Skip to main content

Case information

Conduct a refined search of the Supreme Court of Canada database to obtain details on the status of a matter before the Court.


33656

Warren Nigel Abbey v. Her Majesty the Queen

(Ontario) (Criminal) (By Leave)

Docket

Judgments on applications for leave to appeal are rendered by the Court, but are not necessarily unanimous.

List of proceedings
Date Proceeding Filed By
(if applicable)
2010-07-12 Close file on Leave
2010-07-09 Copy of formal judgment sent to Registrar of the Court of Appeal and all parties
2010-07-09 Judgment on leave sent to the parties
2010-07-08 Judgment of the Court on the application for leave to appeal, The motion for an extension of time to serve and file the application for leave to appeal is granted. The application for leave to appeal from the judgment of the Court of Appeal for Ontario, Number C47020, 2009 ONCA 624, dated August 27, 2009, is dismissed without costs.
Dismissed, without costs
2010-07-08 Decision on motion to extend time to file and /or serve the leave application
Granted
2010-06-16 Order on motion to extend time
2010-06-16 Decision on motion to extend time, to serve and file the applicant's reply to June 2/10, Reg
Granted
2010-06-16 Submission of motion to extend time, Reg
2010-06-16 Response to motion to extend time, Completed on: 2010-06-14 Her Majesty the Queen
2010-06-14 All materials on application for leave submitted to the Judges, CJ Abe Cro
2010-06-14 Submission of motion to extend time to file and/ or serve the leave application, CJ Abe Cro
2010-06-14 Motion to extend time, to serve and file the reply to June 2/10 (book form) (draft order requested - rec'd by e-mail), Completed on: 2010-06-16 Warren Nigel Abbey
2010-06-02 Applicant's reply to respondent's argument, Ext. of time requested - rec'd June 14/10, Completed on: 2010-06-14 Warren Nigel Abbey
2010-05-13 Response to the motion to extend the time to file and / or serve the leave application, (included in the response), Completed on: 2010-05-13 Her Majesty the Queen
2010-05-13 Respondent's response on the application for leave to appeal, (response to the extension of time included), Completed on: 2010-05-13 Her Majesty the Queen
2010-05-13 Correspondence received from, R. Schwartz dated May 13/10 re: will file response to both leave application and extension of time and ask the Court to expedite this matter (by fax) Her Majesty the Queen
2010-04-20 Letter acknowledging receipt of an incomplete application for leave to appeal
2010-04-16 Motion to extend the time to file and or serve the application for leave to appeal, Completed on: 2010-04-16 Warren Nigel Abbey
2010-04-16 Application for leave to appeal, (5 volumes) 3 copies Vol.1 missing (rec'd April 20-10), Completed on: 2010-05-04 Warren Nigel Abbey

Parties

Please note that in the case of closed files, the “Status” column reflects the status of the parties at the time of the proceedings. For more information about the proceedings and about the dates when the file was open, please consult the docket of the case in question.

Main parties

Main parties - Appellants
Name Role Status
Abbey, Warren Nigel Applicant Active

v.

Main parties - Respondents
Name Role Status
Her Majesty the Queen Respondent Active

Counsel

Party: Abbey, Warren Nigel

Counsel
Names
James C. Morton
Doug Gosbee
Contact information
Steinberg Morton Hope & Israel LLP
1100 - 5255 Yonge Street
North York, Ontario
M2N 6P4
Telephone: (416) 225-2777 Ext: 230
FAX: (416) 225-7112
Email: jmorton@smhilaw.com

Party: Her Majesty the Queen

Counsel
Name
Randy Schwartz
Contact information
Attorney General of Ontario
720 Bay Street, 10th Floor
Toronto, Ontario
M5G 2K1
Telephone: (416) 326-4586
FAX: (416) 326-4656
Email: randy.schwartz@ontario.ca
Agent
Name
Robert E. Houston, Q.C.
Contact information
Burke-Robertson
70 Gloucester Street
Ottawa, Ontario
K2P 0A2
Telephone: (613) 566-2058
FAX: (613) 235-4430
Email: rhouston@burkerobertson.com

Summary

Keywords

None.

Summary

Case summaries are prepared by the Office of the Registrar of the Supreme Court of Canada (Law Branch). Please note that summaries are not provided to the Judges of the Court. They are placed on the Court file and website for information purposes only.

Criminal law – Evidence – Admissibility – Expert opinion evidence – Hearsay – Whether the test for allowing expert evidence is the test enunciated in R. v. Mohan, [1994] 2 S.C.R. 9, or the new two stage test set out by the Court of Appeal for Ontario – Whether it is proper to admit qualitative versus quantitative expert evidence, and hearsay within qualitative expert evidence, that is not subject to error rates or scientific methodology – Whether an expert may rely on otherwise inadmissible hearsay without independent proof.

In 2004, the Malvern and the Galloway Boys, two street gangs in Scarborough Ontario, were engaged in a turf war. Any sighting of a Galloway Boy in Malvern territory prompted a potentially fatal reaction. The applicant was accused of fatally shooting Simeon Peter, a Scarborough resident. The Crown argued that the applicant, a Malvern associate, mistakenly believed that Mr. Peter was a Galloway Boy who had robbed him some months before and he shot him both for revenge and because he was in Malvern territory. Four or five months after the shooting, the applicant had a teardrop tattoo inscribed on his face. The Crown's theory is that a teardrop tattoo on the face of a young male member of an urban street gang signifies only one of three things: 1) the death of a fellow gang member or a family member; 2) that the bearer has been incarcerated in a correctional facility for a year; or 3) that the bearer has murdered a rival gang member. The only option for the applicant would be to signify a rival gang member's murder. Hearings were held to determine whether to admit evidence as to the meaning of a teardrop tattoo from three Malvern gang members, a police officer with experience with gangs, and from Dr. Totten who is a sociologist agreed to be an expert in the culture of Canadian street gangs.

Lower court rulings

February 20, 2007
Ontario Superior Court of Justice

2006 CanLII 41814

Opinion evidence excluded

March 29, 2007
Ontario Superior Court of Justice


Applicant acquitted by jury of first degree murder

August 27, 2009
Court of Appeal for Ontario

C47020, 2009 ONCA 624

Acquittal quashed and new trial ordered

Filed documents

The memorandums of argument on an application for leave to appeal will be posted here 30 days after leave to appeal has been granted unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of the memorandum by filling out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.

If you have questions about a memorandum of argument or want to use a memorandum of argument, please contact the author of the memorandum of argument directly. Their name appears at the end of the memorandum of argument. The contact information for counsel is found in the “Counsel” tab of this page.

Downloadable PDFs

Not available

The factums of the appellant, the respondent and the intervener will be posted here at least 2 weeks before the hearing unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of factums by filling out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.

If you have questions about a factum or want permission to use a factum, please contact the author of the factum directly. Their contact information appears on the first page of each factum.

Downloadable PDFs

Not available

The condensed books of the appellant, the respondent and the intervener will be posted here upon receipt of the electronic version, 2 days prior to the scheduled appeal hearing. You may also obtain copies of condensed books by filling out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.

If you have questions about a condensed book or want permission to use a condensed book, please contact the author of the condensed book directly. Their contact information appears on the first page of each condensed book.

Downloadable PDFs

Not available

Webcasts

Not available.

Date modified: 2025-02-27