Case information
Conduct a refined search of the Supreme Court of Canada database to obtain details on the status of a matter before the Court.
21197
David Lachance v. Her Majesty the Queen
(Ontario) (Criminal) (By Leave)
Docket
Judgments on applications for leave to appeal are rendered by the Court, but are not necessarily unanimous.
Date | Proceeding | Filed By (if applicable) |
---|---|---|
1990-12-04 | Formal judgment sent to the registrar of the court of appeal and all parties, (Toronto,ON) | |
1990-12-04 | Copy of formal judgment being prepared, Soloway, Wright, Houston (Ottawa,ON) | |
1990-12-04 | Copy of formal judgment being prepared, Shore, Davis & Perkins-McVey (Ottawa,ON) | |
1990-11-22 | Notice of deposit of judgment sent to all parties, Soloway, Wright, Houston (Ottawa,ON) | |
1990-11-22 | Notice of deposit of judgment sent to all parties, Shore, Davis & Perkins-McVey (Ottawa,ON) | |
1990-11-22 |
Judgment on the appeal rendered, CJ CJ LaF L'HD So G McL, The appeal is allowed an a new trial is directed, L'Heureux-Dubé and McLachlin JJ. dissenting. Allowed, no order as to costs |
|
1990-06-26 | General proceeding, copies of B.C. Court of appeal judgment in R. v. Sismey | David Lachance |
1990-05-17 | General proceeding, to file two judgments from trial courts in B.C. and Ontario namely"Regina v. Brunelle" and"Regina v. Land & Gates" | David Lachance |
1989-10-18 | General proceeding, transcripts received and distributed to the Justices. | |
1989-10-03 |
Hearing of the appeal, 1989-10-03, (Appeal heard Oct 3rd & 4th), CJ CJ LaF L'HD So G McL Decision reserved |
|
1989-09-28 | Respondent's factum, 21 copies, with service | Her Majesty the Queen |
1989-09-28 | Order on motion for additional time to present oral argument | |
1989-09-27 | Book of authorities, 10 copies vols 1 to 10 (joint with Garifoli) | David Lachance |
1989-09-27 |
Appeal hearing scheduled, 1989-10-03 Decision reserved |
|
1989-09-26 |
Decision on motion for additional time to present oral argument, is granted, only in allowing counsel for both appeals of Garofoli (21099) and Lachance to present argument sequentially and then to allow the respondents to present their argument., G Granted, no order as to costs |
|
1989-09-26 | Hearing of motion for additional time to present oral argument, 1989-09-26, is granted, only in allowing counsel for both appeals of Garofoli (21099) and Lachance to present argument sequentially and then to allow the respondents to present their argument., G | |
1989-09-26 | Submission of motion for additional time to present oral argument, 1989-09-26, is granted, only in allowing counsel for both appeals of Garofoli (21099) and Lachance to present argument sequentially and then to allow the respondents to present their argument., G | |
1989-09-22 | Affidavit, With service | David Lachance |
1989-09-22 | Motion for additional time to present oral argument, (joint motion with Garofoli (21099), with service | David Lachance |
1989-09-18 | Appeal perfected for hearing, Session beginning on 1989-10-02 | |
1989-09-13 | Appellant's factum, 21 copies, with service | David Lachance |
1989-09-12 | Case on appeal, (volumes 1 to 4) 21 copies | David Lachance |
1989-09-07 | General proceeding, to note Appeal to be heard October 2, 1989 together with "Dersch -v- A.G. of Canada" (20580), "Garofoli -v- The Queen" (21099), "Le procureur général du Canada -v- Vincent Zito" (21078) | |
1989-07-12 | Order granting leave to appeal | |
1989-07-05 | Notice of appeal | David Lachance |
1989-06-12 | Close file on Leave | |
1989-06-12 | Notice of deposit of judgment issued to all parties, Shore, Davis & Malek (Ott., Ont.) | |
1989-06-12 | Notice of deposit of judgment issued to all parties, Soloway, Wright, Houston & Associates (Ott., Ont.) | |
1989-06-08 |
Judgment of the Court on the application for leave to appeal, (for hearing date & filing dates see Garofoli -v- The Queen (21099)., McI LaF So, The application for leave to appeal is granted. Granted, no order as to costs |
|
1988-12-05 |
Hearing of the application for leave to appeal, 1988-12-05, with extension of time, McI LaF So Decision reserved |
|
1988-12-05 |
All materials on application for leave submitted to the Judges, 1988-12-05, with extension of time, McI LaF So Decision reserved |
|
1988-11-23 | Service, of Respondent's argument | |
1988-11-23 | Respondent's response on the application for leave to appeal, , 5 copies | Her Majesty the Queen |
1988-10-28 | $30.00 filing fee, receipt # 13044 | David Lachance |
1988-10-28 | Motion to extend the time to file and or serve the application for leave to appeal, With service | David Lachance |
1988-10-28 | Application for leave to appeal, 5 copies, with service, Completed on: 1988-10-28 | David Lachance |
Parties
Please note that in the case of closed files, the “Status” column reflects the status of the parties at the time of the proceedings. For more information about the proceedings and about the dates when the file was open, please consult the docket of the case in question.
Main parties
Name | Role | Status |
---|---|---|
Lachance, David | Applicant | Active |
v.
Name | Role | Status |
---|---|---|
Her Majesty the Queen | Respondent | Active |
Counsel
Party: Lachance, David
Counsel
Michael Code
1130 - 20 Dundas St West
Box 180
Toronto, Ontario
M5G 2G8
Telephone: (416) 979-6446
FAX: (416) 591-7333
Agent
800 - 200 Elgin St
Ottawa, Ontario
K2P 1L5
Telephone: (613) 233-7747
FAX: (613) 233-2374
Party: Her Majesty the Queen
Counsel
Jeff Casey
Scott Hutchison
720 BAY ST
10TH FL
TORONTO, Ontario
M5G 2K1
Telephone: (416) 326-4600
FAX: (416) 326-4656
Agent
70 Gloucester St
Ottawa, Ontario
K2P 0A2
Telephone: (613) 566-2058
FAX: (613) 235-4430
Summary
Keywords
None.
Summary
Case summaries are prepared by the Office of the Registrar of the Supreme Court of Canada (Law Branch). Please note that summaries are not provided to the Judges of the Court. They are placed on the Court file and website for information purposes only.
None.
Lower court rulings
District Court of Ontario
1264/85
Verdict: Guilty to the lesser & included offence of aggravated Assault
Court of Appeal for Ontario
See file
Appeal dismissed
Memorandums of argument on application for leave to appeal
The memorandums of argument on an application for leave to appeal will be posted here 30 days after leave to appeal has been granted unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of the memorandum by filing out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.
If you have questions about a memorandum of argument or want to use a memorandum of argument, please contact the author of the memorandum of argument directly. Their name appears at the end of the memorandum of argument. The contact information for counsel is found in the “Counsel” tab of this page.
Downloadable PDFs
Not available
Related links
Factums on appeal
The factums of the appellant, the respondent and the intervener will be posted here at least 2 weeks before the hearing unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of factums by filling out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.
If you have questions about a factum or want permission to use a factum, please contact the author of the factum directly. Their contact information appears on the first page of each factum.
Downloadable PDFs
Not available