Skip to main content

Case information

Conduct a refined search of the Supreme Court of Canada database to obtain details on the status of a matter before the Court.


32200

Novopharm Limited v. Janssen-Ortho Inc., et al.

(Federal) (Civil) (By Leave)

Docket

Judgments on applications for leave to appeal are rendered by the Court, but are not necessarily unanimous.

List of proceedings
Date Proceeding Filed By
(if applicable)
2007-12-07 Close file on Leave
2007-12-07 Copy of formal judgment sent to Registrar of the Court of Appeal and all parties
2007-12-07 Judgment on leave sent to the parties
2007-12-06 Judgment of the Court on the application for leave to appeal, The application for leave to appeal from the judgment of the Federal Court of Appeal, Number A-500-06, 2007 FCA 217, dated June 7, 2007, is dismissed with costs.
Dismissed, with costs
2007-11-05 All materials on application for leave submitted to the Judges, CJ F Ro
2007-10-09 Applicant's reply to respondent's argument, Completed on: 2007-10-09 Novopharm Limited
2007-10-01 Book of authorities Janssen-Ortho Inc.
2007-09-28 Respondent's response on the application for leave to appeal, Completed on: 2007-09-28 Janssen-Ortho Inc.
2007-08-30 Letter acknowledging receipt of a complete application for leave to appeal
2007-08-29 Correspondence received from, Marcus Klee dated August 29, 2007. Re: Similar to 31881 Novopharm Limited
2007-08-29 Book of authorities, (2 volumes) Novopharm Limited
2007-08-29 Application for leave to appeal, Completed on: 2007-08-30 Novopharm Limited

Parties

Please note that in the case of closed files, the “Status” column reflects the status of the parties at the time of the proceedings. For more information about the proceedings and about the dates when the file was open, please consult the docket of the case in question.

Main parties

Main parties - Appellants
Name Role Status
Novopharm Limited Applicant Active

v.

Main parties - Respondents
Name Role Status
Janssen-Ortho Inc. Respondent Active
Daiichi Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. Respondent Active

Counsel

Party: Novopharm Limited

Counsel
Names
David W. Aitken
Marcus Klee
Contact information
Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP
340 Albert Street
Suite 1900
Ottawa, Ontario
K1R 7Y6
Telephone: (613) 235-7234
FAX: (613) 235-2867

Party: Janssen-Ortho Inc.

Counsel
Names
Neil Belmore
Lindsay Neidrauer
Contact information
Gowling WLG (Canada) LLP
1 First Canadian Place
Suite 1600, 100 King Street West
Toronto, Ontario
M5X 1G5
Telephone: (416) 862-5725
FAX: (416) 862-7661
Email: neil.belmore@gowlings.com
Agent
Name
Henry S. Brown, Q.C.
Contact information
Gowling WLG (Canada) LLP
2600 - 160 Elgin St
P.O. Box 466, Stn "D"
Ottawa, Ontario
K1P 1C3
Telephone: (613) 233-1781
FAX: (613) 788-3433
Email: henry.brown@gowlings.com

Party: Daiichi Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.

Counsel
Name
Michael E. Charles
Contact information
Bereskin & Parr
40th Floor, Scotia Plaza
40 King Street West
Toronto, Ontario
M5H 3Y2
Telephone: (416) 957-1689
FAX: (416) 361-1398
Email: mcharles@bereskinparr.com
Agent
Name
Henry S. Brown, Q.C.
Contact information
Gowling WLG (Canada) LLP
2600 - 160 Elgin St
P.O. Box 466, Stn "D"
Ottawa, Ontario
K1P 1C3
Telephone: (613) 233-1781
FAX: (613) 788-3433
Email: henry.brown@gowlings.com

Summary

Keywords

None.

Summary

Case summaries are prepared by the Office of the Registrar of the Supreme Court of Canada (Law Branch). Please note that summaries are not provided to the Judges of the Court. They are placed on the Court file and website for information purposes only.

Intellectual property - Patents - Medicines - Whether the law of selection patents confers a second monopoly to a compound on the basis of properties that are the same as those of the genus from which the compound was selected - Whether “motivation” to select a previously disclosed compound should be imported into and given central importance in the test for obviousness - Whether the unpredictability of the properties of a previously disclosed compound permit an otherwise obvious invention to be the subject of a second monopoly - Whether a second monopoly may be granted for a compound disclosed in the prior art on the basis that routine testing is required to enable the invention - Whether a selection patent should be exempt from the requirement that the claims be unambiguous.

Daiichi Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. (“Daiichi”) discovered ofloxacin, an antimicrobial drug used in the treatment of infections and obtained a patent for it in the early 1980s that expired in 2001. Ofloxacin is a racemic compound with a single chiral centre, a junction where there are two identical, three-dimensional molecules called enantiomers or optical isomers that are mirror images of each other. The right hand or dextro version is called (+) ofloxacin and the left or levo side is called (-) ofloxacin or “levofloxacin”. Further, the configuration of the enantiomers can be chemically described as being either “S” or “R”. After the discovery of ofloxacin, researchers at Daiichi experimented with techniques to isolate or resolve its enantiomers from the racemic compound. Their research indicated that the “S(-)” enantiomer had twice the antimicrobial activity, was less toxic, and was more soluble than the racemic compound. In 1986, Daiichi filed a patent application for levofloxacin which became Canadian Patent 1,304,080 (the “080” patent in 1992. This patent will expire in June 2009. Janssen-Ortho Inc. (“Janssen”), Daiichi’s Canadian licencee, markets and sells levofloxacin in Canada. In 2004, the Applicant, Novopharm Limited (“Novopharm”), obtained a notice of compliance from the Minister of Health, which allowed it to market its generic version of levofloxacin in Canada. In Daiichi’s prohibition proceedings launched under the Patented Medicines (Notice of Compliance) Regulations, Novopharm was successful in establishing that the 080 patent was void for obviousness and anticipation. When Novopharm began marketing its product, however, Janssen and Daiichi commenced infringement proceedings. In dispute was the validity of claim 4 of the 080 patent.

Lower court rulings

October 17, 2006
Federal Court of Canada, Trial Division

T-2175-04, 2006 FC 1234

See file

June 7, 2007
Federal Court of Appeal

A-500-06, 2007 FCA 217

See file

Filed documents

The memorandums of argument on an application for leave to appeal will be posted here 30 days after leave to appeal has been granted unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of the memorandum by filling out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.

If you have questions about a memorandum of argument or want to use a memorandum of argument, please contact the author of the memorandum of argument directly. Their name appears at the end of the memorandum of argument. The contact information for counsel is found in the “Counsel” tab of this page.

Downloadable PDFs

Not available

The factums of the appellant, the respondent and the intervener will be posted here at least 2 weeks before the hearing unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of factums by filling out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.

If you have questions about a factum or want permission to use a factum, please contact the author of the factum directly. Their contact information appears on the first page of each factum.

Downloadable PDFs

Not available

The condensed books of the appellant, the respondent and the intervener will be posted here upon receipt of the electronic version, 2 days prior to the scheduled appeal hearing. You may also obtain copies of condensed books by filling out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.

If you have questions about a condensed book or want permission to use a condensed book, please contact the author of the condensed book directly. Their contact information appears on the first page of each condensed book.

Downloadable PDFs

Not available

Webcasts

Not available.

Date modified: 2025-02-27