docket of the case in question.

Main parties

Main parties - Appellants
Name Role Status
Truong, Thanh Truc Applicant Active

v.

Main parties - Respondents
Name Role Status
Her Majesty the Queen Respondent Active

Counsel

Party: Truong, Thanh Truc

Counsel
Name
Sunita D. Doobay
Contact information
TaxChambers LLP
155 University Avenue
Suite 300
Toronto, Ontario
M5H 3B7
Telephone: (416) 847-7300
FAX: (866) 285-6527
Email: sunita.doobay@taxchambers.ca

Party: Her Majesty the Queen

Counsel
Name
Sharon Lee
Contact information
Attorney General of Canada
Department of Justice Canada
130 King Street West, Suite 3400
Toronto, Ontario
M5X 1K6
Telephone: (416) 973-0499
FAX: (416) 973-0810
Email: sharon.lee@justice.gc.ca
Agent
Name
Christopher M. Rupar
Contact information
Attorney General of Canada
Department of Justice Canada, Civil Litigation Section
50 O'Connor Street, 5th Floor
Ottawa, Ontario
K1A 0H8
Telephone: (613) 941-2351
FAX: (613) 954-1920
Email: christopher.rupar@justice.gc.ca

Summary

Keywords

Taxation — Income Tax — GST — Assessment — Net worth assessments issued by Minister of National Revenue as records provided by taxpayer were grossly inadequate — Assessment methodology involves making estimate of increases to taxpayer’s net worth — Court of Appeal dismissing appeal of decision confirming assessment — Whether Federal Court of Appeal erred in admitting computer-generated casino records — Income Tax Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. 1 (5th Supp.) — Excise Tax Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. E-15.

Summary

Case summaries are prepared by the Office of the Registrar of the Supreme Court of Canada (Law Branch). Please note that summaries are not provided to the Judges of the Court. They are placed on the Court file and website for information purposes only.

The applicant, Thanh Truc Truong appealed net worth assessments issued against her by the Minister of National Revenue, under the Income Tax Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. 1 (5th Supp.) and the Excise Tax Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. E-15.

Net worth assessments were issued by the Minister in this case because the records provided by Ms. Truong were grossly inadequate. The assessment methodology involves making an estimate of increases to a taxpayer’s net worth. The assessments under the Income Tax Act added to income an aggregate amount of $1,682,509 for the 2005 to 2009 taxation years, inclusively. They also imposed gross negligence penalties with respect to these amounts. The assessments under the Excise Tax Act assumed that Ms. Truing had unreported GST collectible for the same periods in an aggregate amount of $92,185. Gross negligence penalties were also imposed on these amounts.

Ms. Truong appealed the assessments to the Tax Court, which upheld them except for a small reduction in unreported income. The Federal Court of Appeal found the Tax Court had made no reviewable error and the appeal should be dismissed.

Lower court rulings

February 8, 2017
Tax Court of Canada

2013-2653(IT)G, 2013-2654(GST)G, 2017 TCC 22

Appeals of the reassessments for the 2005, 2006, 2007 and 2008 taxation years, under the Income Tax Act and the Excise Tax Act, dismissed. The appeals in respect of 2009 allowed to extent that undeclared income is $4,800 less than assessed by the Minister.

January 11, 2018
Federal Court of Appeal

A-92-17, 2018 FCA 6

Appeal dismissed.

Filed documents

The memorandums of argument on an application for leave to appeal will be posted here 30 days after leave to appeal has been granted unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of the memorandum by filling out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613-996-8666 or at 1-844-365-9662.

If you have questions about a memorandum of argument or want to use a memorandum of argument, please contact the author of the memorandum of argument directly. Their name appears at the end of the memorandum of argument. The contact information for counsel is found in the “Counsel” tab of this page.

Downloadable PDFs

Not available

The factums of the appellant, the respondent and the intervener will be posted here at least 2 weeks before the hearing unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of factums by filling out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613-996-8666 or at 1-844-365-9662.

If you have questions about a factum or want permission to use a factum, please contact the author of the factum directly. Their contact information appears on the first page of each factum.

Downloadable PDFs

Not available

The condensed books of the appellant, the respondent and the intervener will be posted here upon receipt of the electronic version, 2 days prior to the scheduled appeal hearing. You may also obtain copies of condensed books by filling out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613-996-8666 or at 1-844-365-9662.

If you have questions about a condensed book or want permission to use a condensed book, please contact the author of the condensed book directly. Their contact information appears on the first page of each condensed book.

Downloadable PDFs

Not available

Webcasts

Not available.

Date modified: 2025-02-27