Skip to main content

Case information

Conduct a refined search of the Supreme Court of Canada database to obtain details on the status of a matter before the Court.


24327

Harald Horst Ludwig v. Carolyn Crick

(British Columbia) (Civil) (By Leave)

Docket

Judgments on applications for leave to appeal are rendered by the Court, but are not necessarily unanimous.

List of proceedings
Date Proceeding Filed By
(if applicable)
1995-10-05 Certificate of taxation issued to, Essential Services Group
1995-10-05 $50.00 filing fee for a bill of costs for taxation, receipt #30817 Carolyn Crick
1995-10-02 Decision on the bill of costs, by the Registrar at $505.25
1995-08-21 Close file on Leave
1995-07-24 Notice of change of solicitor, to appoint Sarah B. Pollard as sollicitor in place of Rosemary L. Nash (N.B. this notice is file for the purpose of filing the bill of cost as Mrs. Nash has retired from practice) Carolyn Crick
1995-04-18 Copy of formal judgment sent to Registrar of the Court of Appeal and all parties, British Columbia (Vancouver)
1995-04-18 Copy of formal judgment on leave being prepared, Rosemary L. Nash (Vancouver, BC)
1995-04-18 Copy of formal judgment on leave being prepared, Gowling, Strathy & Henderson (Ottawa, ON)
1995-03-02 Judgment of the Court on the application for leave to appeal, L'HD So McL, The application for leave to appeal is dismissed with costs.
Dismissed, with costs
1995-03-02 Notice of deposit of judgment issued to all parties, Rosemary L. Nash (Vancouver, BC)
1995-03-02 Notice of deposit of judgment issued to all parties, Gowling, Strathy & Henderson (Ottawa, ON)
1994-12-14 Proof of service, of the applicant's reply
1994-11-14 Applicant's reply to respondent's argument, 5 copies sent to L'HD So McL, Nov 16/94 Harald Horst Ludwig
1994-11-10 All materials on application for leave submitted to the Judges, L'HD So McL
1994-11-08 Correspondence received from, of Rosemary L. Nash to advise the Court that she will not be available for the hearing of this application until January 1995 Harald Horst Ludwig
1994-11-01 Respondent's response on the application for leave to appeal, 5 copies Carolyn Crick
1994-11-01 Proof of service, of the application for leave to appeal (service admitted on Oct. 13/94)
1994-10-26 Correspondence received from, sent to Gowling, Strathy & Henderson (Ottawa, ON) to acknowledge receipt of material commencing a proceeding
1994-10-26 Correspondence received from, sent to Rosemary L. Nash (Vancouver, BC) enclosing copy of letter dated Oct 26/94 sent to applicant
1994-10-18 General proceeding, 5 copies of formal order of Court of Appeal (TO BE SENT WITH THE APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL) Harald Horst Ludwig
1994-10-18 Application for leave to appeal, 5 copies, with service, Completed on: 1994-10-18 Harald Horst Ludwig
1994-10-11 $30.00 filing fee, rec. #21055 Harald Horst Ludwig

Parties

Please note that in the case of closed files, the “Status” column reflects the status of the parties at the time of the proceedings. For more information about the proceedings and about the dates when the file was open, please consult the docket of the case in question.

Main parties

Main parties - Appellants
Name Role Status
Ludwig, Harald Horst Applicant Active

v.

Main parties - Respondents
Name Role Status
Crick, Carolyn Respondent Active

Counsel

Party: Ludwig, Harald Horst

Counsel
George K. MacIntosh, Q.C.
Farris, Vaughan, Wills & Murphy
2600 - 700 GEORGIA ST W
BOX 10026
VANCOUVER, British Columbia
V7Y 1B3
Telephone: (604) 684-9151
FAX: (604) 661-9349
Agent
Brian A. Crane, Q.C.
Gowling, Strathy & Henderson
2600 - 160 Elgin St
Box 466 Stn A
Ottawa, Ontario
K1N 8S3
Telephone: (613) 232-1781
FAX: (613) 563-9869

Party: Crick, Carolyn

Counsel
Sarah B. Pollard
Davidson Muir
303 - 2695 GRANVILLE ST
VANCOUVER, British Columbia
V6H 3H4
Telephone: (604) 736-3638

Summary

Keywords

None.

Summary

Case summaries are prepared by the Office of the Registrar of the Supreme Court of Canada (Law Branch). Please note that summaries are not provided to the Judges of the Court. They are placed on the Court file and website for information purposes only.

None.

Lower court rulings

October 16, 1992
Supreme Court of British Columbia

C895644

respondent's claim dismissed

August 16, 1994
Court of Appeal for British Columbia (Vancouver)

CA016303

appeal allowed

Memorandums of argument on application for leave to appeal

The memorandums of argument on an application for leave to appeal will be posted here 30 days after leave to appeal has been granted unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of the memorandum by filing out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.

If you have questions about a memorandum of argument or want to use a memorandum of argument, please contact the author of the memorandum of argument directly. Their name appears at the end of the memorandum of argument. The contact information for counsel is found in the “Counsel” tab of this page.

Downloadable PDFs

Not available

Factums on appeal

The factums of the appellant, the respondent and the intervener will be posted here at least 2 weeks before the hearing unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of factums by filling out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.

If you have questions about a factum or want permission to use a factum, please contact the author of the factum directly. Their contact information appears on the first page of each factum.

Downloadable PDFs

Not available

Webcasts

Not available.

Date modified: 2025-02-27