Skip to main content

Case information

Conduct a refined search of the Supreme Court of Canada database to obtain details on the status of a matter before the Court.


29976

Daryl Milland Clark v. Her Majesty the Queen

(British Columbia) (Criminal) (By Leave)

(Publication ban in case)

Docket

Judgments on applications for leave to appeal are rendered by the Court, but are not necessarily unanimous.

List of proceedings
Date Proceeding Filed By
(if applicable)
2005-03-03 Appeal closed
2005-01-28 Judgment on appeal and notice of deposit of judgment sent to all parties
2005-01-27 Judgment on the appeal rendered, CJ Ma Ba Bi LeB De F Abe Cha, The appeal from the judgment of the Court of Appeal for British Columbia (Vancouver), Number CA029762, 2003 BCCA 408, dated July 9, 2003, heard on November 2, 2004 is allowed, the appellant's conviction is vacated and an acquittal is entered.
Allowed
2004-11-19 Transcript received, (59 pages)
2004-11-02 Judgment reserved OR rendered with reasons to follow
2004-11-02 Supplemental document, One page of Section 173(1) (15 copies) Daryl Milland Clark
2004-11-02 Appellant's condensed book, Submitted in Court (14 copies) Daryl Milland Clark
2004-11-02 Acknowledgement and consent for video taping of proceedings, From all parties
2004-11-02 Hearing of the appeal, 2004-11-02, CJ Ma Ba Bi LeB De F Abe Cha
Judgment reserved
2004-09-30 Order by, LeB, UPON APPLICATION by the Attorney General of Ontario for leave to intervene in the above appeal and pursuant to the order of August 4, 2004;
IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED THAT the said intervener is granted permission to present oral argument not exceeding fifteen (15) minutes at the hearing of the appeal.
Granted
2004-09-29 Book of authorities, Completed on: 2004-09-29 Attorney General of Ontario
2004-09-29 Intervener's factum, Completed on: 2004-09-29 Attorney General of Ontario
2004-09-16 Respondent's book of authorities, Completed on: 2004-09-16 Her Majesty the Queen
2004-09-16 Respondent's factum, Completed on: 2004-09-16 Her Majesty the Queen
2004-08-18 Appeal perfected for hearing
2004-08-04 Order on motion for leave to intervene, (BY LEBEL J.)
2004-08-04 Decision on the motion for leave to intervene, LeB, The motion for leave to intervene of the applicant, the Attorney General of Ontario, is granted and the applicant shall be entitled to serve and file a factum not to exceed 20 pages in length.
The request to present oral argument is deferred to a date following receipt and consideration of the written arguments of the parties and the intervener.
The intervener shall not be entitled to raise new issues or adduce further evidence or otherwise to supplement the record of the parties.
Pursuant to Rule 59(1)(a) the intervener shall pay to the appellant and respondent any additional disbursements occasioned to the appellant and respondent by the intervention.
Granted
2004-08-04 Submission of motion for leave to intervene, LeB
2004-08-04 Decision on motion to extend time, to serve and file the respondent's factum to Sept. 17/04, Reg
Granted
2004-08-04 Submission of motion to extend time, Reg
2004-08-03 Notice of hearing sent to parties
2004-07-30 Motion to extend time, to serve and file the respondent's factum to Sept. 17, Completed on: 2004-07-30 Her Majesty the Queen
2004-07-22 Response to the motion for leave to intervene, from Gowlins, Completed on: 2004-07-22 Daryl Milland Clark
2004-07-21 Response to the motion for leave to intervene, e-mail from Burke-Robertson dated 07/21/04, Completed on: 2004-07-21 Her Majesty the Queen
2004-07-20 Motion for leave to intervene, Completed on: 2004-07-20 Attorney General of Ontario
2004-07-15 Appeal hearing scheduled, 2004-11-02, (previously Nov. 3/04 - Dec. 16/04)
Judgment reserved
2004-07-08 Respondent's record, Completed on: 2004-07-08 Her Majesty the Queen
2004-06-28 Order on motion to extend time
2004-06-28 Decision on motion to extend time, to FURTHER serve and file the appellant's factum and book of authorities to June 23/04, DeRg
Granted
2004-06-28 Submission of motion to extend time, DeRg
2004-06-23 Motion to extend time, to file the factum and authorities to June 23, 2004, Incomplete Daryl Milland Clark
2004-06-23 Appellant's book of authorities, (Motion for ext. of time requested), Completed on: 2004-06-28 Daryl Milland Clark
2004-06-23 Appellant's factum, (Motion for ext. of time requested), Completed on: 2004-06-28 Daryl Milland Clark
2004-05-28 Supplemental document, (12 copies of Supplemental Record) Daryl Milland Clark
2004-05-21 Order on motion to extend time
2004-05-21 Decision on motion to extend time, to serve and file the appellant's factum and book of authorities to June 15/04, DeRg
Granted
2004-05-21 Submission of motion to extend time, DeRg
2004-05-13 Response to motion to extend time, (Letter Form), from Joyce DeWitt-Van Oosten dated 05/04/04, Completed on: 2004-05-13 Her Majesty the Queen
2004-05-13 Motion to extend time, to file the appellant's factum and authorities to June 15, 2004, Completed on: 2004-05-13 Daryl Milland Clark
2004-04-05 Appellant's record, (Vol. I, II), Completed on: 2004-04-05 Daryl Milland Clark
2004-01-29 Letter advising the parties of tentative hearing date and filing deadlines (Leave granted)
2004-01-23 Notice of appeal, Completed on: 2004-01-23 Daryl Milland Clark
2004-01-23 Judgment on leave sent to the parties
2004-01-22 Judgment of the Court on the application for leave to appeal, The application for leave to appeal from the judgment of the Court of Appeal for British Columbia (Vancouver), Number CA029762, dated July 9, 2003, is granted.
Granted
2003-12-08 All materials on application for leave submitted to the Judges, CJ Ma F
2003-10-29 Letter acknowledging receipt of a complete application for leave to appeal
2003-10-21 Respondent's response on the application for leave to appeal, Completed on: 2003-10-21 Her Majesty the Queen
2003-09-29 Application for leave to appeal, (6 copies of reasons of the Court of Appeal filed on Oct. 3/03), Completed on: 2003-10-29 Daryl Milland Clark

Parties

Please note that in the case of closed files, the “Status” column reflects the status of the parties at the time of the proceedings. For more information about the proceedings and about the dates when the file was open, please consult the docket of the case in question.

