Skip to main content

Case information

Conduct a refined search of the Supreme Court of Canada database to obtain details on the status of a matter before the Court.


27209

Maytag Corporation, et al. v. Whirlpool Corporation, et al.

(Federal) (Civil) (By Leave)

Docket

Judgments on applications for leave to appeal are rendered by the Court, but are not necessarily unanimous.

List of proceedings
Date Proceeding Filed By
(if applicable)
2001-04-06 Appeal closed
2001-04-05 Formal judgment sent to the registrar of the court of appeal and all parties, (on motion for rehearing)
2001-04-05 Record returned to the Registrar of the Court of Appeal
2001-03-23 Copy of formal judgment being prepared, (on motion for rehearing)
2001-02-23 Notice of deposit of judgment on motion for a re-hearing of the appeal
2001-02-22 Decision on the motion for a re-hearing of the appeal, CJ L'HD G Ia Ma Ba Bi
Dismissed, with costs
2001-02-12 All material on motion for a re-hearing of the appeal submitted to Justices, CJ L'HD G Ia Ma Ba Bi
2001-02-09 Reply to the response to the motion for a re-hearing of the appeal, Completed on: 2001-02-09 Maytag Corporation
2001-01-26 Response to the motion for a re-hearing of the appeal, (12 copies), Completed on: 2001-01-26 Whirlpool Corporation
2001-01-15 Motion for a re-hearing of the appeal, (12 copies), Completed on: 2001-01-15 Maytag Corporation
2001-01-08 Formal judgment sent to the registrar of the court of appeal and all parties
2000-12-20 Copy of formal judgment being prepared
2000-12-18 Notice of deposit of judgment sent to all parties
2000-12-15 Judgment on the appeal rendered, L'HD G McL Ia Ma Ba Bi, The appeal is dismissed with costs in these proceedings to the respondent insofar as such costs were incurred over and above those incurred in the Camco appeal (27208).
Dismissed, with costs
1999-12-23 Transcript received, and distributed to the justices (88 pages)(joint with 27208)
1999-12-14 Hearing of the appeal, 1999-12-14, L'HD G McL Ia Ma Ba Bi
Decision reserved
1999-12-13 Supplemental document, (condensed book) (joint with 27208) Maytag Corporation
1999-12-09 Decision on motion for directions, Ba, This appeal together with appeal (27208) will be heard as one appeal. The time for argument by the appellants and respondents is fixed at 1 hour and 15 minutes each, the time for reply shall be 5 minutes.
Granted, no order as to costs
1999-12-09 Submission of motion for directions, Ba
1999-12-07 Notice of appearance Maytag Corporation
1999-12-07 Response to motion for directions, (Letter Form), from the respondents dated Dec. 6/99 (joint with 27208) (5 copies), Completed on: 1999-12-07 Whirlpool Corporation
1999-12-02 Motion for directions, and for allocation of time (5 copies - book form) (joint with 27208), Completed on: 1999-12-02 Maytag Corporation
1999-11-26 Correspondence received from, P. Everitt dated Nov. 25, 1999 (fax copy) re: responding to J. Kokonis's letter dated Nov. 24, 1999 (joint with 27208) Whirlpool Corporation
1999-11-25 Correspondence received from, J. Kokonis dated Nov. 24, 1999 re: time for oral argumentation (joint with 27208) Maytag Corporation
1999-11-19 Respondent's factum, Completed on: 1999-11-19 Whirlpool Corporation
1999-09-27 Appellant's record, Completed on: 1999-09-27 Maytag Corporation
1999-09-27 Appellant's factum, Completed on: 1999-09-27 Maytag Corporation
1999-09-20 Appeal hearing scheduled, 1999-12-14
Decision reserved
1999-09-07 Notice of hearing, (Dec. 14/99) Maytag Corporation
1999-08-10 Appeal perfected for hearing, Session beginning on 1999-10-04
1999-07-15 Appeal court record, 1 box (joint with Trial record)
1999-07-15 Trial court record, 1 box (joint with C/A record)
1999-07-12 Correspondence received from, K.K. Graham dated July 12/99 re: scheduling of the appeal Maytag Corporation
1999-06-17 Letter acknowledging receipt of notice of appeal
1999-06-15 Notice of appeal, Completed on: 1999-06-15 Maytag Corporation
1999-06-11 Order granting leave to appeal
1999-05-18 Notice of deposit of judgment issued to all parties
1999-05-17 Judgment of the Court on the application for leave to appeal, The application for leave to appeal is granted.
Granted, no order as to costs
1999-05-07 All materials on application for leave submitted to the Judges, Ma Ba Bi
1999-05-03 Correspondence (sent by the Court) to, Mr. Kokonis (cc. all parties); re: Camco & Maytag leave app.
1999-05-03 Correspondence received, (by fax) from Louis Massson; re: letter dated Apr. 29 from Mr. Kokonis (joint with 27208-26406)
1999-05-03 Letter acknowledging receipt of a complete application for leave to appeal
1999-04-30 Correspondence received from, (by fax) from P.R. Everitt; re: letter from Mr. Kokonis addressed to CJ; re: Free World appeal (joint with 27208) Whirlpool Corporation
1999-04-29 Correspondence received from, J.J. Kokonis, Q.C. addressed to the Chief Justice; re: if leave granted would like to be heard with Free World Trust (26406) (joint with 27208-26406) Maytag Corporation
1999-04-26 Applicant's reply to respondent's argument, Completed on: 1999-04-26 Maytag Corporation
1999-04-20 Respondent's response on the application for leave to appeal, Completed on: 1999-04-20 Whirlpool Corporation
1999-03-23 Application for leave to appeal, Completed on: 1999-03-23 Maytag Corporation

