Skip to main content

Case information

Conduct a refined search of the Supreme Court of Canada database to obtain details on the status of a matter before the Court.


30237

Ernst & Young, et al. v. Fraser Milner Casgrain, s.e.n.c., et al.

(Quebec) (Civil) (By Leave)

Docket

Judgments on applications for leave to appeal are rendered by the Court, but are not necessarily unanimous.

List of proceedings
Date Proceeding Filed By
(if applicable)
2005-02-02 Close file on Leave
2004-10-08 Judgment on leave sent to the parties
2004-10-07 Judgment of the Court on the application for leave to appeal, The application for leave to appeal from the judgment of the Court of Appeal of Quebec (Quebec), Number 500-09-014170-047, dated February 16, 2004, is dismissed with costs.
Dismissed, with costs
2004-08-09 All materials on application for leave submitted to the Judges, Ba LeB De
2004-07-13 Correspondence received from, Vikki Andrighetti dated 07/13/04 re: motion to stay be held in abeyance pending further notice Ernst & Young
2004-07-12 Correspondence received from, Vikki Andrighetti dated 07/07/04 re: submission of the motion for stay Ernst & Young
2004-06-14 Correspondence received from, V. Andrighetti dated June 14, 2004 re: requesting to hold the motion to stay in abeyance until further notice (fax copy - original rec'd June 17/04) Ernst & Young
2004-06-11 Motion for a stay of execution, 3 copies - book form, Completed on: 2004-06-11 Ernst & Young
2004-04-28 Letter acknowledging receipt of a complete application for leave to appeal
2004-04-26 Applicant's reply to respondent's argument, Completed on: 2004-04-26 Ernst & Young
2004-04-19 Respondent's response on the application for leave to appeal, Completed on: 2004-04-19 Fraser Milner Casgrain, s.e.n.c.
2004-03-22 Application for leave to appeal, (2 volumes), Completed on: 2004-03-22 Ernst & Young

Parties

Please note that in the case of closed files, the “Status” column reflects the status of the parties at the time of the proceedings. For more information about the proceedings and about the dates when the file was open, please consult the docket of the case in question.

Main parties

Main parties - Appellants
Name Role Status
Ernst & Young Applicant Active
Nicolas Beaudin, Alain Roberge, Richard Epstein, Daniel Garant, Jean-Pierre Huard and Patrice Beaudin Applicant Active

v.

Main parties - Respondents
Name Role Status
Fraser Milner Casgrain, s.e.n.c. Respondent Active
Fraser Milner Casgrain, LLP Respondent Active

Counsel

Party: Ernst & Young

Counsel
James A. Woods
David Simon
Vikki Andrighetti
Christian Immer
Woods & Partners
1100 - 2000 McGill College Avenue
Montreal, Quebec
H3A 3H3
Telephone: (514) 982-4503
FAX: (514) 284-2046
Email: jwoods@woods.qc.ca

Party: Nicolas Beaudin, Alain Roberge, Richard Epstein, Daniel Garant, Jean-Pierre Huard and Patrice Beaudin

Counsel
James A. Woods
David Simon
Vikki Andrighetti
Woods & Partners
1100 - 2000 McGill College Avenue
Montreal, Quebec
H3A 3H3
Telephone: (514) 982-4503
FAX: (514) 284-2046
Email: jwoods@woods.qc.ca

Party: Fraser Milner Casgrain, s.e.n.c.

Counsel
Raynold Langlois, c.r.
Martine Riendeau
Langlois Kronström Desjardins
1002, rue Sherbrooke O
28e étage
Montréal, Quebec
H3A 3L6
Telephone: (514) 842-9512
FAX: (514) 845-6573
Email: raynold.langlois@lkdnet.com

Party: Fraser Milner Casgrain, LLP

Counsel
Raynold Langlois, c.r.
Martine Riendeau
Langlois Kronström Desjardins
1002, rue Sherbrooke O
28e étage
Montréal, Quebec
H3A 3L6
Telephone: (514) 842-9512
FAX: (514) 845-6573
Email: raynold.langlois@lkdnet.com

Summary

Keywords

None.

Summary

Case summaries are prepared by the Office of the Registrar of the Supreme Court of Canada (Law Branch). Please note that summaries are not provided to the Judges of the Court. They are placed on the Court file and website for information purposes only.

None.

Lower court rulings

January 5, 2004
Superior Court of Quebec

500-17-015823-035

Applicants' motion to dismiss respondents' action on the basis of a breach of the implied undertaking rule dismissed

February 16, 2004
Court of Appeal of Quebec (Québec)

500-09-014170-047

Applicants' application for leave to appeal dismissed

Memorandums of argument on application for leave to appeal

The memorandums of argument on an application for leave to appeal will be posted here 30 days after leave to appeal has been granted unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of the memorandum by filing out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.

If you have questions about a memorandum of argument or want to use a memorandum of argument, please contact the author of the memorandum of argument directly. Their name appears at the end of the memorandum of argument. The contact information for counsel is found in the “Counsel” tab of this page.

Downloadable PDFs

Not available

Factums on appeal

The factums of the appellant, the respondent and the intervener will be posted here at least 2 weeks before the hearing unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of factums by filling out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.

If you have questions about a factum or want permission to use a factum, please contact the author of the factum directly. Their contact information appears on the first page of each factum.

Downloadable PDFs

Not available

Webcasts

Not available.

Date modified: 2025-02-27