Supreme Court of Canada

Docket

Judgments on applications for leave to appeal are rendered by the Court, but are not necessarily unanimous.

List of proceedings
Date	Proceeding	Filed By (if applicable)
1993-07-12	Close file on Leave
1993-07-12	Close file on Leave
1992-07-02	Copy of formal judgment sent to Registrar of the Court of Appeal and all parties, Quebec (Quebec)
1992-07-02	Copy of formal judgment on leave being prepared, Flynn, Rivard (Quebec,QC)
1992-07-02	Copy of formal judgment on leave being prepared, Bhadresh Manek (Duberger,Quebec City QC)
1992-07-02	Copy of formal judgment on leave being prepared, Kamlesh Manek (Duberger,Quebec City QC)
1992-07-02	Copy of formal judgment on leave being prepared, Ramnikal Manek (Duberger,QC)
1992-06-25	Judgment of the Court on the application for leave to appeal, L'HD G Co, The application for leave to appeal is dismissed with costs Dismissed, with costs
1992-06-25	Hearing of the application for leave to appeal, 1992-06-25, L'HD G Co
1992-06-25	All materials on application for leave submitted to the Judges, 1992-06-25, L'HD G Co
1992-06-25	Notice of deposit of judgment issued to all parties, Ramniklal Manek (Duberger,QC)
1992-06-25	Notice of deposit of judgment issued to all parties, Kamlesh Manek (Duberger,QC)
1992-06-25	Notice of deposit of judgment issued to all parties, Bhadresh Manek (Duberger,QC)
1992-06-25	Notice of deposit of judgment issued to all parties, Flynn, rivard (Québec,QC)
1992-05-12	All materials on application for leave submitted to the Judges, L'HD G Co
1992-02-12	Applicant's reply to respondent's argument, (by fax) 1 copy	Ramniklal Manek
1992-02-06	Respondent's response on the application for leave to appeal, 5 copies	Raymond Malenfant
1992-01-31	Correspondence received from, sent to Mr. Kamlesh Manek (Quebec,QC) from Nadia Loreti; re: acknowledge receipt of undated letter addressed to the Registrar of the Supreme Court along with other materials. Court file # is 22283 please advise other parties.
1992-01-20	Application for leave to appeal, as motion for extension of time to serve & affidavit filed, Completed on: 1992-01-20
1992-01-20	Proof of service, of application for leave to appeal (along with motion & affidavit)
1992-01-20	Affidavit, to serve the application for leave to appeal (5 copies), avec signification	Ramniklal Manek
1992-01-20	Motion to extend time, ***entered in error***, avec signification	Ramniklal Manek
1992-01-20	Motion to extend time, to serve the application for leave (5 copies), avec signification	Ramniklal Manek
1992-01-10	Correspondence received from, of Nadia Loreti requesting an extension of time (with a sample)
1992-01-06	$30.00 filing fee, #23746	Ramniklal Manek
1992-01-06	Application for leave to appeal, 5 copies (extension of time to serve & proof of service requested), Incomplete	Ramniklal Manek
1991-12-06	Correspondence received from, of Nadia Loreti with all the necessary information s to file an application for leave to appeal

Parties

Please note that in the case of closed files, the “Status” column reflects the status of the parties at the time of the proceedings. For more information about the proceedings and about the dates when the file was open, please consult the docket of the case in question.

Main parties

Main parties - Appellants
Name	Role	Status
Manek, Ramniklal	Applicant	Active
Manek, Kamlesh	Applicant	Active
Manek, Bhadresh	Applicant	Active

v.

Main parties - Respondents
Name	Role	Status
Malenfant, Raymond	Respondent	Active
Perron, Colette	Respondent	Active
Malenfant, Alain	Respondent	Active
Malenfant, Estelle	Respondent	Active
Malenfant, France	Respondent	Active

Counsel

Party: Manek, Ramniklal

This party is not represented by counsel.

Party: Manek, Kamlesh

This party is not represented by counsel.

Party: Manek, Bhadresh

This party is not represented by counsel.

Party: Malenfant, Raymond