Case information
Conduct a refined search of the Supreme Court of Canada database to obtain details on the status of a matter before the Court.
22555
Walter A. Tucker, et al. v. Her Majesty the Queen
(Ontario) (Criminal) (By Leave)
Docket
Judgments on applications for leave to appeal are rendered by the Court, but are not necessarily unanimous.
| Date | Proceeding | Filed By (if applicable) |
|---|---|---|
| 1992-08-28 | Close file on Leave | |
| 1992-08-28 | General proceeding | |
| 1992-06-09 | Copy of formal judgment sent to Registrar of the Court of Appeal and all parties, Ontario (Toronto) | |
| 1992-06-09 | Copy of formal judgment on leave being prepared, D.D. Graham Reynolds (Toronto,ON) | |
| 1992-06-09 | Copy of formal judgment on leave being prepared, Sister Jo-Anne Tucker (Hamilton,ON) | |
| 1992-06-09 | Copy of formal judgment on leave being prepared, Rev. Brother W.A. Tucker (Hamilton,ON) | |
| 1992-05-28 | Notice of deposit of judgment issued to all parties, Sister Jo-Anne Tucker (Hamilton,ON) | |
| 1992-05-28 | Notice of deposit of judgment issued to all parties, D.D. Grahm Reynolds c/o A.G. of Canada (Tor,ON) | |
| 1992-05-28 | Notice of deposit of judgment issued to all parties, Reverend Brother Walter A. Tucker (Hamilton,ON) | |
| 1992-05-28 |
Judgment of the Court on the application for leave to appeal, LaF So G, The application for leave to appeal is dismissed. Dismissed, no order as to costs |
|
| 1992-05-28 | Hearing of the application for leave to appeal, 1992-05-28, LaF So G | |
| 1992-05-28 | All materials on application for leave submitted to the Judges, 1992-05-28, LaF So G | |
| 1992-05-27 | Correspondence received from, from N. Loreti sent to Rev. Brother Baldasaro acknowledging receipt of letter dated May 5, 1992. Rules of Court provide that once Resp. memo has been filed, application shall be referred to Court for determination. Application was therefore referred on A | |
| 1992-05-12 | Correspondence received from, dated May 5, 1992 from Rev. Brother Baldasaro (Re: Do not act for Sister Jo-Anne Tucker. Hearing of leave would be suspended pending approval of Sister Tucker's application before legal aid. Intention to make in person representation) | |
| 1992-04-27 | Correspondence received from, of Nadia Loreti to Mr. Baldasaro advising that the Registrar has excused the parties from paying the $30.00 filing fee and the leave to appeal has been referred to the Court for determination | |
| 1992-04-22 | Application for leave to appeal, (as $30 filing fee not required), Completed on: 1992-04-22 | |
| 1992-04-21 | All materials on application for leave submitted to the Judges, LaF So G | |
| 1992-02-24 | Correspondence received from, dated Feb 14, 1992 from D.D. Graham Reynolds requesting present status of these proceedings, or whether there are any steps the Respondent might currently take to have matters determined. | |
| 1991-11-22 | Correspondence received from, from N. Loreti sent to Rev. Brother Michael A.J. Baldasaro (Hamilton,ON) acknowledging receipt of his letter dated Nov 5, 1991. Refer him to our letter dated Nov 4, 1991. | |
| 1991-11-15 | Correspondence received from, dated Nov 5, 1991 from Rev. Brother Walter A. Tucker (Re: Motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis suspended pending Sister Jo-Anne Tucker's application for Legal Aid at Hamilton) | |
| 1991-11-08 | Correspondence received from, dated Oct.10/91 fr. David Doney indicating that he is assisting Sister Jo-Anne Tucker with her application | |
| 1991-11-04 | Correspondence received from, of N. Loreti sent to Rev. Brother Baldasaro acknowledging receipt of letter dated Oct 7, 1991. Applications for leave will not be referred to the Court until the matter of the $30 filing fee is resolved. Copy sent to Mr. D.D. Graham Reynolds. | |
| 1991-10-28 | Correspondence received from, dated October 21, 1991 from D.D. Graham Reynolds attaching a copy of correspondence from Rev. Brother Baldasaro. It was his understanding that both applications had properly been perfected & on this basis, the Resp. filed its memo of argument. | |
| 1991-10-07 | Correspondence received from, re: service | Jo-Anne Tucker |
