Case information
Conduct a refined search of the Supreme Court of Canada database to obtain details on the status of a matter before the Court.
24534
H.A. v. M.T.
(Quebec) (Civil) (By Leave)
(Publication ban on party)
Docket
Judgments on applications for leave to appeal are rendered by the Court, but are not necessarily unanimous.
| Date | Proceeding | Filed By (if applicable) |
|---|---|---|
| 1995-08-16 | Close file on Leave | |
| 1995-07-12 | Copy of formal judgment sent to Registrar of the Court of Appeal and all parties, Quebec (Montreal) | |
| 1995-07-12 | Copy of formal judgment on leave being prepared, Muriel De Toledo (Montréal, QC) | |
| 1995-07-12 | Copy of formal judgment on leave being prepared, Gowling, Strathy & Henderson (Ottawa, ON) | |
| 1995-06-29 |
Judgment of the Court on the application for leave to appeal, CJ L'HD G, The application for leave to appeal is dismissed with costs. Dismissed, with costs |
|
| 1995-06-29 | Notice of deposit of judgment issued to all parties, Gowling, Strathy & Henderson (Ottawa, ON) | |
| 1995-06-29 | Notice of deposit of judgment issued to all parties, Muriel De Toledo (Montréal, QC) | |
| 1995-06-27 |
Decision on motion to extend time, to file the response to May 11/95, Reg Granted, no order as to costs |
|
| 1995-06-27 | Hearing of motion to extend time, 1995-06-27, to file the response to May 11/95, Reg | |
| 1995-06-27 | Submission of motion to extend time, 1995-06-27, to file the response to May 11/95, Reg | |
| 1995-06-26 | Correspondence received from, of Julius H. Grey (Grey Casgrain) to advise the Court that a reply is unnecessary (by fax), sent to CJ L'HD G, June 27/95 | H.A. |
| 1995-06-16 | Correspondence received from, (by fax) of Julius Grey (Grey Casgrain) to confirm that he has no objection to extend time so long as his delay to answer runs from this day | H.A. |
| 1995-05-16 | Motion to extend time, to file the respondent's response | M.T. |
| 1995-05-11 | Respondent's response on the application for leave to appeal, (by fax) 1 copy only (TAKE NOTE that on May 12 and on May 17 we have requested by fax to serve the applicant with her response and her motion to extend time. Finaly on June 5/95, after confirmation by Mr. Grey that he did not received any documents from t | M.T. |
| 1995-05-09 | All materials on application for leave submitted to the Judges, CJ L'HD G | |
| 1995-03-21 | Correspondence received from, sent to Simon Richter (Montréal, QC) enclosing copy of letter dated March 21/95 sent to applicant | |
| 1995-03-21 | Correspondence received from, sent to Gowling, Strathy & Henderson (Ottawa, ON) to acknowledge receipt of material commencing a proceeding | |
| 1995-03-16 | Proof of service, of the application for leave to appeal (service admitted on March 15, 1995) | |
| 1995-03-15 | Application for leave to appeal, 5 copies (proof of service missing) (TO BE EXPEDITED - SEE SOPINKA'S ORDER DATED FEB. 6/95), Completed on: 1995-03-16 | H.A. |
| 1995-02-06 |
Hearing of motion for a stay of execution, 1995-02-06 Decision reserved |
|
| 1995-02-06 |
Submission of motion for a stay of execution, 1995-02-06 Decision reserved |
|
| 1995-02-06 |
Decision on the motion for a stay of execution, So, the applicant is released until a decision is made on the application for leave to appeal and, if granted, until the appeal is disposed of. In the event that the application for leave to appeal or the appeal is dismissed, the applicant shall surrender to the warden of the prison in which he is presently confined. I am also persuaded by the respondent that as a further condition of this order, the applicant is not to exercise his right of access to the children of the marriage under the judgment of Bishop J. during the period of interim release. The application for leave is to be expedited. Costs of the application in the appeal. (for reasons see file). Granted, no order as to costs |
|
| 1995-02-06 | Hearing of motion for a stay of execution, 1995-02-06, So | |
| 1995-02-06 | Submission of motion for a stay of execution, 1995-02-06, So | |
| 1995-02-02 | General proceeding, to note a copy of appellant's factum filed in the Court of Appeal | H.A. |
| 1995-02-01 | Correspondence received from, from Ms. Toledo; re: relieving Mr. Simon Richter from this file | M.T. |
| 1995-02-01 | Other documents on motion for a stay of execution, Affidavit of Hagop Artinian; 2 copies, with service | |
| 1995-02-01 | Motion for a stay of execution, 2 copies, with service | H.A. |
| 1995-01-19 | $30.00 filing fee, receipt #22030 | H.A. |
| 1995-01-19 | Notice of application for leave to appeal | H.A. |
Parties
Please note that in the case of closed files, the “Status” column reflects the status of the parties at the time of the proceedings. For more information about the proceedings and about the dates when the file was open, please consult the docket of the case in question.
Main parties
| Name | Role | Status |
|---|---|---|
| H.A. | Applicant | Active |
v.
| Name | Role | Status |
|---|---|---|
| M.T. | Respondent | Active |
Counsel
Party: H.A.
Counsel
2102 - 3410 rue Peel
Montréal, Quebec
H3A 1W8
Telephone: (514) 288-6180
FAX: (514) 288-8908
Agent
2600 - 160 Elgin St
PO Box 466, Stn A
Ottawa, Ontario
K1N 8S3
Telephone: (613) 232-1781
FAX: (613) 563-9869
Party: M.T.
Counsel
MONTRÉAL, Quebec
H3W 1W7
Telephone: (514) 739-2610
FAX: (514) 668-0117
Summary
Keywords
None.
Summary
Case summaries are prepared by the Office of the Registrar of the Supreme Court of Canada (Law Branch). Please note that summaries are not provided to the Judges of the Court. They are placed on the Court file and website for information purposes only.
None.
Lower court rulings
Superior Court of Quebec
x
applicant held in contempt of Court and condemned to four months in prison
Court of Appeal of Quebec (Montréal)
500-09-000817-924
appeal dismissed
Memorandums of argument on application for leave to appeal
The memorandums of argument on an application for leave to appeal will be posted here 30 days after leave to appeal has been granted unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of the memorandum by filing out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.
If you have questions about a memorandum of argument or want to use a memorandum of argument, please contact the author of the memorandum of argument directly. Their name appears at the end of the memorandum of argument. The contact information for counsel is found in the “Counsel” tab of this page.
Downloadable PDFs
Not available
Related links
Factums on appeal
The factums of the appellant, the respondent and the intervener will be posted here at least 2 weeks before the hearing unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of factums by filling out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.
If you have questions about a factum or want permission to use a factum, please contact the author of the factum directly. Their contact information appears on the first page of each factum.
Downloadable PDFs
Not available