Main parties

Main parties - Appellants
Name Role Status
Clark, Daryl Milland Appellant Active

v.

Main parties - Respondents
Name Role Status
Her Majesty the Queen Respondent Active

Other parties

Other parties
Name Role Status
Attorney General of Ontario Intervener Active

Counsel

Party: Clark, Daryl Milland

Counsel
Gil D. McKinnon, Q.C.
1500 - 701 West Georgia Street
Vancouver, British Columbia
V6E 4H1
Telephone: (604) 681-7888
FAX: (604) 681-7877
Agent
Brian A. Crane, Q.C.
Gowling WLG (Canada) LLP
2600 - 160 Elgin St
Box 466 Station D
Ottawa, Ontario
K1P 1C3
Telephone: (613) 233-1781
FAX: (613) 563-9869
Email: brian.crane@gowlingwlg.com

Party: Her Majesty the Queen

Counsel
M. Joyce DeWitt-Van Oosten
Kenneth D. Madsen
Attorney General of British Columbia
PO Box 9276 Stn Prov Govt
Victoria, British Columbia
V8W 9J7
Telephone: (250) 387-0284
FAX: (250) 387-0090
Agent
Robert E. Houston, Q.C.
Burke-Robertson
70 Gloucester Street
Ottawa, Ontario
K2P 0A2
Telephone: (613) 566-2058
FAX: (613) 235-4430
Email: rhouston@burkerobertson.com

Party: Attorney General of Ontario

Counsel
Christine Bartlett-Hughes
Attorney General of Ontario
Crown Law Office - Criminal
10th Floor - 720 Bay Street
Toronto, Ontario
M5G 2K1
Telephone: (416) 326-2351
FAX: (416) 326-4656
Email: christine.bartlett-hughes@jus.gov.on.ca
Agent
Robert E. Houston, Q.C.
Burke-Robertson
70 Gloucester Street
Ottawa, Ontario
K2P 0A2
Telephone: (613) 566-2058
FAX: (613) 235-4430
Email: rhouston@burkerobertson.com

Summary

Keywords

None.

Summary

Case summaries are prepared by the Office of the Registrar of the Supreme Court of Canada (Law Branch). Please note that summaries are not provided to the Judges of the Court. They are placed on the Court file and website for information purposes only.

The Court of Appeal set out the following facts. Between nine and ten p.m. on the evening of October 28, 2000, the complainant were watching television with their two daughters, aged five and seven, while sitting on a couch that faces a sliding glass patio door on the ground level of their home. The patio door faced toward the Appellant’s living room window. His curtains were open and his living room was brightly lit. She alerted her husband. They concluded he was masturbating and moving from side to side to maintain a view of something. They became concerned that he was looking in the direction of their children. Mrs. S. also observed the Appellant get up on a stool which made him more visible. The police were summoned. Corporal Hogg observed the Appellant engaging in the same behaviour, first from the same bedroom window inside the S.’s home and then from the Appellant’s backyard. Corporal Hogg shone his flashlight in the direction of the Appellant and flickered it to get his attention. The Appellant immediately retreated from the window and turned off his living room lights. Eventually, after repeated knocking at the door, the police were admitted and the Appellant was arrested.

The Appellant was charged with one count under s. 173(1)(a) of wilfully doing an indecent act, masturbating, in a public place, in the presence of one or more persons and one count under s. 173(1)(b) of wilfully doing an indecent act, masturbating, in a place, a dwelling house, with intent to insult or offend any person . The Provincial Court judge convicted the Appellant only on the charge under s. 173(1)(a) in summary conviction proceedings. The Appellant was sentenced to four months of jail. The Supreme Court of British Columbia, on summary conviction appeal, affirmed the conviction. The Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal from the Supreme Court of British Columbia.

Lower court rulings

March 27, 2002
Supreme Court of British Columbia

48478V

Appellant convicted of wilfully doing an indecent act in public contrary to s. 173(1)(a) of the Criminal Code

July 9, 2003
Court of Appeal for British Columbia (Vancouver)

CA029762

Appellant's appeal against conviction dismissed

Memorandums of argument on application for leave to appeal

The memorandums of argument on an application for leave to appeal will be posted here 30 days after leave to appeal has been granted unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of the memorandum by filing out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.

If you have questions about a memorandum of argument or want to use a memorandum of argument, please contact the author of the memorandum of argument directly. Their name appears at the end of the memorandum of argument. The contact information for counsel is found in the “Counsel” tab of this page.

Downloadable PDFs

Not available

Factums on appeal

The factums of the appellant, the respondent and the intervener will be posted here at least 2 weeks before the hearing unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of factums by filling out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.

If you have questions about a factum or want permission to use a factum, please contact the author of the factum directly. Their contact information appears on the first page of each factum.

Downloadable PDFs

Not available

Webcasts

Not available.

Date modified: 2025-05-13