Skip to main content

Case information

Consult our database for details on a Supreme Court of Canada case.


40695

Michel Foix, et al. v. His Majesty the King

(Federal) (Civil) (By Leave)

Docket

Judgments on applications for leave to appeal are rendered by the Court, but are not necessarily unanimous.

List of proceedings
Date Proceeding Filed By
(if applicable)
2024-03-01 Close file on Leave
2024-02-29 Copy of formal judgment sent to Registrar of the Court of Appeal and all parties
2024-02-29 Judgment on leave sent to the parties
2024-02-29 Judgment of the Court on the application for leave to appeal, The application for leave to appeal from the judgment of the Federal Court of Appeal, Numbers A-234-21, A-235-21 and A-236-21, 2023 FCA 38, dated February 20, 2023 is dismissed with costs.
Dismissed, with costs
2023-10-10 All materials on application for leave submitted to the Judges, for consideration by the Court
2023-06-09 Correspondence received from, Filing pursuant to Rule 92.1 - Supporting correspondence Michel Foix
2023-06-09 Applicant's reply to respondent's argument, (Letter Form), Completed on: 2023-06-13, (Printed version due on 2023-06-16) Michel Foix
2023-06-01 Certificate (on limitations to public access), 23A His Majesty the King
2023-06-01 Respondent's response on the application for leave to appeal, (Book Form), Completed on: 2023-06-02, (Printed version filed on 2023-06-02) His Majesty the King
2023-05-02 Letter acknowledging receipt of a complete application for leave to appeal
2023-04-21 Certificate (on limitations to public access), 23A Michel Foix
2023-04-21 Application for leave to appeal, (Book Form), (3 volumes), Completed on: 2023-05-09, (Printed version filed on 2023-04-25) Michel Foix

Parties

Please note that in the case of closed files, the “Status” column reflects the status of the parties at the time of the proceedings. For more information about the proceedings and about the dates when the file was open, please consult the docket of the case in question.

Main parties

Main parties - Appellants
Name Role Status
Foix, Michel Applicant Active
Souty, Nicolas Applicant Active
Lebel, Sonia Applicant Active

v.

Main parties - Respondents
Name Role Status
His Majesty the King Respondent Active

Counsel

Party: Foix, Michel

Counsel
Names
Dominic C. Belley
Jonathan Lafrance
Contact information
Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP
1, Place Ville Marie
Bureau 2500
Montréal, Quebec
H3B 1R1
Telephone: (514) 847-4747
FAX: (514) 286-5474
Email: dominic.belley@nortonrosefulbright.com

Party: Souty, Nicolas

Counsel
Names
Dominic C. Belley
Jonathan Lafrance
Contact information
Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP
1, Place Ville Marie
Bureau 2500
Montréal, Quebec
H3B 1R1
Telephone: (514) 847-4747
FAX: (514) 286-5474
Email: dominic.belley@nortonrosefulbright.com

Party: Lebel, Sonia

Counsel
Names
Dominic C. Belley
Jonathan Lafrance
Contact information
Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP
1, Place Ville Marie
Bureau 2500
Montréal, Quebec
H3B 1R1
Telephone: (514) 847-4747
FAX: (514) 286-5474
Email: dominic.belley@nortonrosefulbright.com

Party: His Majesty the King

Counsel
Name
Yanick Houle
Contact information
Ministère de la Justice - Canada
Complexe Guy-Favreau, Tour Est
200, boul. René-Lévesque Ouest, 9e étage
Montréal, Quebec
H2Z 1X4
Telephone: (514) 618-0974
FAX: (514) 283-8427
Email: yanick.houle@justice.gc.ca
Agent
Name
Christopher Rupar
Contact information
Attorney General of Canada
Department of Justice Canada
50 O'Connor Street, Suite 500, room 557
Ottawa, Ontario
K2P 6L2
Telephone: (613) 941-2351
FAX: (613) 954-1920
Email: christopher.rupar@justice.gc.ca

Summary

Keywords

Taxation — Income tax — Assessment — Hybrid sale of corporation — Distribution or appropriation of funds or property of corporation to shareholders on winding-up, discontinuance or reorganization of business — Excess cash — Deemed dividend — Meaning of words “distribution” and “reorganization” in context of hybrid sale of shares and assets of corporation pursuant to s. 84(2) of Income Tax Act — Income Tax Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. 1 (5th Supp.), s. 84(2).