Parties

Please note that in the case of closed files, the “Status” column reflects the status of the parties at the time of the proceedings. For more information about the proceedings and about the dates when the file was open, please consult the docket of the case in question.

Main parties

Main parties - Appellants
Name Role Status
Maytag Corporation Appellant Active
Maytag Limited Appellant Active
Maytag Quebec Inc. Appellant Active

v.

Main parties - Respondents
Name Role Status
Whirlpool Corporation Respondent Active
Inglis Limited Respondent Active

Counsel

Party: Maytag Corporation

Counsel
Stephen M. Lane
James D. Kokonis
Dennis S. K. Leung
Sim, Hughes, Ashton & McKay
6th Floor
330 University Avenue
Toronto, Ontario
M5G 1R7
Telephone: (416) 595-1155
FAX: (416) 595-1163
Agent
James D. Kokonis, Q.C.
Smart & Biggar
900 - 55 Metcalfe Street
PO Box 2999, Station D
Ottawa, Ontario
K1P 5Y6
Telephone: (613) 232-2486
FAX: (613) 232-8440

Party: Maytag Limited

Counsel
Stephen M. Lane
Sim, Hughes, Ashton & McKay
6th Floor
330 University Avenue
Toronto, Ontario
M5G 1R7
Telephone: (416) 595-1155
FAX: (416) 595-1163
Agent
James D. Kokonis, Q.C.
Smart & Biggar
900 - 55 Metcalfe Street
PO Box 2999, Station D
Ottawa, Ontario
K1P 5Y6
Telephone: (613) 232-2486
FAX: (613) 232-8440

Party: Maytag Quebec Inc.

Counsel
Stephen M. Lane
Sim, Hughes, Ashton & McKay
6th Floor
330 University Avenue
Toronto, Ontario
M5G 1R7
Telephone: (416) 595-1155
FAX: (416) 595-1163
Agent
James D. Kokonis, Q.C.
Smart & Biggar
900 - 55 Metcalfe Street
PO Box 2999, Station D
Ottawa, Ontario
K1P 5Y6
Telephone: (613) 232-2486
FAX: (613) 232-8440

Party: Whirlpool Corporation

Counsel
Christopher Kvas
Peter R. Everitt
Barrigar & Moss
Suite 1502, 77 Bloor Street West
Toronto, Ontario
M5S 1M2
Telephone: (416) 921-6558
FAX: (416) 923-0760
Agent
Mitchell B. Charness
Ridout & Maybee
18th Flr. 150 Metcalfe St.
Ottawa, Ontario
K2P 1P1
Telephone: (613) 236-1995
FAX: (613) 236-2485

Party: Inglis Limited

Counsel
Christopher Kvas
Barrigar & Moss
Suite 1502, 77 Bloor Street West
Toronto, Ontario
M5S 1M2
Telephone: (416) 921-6558
FAX: (416) 923-0760
Agent
Mitchell B. Charness
Ridout & Maybee
18th Flr. 150 Metcalfe St.
Ottawa, Ontario
K2P 1P1
Telephone: (613) 236-1995
FAX: (613) 236-2485

Summary

Keywords

None.

Summary

Case summaries are prepared by the Office of the Registrar of the Supreme Court of Canada (Law Branch). Please note that summaries are not provided to the Judges of the Court. They are placed on the Court file and website for information purposes only.

None.

Lower court rulings

September 9, 1997
Federal Court of Canada, Trial Division

T-2113-96

Respondents' Canadian patent 1,095,734 valid and infringed; permanent injunction against Applicants with respect to patent; Respondents to elect between profits and damages; Applicants' counterclaim dismissed

January 22, 1999
Federal Court of Appeal

A-676-97

Appeal dismissed with costs

Memorandums of argument on application for leave to appeal

The memorandums of argument on an application for leave to appeal will be posted here 30 days after leave to appeal has been granted unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of the memorandum by filing out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.

If you have questions about a memorandum of argument or want to use a memorandum of argument, please contact the author of the memorandum of argument directly. Their name appears at the end of the memorandum of argument. The contact information for counsel is found in the “Counsel” tab of this page.

Downloadable PDFs

Not available

Factums on appeal

The factums of the appellant, the respondent and the intervener will be posted here at least 2 weeks before the hearing unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of factums by filling out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.

If you have questions about a factum or want permission to use a factum, please contact the author of the factum directly. Their contact information appears on the first page of each factum.

Downloadable PDFs

Not available

Webcasts

Not available.

Date modified: 2025-05-13