Case information
Conduct a refined search of the Supreme Court of Canada database to obtain details on the status of a matter before the Court.
34437
Sam Nop v. Her Majesty the Queen
(Ontario) (Criminal) (By Leave)
Docket
Judgments on applications for leave to appeal are rendered by the Court, but are not necessarily unanimous.
| Date | Proceeding | Filed By (if applicable) |
|---|---|---|
| 2011-12-19 | Close file on Leave | |
| 2011-12-09 | Copy of formal judgment sent to Registrar of the Court of Appeal and all parties | |
| 2011-12-09 | Judgment on leave sent to the parties | |
| 2011-12-08 |
Judgment of the Court on the application for leave to appeal, The motion for an extension of time to serve and file the application for leave to appeal is granted. The application for leave to appeal from the judgment of the Court of Appeal for Ontario, Number C47289, 2011 ONCA 64, dated January 24, 2011 is dismissed without costs. Dismissed, without costs |
|
| 2011-12-08 |
Decision on motion to extend time to file and /or serve the leave application Granted |
|
| 2011-11-14 | All materials on application for leave submitted to the Judges, CJ Ro Mo | |
| 2011-11-14 | Submission of motion to extend time to file and/ or serve the leave application, CJ Ro Mo | |
| 2011-10-19 | Respondent's response on the application for leave to appeal, Completed on: 2011-10-19 | Her Majesty the Queen |
| 2011-09-20 | Letter acknowledging receipt of an incomplete application for leave to appeal and without formal Court of Appeal order | |
| 2011-09-19 | Supplemental document, (Charge to the Jury) | Sam Nop |
| 2011-09-19 | Motion to extend the time to file and or serve the application for leave to appeal, (Inlcuded in the application), Completed on: 2011-09-19 | Sam Nop |
| 2011-09-19 | Application for leave to appeal, Final C/A order missing (rec'd Oct.24, 2011), (Motion to extend time included in the application) Final order form received Oct. 3, 2011, Completed on: 2011-10-25 | Sam Nop |
Parties
Please note that in the case of closed files, the “Status” column reflects the status of the parties at the time of the proceedings. For more information about the proceedings and about the dates when the file was open, please consult the docket of the case in question.
Main parties
| Name | Role | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Nop, Sam | Applicant | Active |
v.
| Name | Role | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Her Majesty the Queen | Respondent | Active |
Counsel
Party: Nop, Sam
Counsel
Toronto, Ontario
M5C 1G8
Telephone: (416) 363-0700
FAX: (416) 366-1762
Email: jwilkinson@crimadvocate.com
Agent
2600 - 160 Elgin St
Box 466 Station D
Ottawa, Ontario
K1P 1C3
Telephone: (613) 233-1781
FAX: (613) 563-9869
Email: brian.crane@gowlingwlg.com
Party: Her Majesty the Queen
Counsel
Gregory J. Tweney
720 Bay Street
10th Floor
Toronto, Ontario
M5G 2K1
Telephone: (416) 326-4604
FAX: (416) 326-4656
Email: jennifer.woollcombe@ontario.ca
Agent
70 Gloucester Street
Ottawa, Ontario
K2P 0A2
Telephone: (613) 566-2058
FAX: (613) 235-4430
Email: rhouston@burkerobertson.com
Summary
Keywords
None.
Summary
Case summaries are prepared by the Office of the Registrar of the Supreme Court of Canada (Law Branch). Please note that summaries are not provided to the Judges of the Court. They are placed on the Court file and website for information purposes only.
Criminal law – Second degree murder – Evidence – Admissibility – Post-offence conduct - Vetrovec warning – Whether the Court of Appeal erred by concluding that the conduct of the defence did not constitute an effective, binding admission of guilt with respect to the lesser and included offence of manslaughter and that therefore the evidence of the accused’s post-event conduct was properly admissible to determine his level of culpability – Whether the Court of Appeal erred in holding that the evidence of a mixed Vetrovec witness whose evidence was capable of raising a reasonable doubt about the accused’s guilt, was properly subject to an instruction to the jury that independent corroboration should be sought before relying on the evidence
A group of students from Hamilton attended a party in Burlington and were ejected from the party by the victim, Daly. The Hamilton group returned home, increased their numbers, obtained weapons and drove back to Burlington. Daly encountered the group as he walked home. A man ran up behind Daly and dragged him to a grassy area where four other attackers joined in, beating Daly with bats and sticks. After a minute, four attackers ran away while the fifth remained to deliver more blows. The attackers fled, leaving Daly unconscious. He was pronounced dead at hospital. Five individuals were charged in relation to the incident. One of the five, Hodzic, pleaded guilty to manslaughter at a separate trial. Another attacker, Papadopoulos, was also found guilty of manslaughter. Nop, Chak and Mujku all had their manslaughter pleas rejected. Evidence was admitted that Chak set fire to a bat used in the attack after the incident and that Nop, Chak and Papdopoulos lied to police and encouraged others to do the same.
Nop, Chak and Mujku were convicted of second degree murder. Their appeals to the Court of Appeal were dismissed. Only Nop seeks leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada.
Lower court rulings
Ontario Superior Court of Justice
Applicant convicted of second degree murder
Court of Appeal for Ontario
2011 ONCA 64, C47289
Conviction appeal dismissed
Filed documents
The memorandums of argument on an application for leave to appeal will be posted here 30 days after leave to appeal has been granted unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of the memorandum by filling out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.
If you have questions about a memorandum of argument or want to use a memorandum of argument, please contact the author of the memorandum of argument directly. Their name appears at the end of the memorandum of argument. The contact information for counsel is found in the “Counsel” tab of this page.
Downloadable PDFs
Not available
Related links
The factums of the appellant, the respondent and the intervener will be posted here at least 2 weeks before the hearing unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of factums by filling out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.
If you have questions about a factum or want permission to use a factum, please contact the author of the factum directly. Their contact information appears on the first page of each factum.
Downloadable PDFs
Not available
Related links
The condensed books of the appellant, the respondent and the intervener will be posted here upon receipt of the electronic version, 2 days prior to the scheduled appeal hearing. You may also obtain copies of condensed books by filling out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.
If you have questions about a condensed book or want permission to use a condensed book, please contact the author of the condensed book directly. Their contact information appears on the first page of each condensed book.
Downloadable PDFs
Not available