Summary

Case summaries are prepared by the Office of the Registrar of the Supreme Court of Canada (Law Branch). Please note that summaries are not provided to the Judges of the Court. They are placed on the Court file and website for information purposes only.

Watch4Net Solutions inc. (W4N) was incorporated by the applicants Michel Foix and Nicolas Souty in 2000. Unlike her spouse Mr. Souty, who held his shares of W4N directly, the applicant Sonia Lebel held her shares of W4N indirectly, as a beneficiary of the family trust, Fiducie Familiale Nicolas Souty 2007. Mr. Foix held his shares of W4N through Virtuose Informatique inc. (Virtuose). In 2006, EMC — a large American public corporation (EMC (US)) and its Canadian subsidiary (EMC Canada) — told the applicants that it wanted to purchase W4N. Mr. Foix and Mr. Souty rejected the purchase offer because they were of the view that the price was too low. In 2011, EMC (US) made a new offer to purchase W4N. In January 2012, the parties agreed on the sale of all W4N shares for $50,000,000. The sale of the shares took place through a letter of interest dated January 20, 2012, which documented the agreement and was accepted by Mr. Foix, on behalf of W4N, on January 23, 2012. In April 2012, the parties agreed instead to a hybrid sale of W4N’s shares and assets for an amount over $70,000,000. The hybrid sale agreement stipulated that W4N was to sell EMC (US) its significant assets, namely, its intellectual property pertaining to the APG software, its ongoing contracts (unless the customers were located in Canada), the shares of its subsidiaries, and all of the goodwill associated with its business. Because the other assets would remain the property of W4N, EMC Canada would then purchase all of W4N’s capital stock directly from the shareholders. The reorganization of the capital stock of W4N and Virtuose unfolded through transactions that were completed between April 24 and May 30, 2012 in accordance with the sale agreement. The hybrid sale occurred between 11:30 p.m. on May 30 and 12:30 a.m. on May 31, 2012 in four steps, which were set out in the sale agreement. On June 1, 2012, W4N, Virtuose and EMC Canada amalgamated. With the exception of Virtuose, which ceased to act as a holding company, W4N and EMC Canada continued to operate under the name EMC Canada. In their 2012 tax return, the applicants each declared a capital gain resulting from the sale of their shares and claimed the capital gains deduction provided for in the Income Tax Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. 1 (5th Supp.). In 2017, the Minister of National Revenue issued reassessments with respect to the three applicants’ 2012 taxation year, treating the capital gains originally declared as deemed dividends pursuant to s. 84(2) of the Income Tax Act. The Tax Court of Canada dismissed the three appeals from the three reassessments. The Federal Court of Appeal dismissed the three appeals from the decisions of the Tax Court of Canada.

Lower court rulings

August 16, 2021
Tax Court of Canada

2021 CCI 52

Appeals (File Nos. 2017-3809(IT)G; 2017 3810(IT)G; 2017-3811(IT)G) from reassessments made under Income Tax Act for 2012 taxation year dismissed



February 20, 2023
Federal Court of Appeal

2023 FCA 38

Appeals dismissed

Filed documents

The memorandums of argument on an application for leave to appeal will be posted here 30 days after leave to appeal has been granted unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of the memorandum by filling out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613-996-8666 or at 1-844-365-9662.

If you have questions about a memorandum of argument or want to use a memorandum of argument, please contact the author of the memorandum of argument directly. Their name appears at the end of the memorandum of argument. The contact information for counsel is found in the “Counsel” tab of this page.

Downloadable PDFs

Not available

The factums of the appellant, the respondent and the intervener will be posted here at least 2 weeks before the hearing unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of factums by filling out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613-996-8666 or at 1-844-365-9662.

If you have questions about a factum or want permission to use a factum, please contact the author of the factum directly. Their contact information appears on the first page of each factum.

Downloadable PDFs

Not available

The condensed books of the appellant, the respondent and the intervener will be posted here upon receipt of the electronic version, 2 days prior to the scheduled appeal hearing. You may also obtain copies of condensed books by filling out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613-996-8666 or at 1-844-365-9662.

If you have questions about a condensed book or want permission to use a condensed book, please contact the author of the condensed book directly. Their contact information appears on the first page of each condensed book.

Downloadable PDFs

Not available

Webcasts

Not available.

Date modified: 2025-02-27