| 1991-09-27 | Correspondence received from, from N. Loreti sent to Rev. Brother Michael A.J. Baldasaro (Hamilton,ON) acknowledging receipt of his letter dated Aug 23, 1991. Advising that the Registrar may, in special circumstances, excuse a party from paying $30.00 fee. To obtain this order, must | |
| 1991-09-16 | Correspondence received from, dated Aug 21, 1991 from D.D. Graham Reynolds enclosing 5 copies of Memo of argument w/service. (Re: Mr. Doney does not act for Sister Jo-Anne Tucker. Also, Mr. Baldasaro is not a Barrister & Solicitor and accordingly, have not served Mr. Baldasaro as cou | |
| 1991-09-13 | Correspondence received from, of D.D. Graham Reynolds informing the Court that Mr. David G. Doney is not acting for Jo-Anne Tucker in these proceedings. He is also advising the Court that one Michael A.J. Baldasaro is not a Barrister and Solicitor. Accordingly the Crown has not served | Her Majesty the Queen |
| 1991-09-13 | Respondent's response on the application for leave to appeal, 5 copies, with service | Her Majesty the Queen |
| 1991-09-06 | Correspondence received from, dated Aug 23, 1991 from Rev. Baldasaro (Re: Cannot afford to pay any fees. Request instuctions in this matter). | |
| 1991-08-08 | Correspondence received from, of Nadia Loreti to applicants acknowledging receipt of application for leave and requesting $30.00 for filing fee | |
| 1991-08-08 | Correspondence received from, from B. Kincaid sent to Mr. D.D. Graham Reynolds c/o Dept. of Justice (Toronto,ON) advising him that the file number in the case Rev. Brother Walter A. Tucketer, et al v. Queen (Crt. of Appeal file No. 942/89) is 22554 and that the file number in the case | |
| 1991-07-29 | Court of Appeal casebooks and transcripts of evidence, 1 copy of appeal book & 2 copies of suppl. appeal book | |
| 1991-07-25 | Application for leave to appeal, 10 copies (30.00$ missing) (C/A no# 941/89), with service, Incomplete | Walter A. Tucker |
Parties
Please note that in the case of closed files, the “Status” column reflects the status of the parties at the time of the proceedings. For more information about the proceedings and about the dates when the file was open, please consult the docket of the case in question.
Main parties
| Name | Role | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Tucker, Walter A. | Applicant | Active |
| Tucker, Jo-Anne | Applicant | Active |
v.
| Name | Role | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Her Majesty the Queen | Respondent | Active |
Counsel
Party: Tucker, Walter A.
This party is not represented by counsel.
Party: Tucker, Jo-Anne
This party is not represented by counsel.
Party: Her Majesty the Queen
Counsel
130 King Street West
Suite 3400
Toronto, Ontario
M5X 1K6
Telephone: (416) 952-5042
FAX: (416) 973-8253
Email: greynolds@justice.gc.ca
Summary
Keywords
None.
Summary
Case summaries are prepared by the Office of the Registrar of the Supreme Court of Canada (Law Branch). Please note that summaries are not provided to the Judges of the Court. They are placed on the Court file and website for information purposes only.
None.
Lower court rulings
Supreme Court of Ontario
RE1211/89
Application for an order quashing the App. committal for trial dismissed
Court of Appeal for Ontario
941/89
Appeal dismissed
Memorandums of argument on application for leave to appeal
The memorandums of argument on an application for leave to appeal will be posted here 30 days after leave to appeal has been granted unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of the memorandum by filing out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.
If you have questions about a memorandum of argument or want to use a memorandum of argument, please contact the author of the memorandum of argument directly. Their name appears at the end of the memorandum of argument. The contact information for counsel is found in the “Counsel” tab of this page.
Downloadable PDFs
Not available
Related links
Factums on appeal
The factums of the appellant, the respondent and the intervener will be posted here at least 2 weeks before the hearing unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of factums by filling out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.
If you have questions about a factum or want permission to use a factum, please contact the author of the factum directly. Their contact information appears on the first page of each factum.
Downloadable PDFs
Not available