Case information
Conduct a refined search of the Supreme Court of Canada database to obtain details on the status of a matter before the Court.
29475
Shack Jang Mack, et al. v. Attorney General of Canada
(Ontario) (Civil) (By Leave)
Docket
Judgments on applications for leave to appeal are rendered by the Court, but are not necessarily unanimous.
| Date | Proceeding | Filed By (if applicable) |
|---|---|---|
| 2003-05-05 | Close file on Leave | |
| 2003-04-25 | Judgment on leave sent to the parties | |
| 2003-04-25 | Judgment on leave sent to the parties | |
| 2003-04-25 | Judgment on leave sent to the parties | |
| 2003-04-24 |
Judgment of the Court on the application for leave to appeal, The application for an extension of time is granted and the application for leave to appeal from the judgment of the Court of Appeal for Ontario, Number C36799, dated September 13, 2002, is dismissed. Dismissed |
|
| 2003-04-24 |
Decision on motion to extend time to file and /or serve the leave application Granted |
|
| 2003-02-25 | Response to the motion to extend the time to file and / or serve the leave application, (Letter Form), from P. Vickery dated Feb. 24, 2003 (fax copy), Completed on: 2003-02-25 | Attorney General of Canada |
| 2003-02-24 | All materials on application for leave submitted to the Judges, CJ Ba De | |
| 2003-02-24 | Submission of motion to extend time to file and/ or serve the leave application, CJ Ba De | |
| 2003-02-21 | Motion to extend the time to file and or serve the application for leave to appeal, to file the application to Nov. 18, 2002, Completed on: 2003-02-21 | Shack Jang Mack |
| 2003-02-05 | Letter acknowledging receipt of an incomplete application for leave to appeal | |
| 2002-12-24 | Applicant's reply to respondent's argument, (service by fax and confirmation not received), Incomplete | Shack Jang Mack |
| 2002-12-17 | Respondent's response on the application for leave to appeal, Completed on: 2002-12-17 | Attorney General of Canada |
| 2002-11-18 | Application for leave to appeal, (Vol. 1 to 3)(leave not complying with the new rules - accepted as is on Feb. 25, 2003) - signed formal order of C.A. received Dec. 24, 2002 - form 25B received on Feb. 21, 2003, Completed on: 2003-02-25 | Shack Jang Mack |
Parties
Please note that in the case of closed files, the “Status” column reflects the status of the parties at the time of the proceedings. For more information about the proceedings and about the dates when the file was open, please consult the docket of the case in question.
Main parties
| Name | Role | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Mack, Shack Jang | Applicant | Active |
| Quen Ying Lee and Yew Lee | Applicant | Active |
v.
| Name | Role | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Attorney General of Canada | Respondent | Active |
Counsel
Party: Mack, Shack Jang
Counsel
Avvy Go
133 Lowther Avenue
Toronto, Ontario
M5R 1E4
Telephone: (416) 920-3030
FAX: (416) 920-3033
Agent
220 Laurier Ave W
12th Fl
Ottawa, Ontario
K1P 5Z9
Telephone: (613) 236-9442
FAX: (613) 236-7942
Party: Quen Ying Lee and Yew Lee
Counsel
133 Lowther Avenue
Toronto, Ontario
M5R 1E4
Telephone: (416) 920-3030
FAX: (416) 920-3033
Agent
220 Laurier Ave W
12th Fl
Ottawa, Ontario
K1P 5Z9
Telephone: (613) 236-9442
FAX: (613) 236-7942
Party: Attorney General of Canada
Counsel
William Knight
Cynthia Koller
Room 2341, East Memorial Bldg.
284 Wellington Street
Ottawa, Ontario
K1A 0H8
Telephone: (613) 957-4801
FAX: (613) 952-8713
Agent
Bank of Canada Bldg., 234 Wellington St.
East Tower, Room 1212
Ottawa, Ontario
K1A 0H8
Telephone: (613) 957-4842
FAX: (613) 954-1920
Email: ggarton@justice.gc.ca
Summary
Keywords
None.
Summary
Case summaries are prepared by the Office of the Registrar of the Supreme Court of Canada (Law Branch). Please note that summaries are not provided to the Judges of the Court. They are placed on the Court file and website for information purposes only.
None.
Lower court rulings
Ontario Superior Court of Justice
00-CV-202644
Respondent's motion to strike out the Applicant's statement of claim granted; Applicant's class action seeking redress for the effects of the Chinese Immigration Act dismissed.
Court of Appeal for Ontario
C36799
Appeal dismissed
Memorandums of argument on application for leave to appeal
The memorandums of argument on an application for leave to appeal will be posted here 30 days after leave to appeal has been granted unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of the memorandum by filing out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.
If you have questions about a memorandum of argument or want to use a memorandum of argument, please contact the author of the memorandum of argument directly. Their name appears at the end of the memorandum of argument. The contact information for counsel is found in the “Counsel” tab of this page.
Downloadable PDFs
Not available
Related links
Factums on appeal
The factums of the appellant, the respondent and the intervener will be posted here at least 2 weeks before the hearing unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of factums by filling out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.
If you have questions about a factum or want permission to use a factum, please contact the author of the factum directly. Their contact information appears on the first page of each factum.
Downloadable PDFs
Not available