Case information
Conduct a refined search of the Supreme Court of Canada database to obtain details on the status of a matter before the Court.
35426
Karl Anthony Wilson v. Attorney General of Canada representing Correctional Services Canada
(Nova Scotia) (Civil) (By Leave)
Docket
Judgments on applications for leave to appeal are rendered by the Court, but are not necessarily unanimous.
| Date | Proceeding | Filed By (if applicable) |
|---|---|---|
| 2013-11-26 | Close file on Leave | |
| 2013-11-22 | Copy of formal judgment sent to Registrar of the Court of Appeal and all parties | |
| 2013-11-22 | Judgment on leave sent to the parties | |
| 2013-11-21 |
Judgment of the Court on the application for leave to appeal, The application for leave to appeal from the judgment of the Nova Scotia Court of Appeal, Number CA 370532, 2013 NSCA 49, dated April 24, 2013, is dismissed without costs. Dismissed, without costs |
|
| 2013-10-21 | All materials on application for leave submitted to the Judges, CJ Cro Wa | |
| 2013-08-23 | Respondent's response on the application for leave to appeal, (Book Form), Completed on: 2013-08-23 | Attorney General of Canada representing Correctional Services Canada |
| 2013-06-26 | Letter acknowledging receipt of an incomplete application for leave to appeal | |
| 2013-06-24 | Correspondence (sent by the Court) to, Acknowledgment letter | |
| 2013-06-21 | Application for leave to appeal, 1 copy missing - Rec'd on July 8, 2013, Completed on: 2013-07-08 | Karl Anthony Wilson |
Parties
Please note that in the case of closed files, the “Status” column reflects the status of the parties at the time of the proceedings. For more information about the proceedings and about the dates when the file was open, please consult the docket of the case in question.
Main parties
| Name | Role | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Wilson, Karl Anthony | Applicant | Active |
v.
| Name | Role | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Attorney General of Canada representing Correctional Services Canada | Respondent | Active |
Counsel
Party: Wilson, Karl Anthony
This party is not represented by counsel.
Party: Attorney General of Canada representing Correctional Services Canada
Counsel
5251 Duke Street
Suite 1400
Halifax, Nova Scotia
B3J 1P3
Telephone: (902) 426-7669
FAX: (902) 426-8796
Email: sarah.drodge@justice.gc.ca
Agent
50 O'Connor Street, Suite 50, Room 557
Ottawa, Ontario
K1P 6L2
Telephone: (613) 670-6290
FAX: (613) 954-1920
Email: christopher.rupar@justice.gc.ca
Summary
Keywords
None.
Summary
Case summaries are prepared by the Office of the Registrar of the Supreme Court of Canada (Law Branch). Please note that summaries are not provided to the Judges of the Court. They are placed on the Court file and website for information purposes only.
Courts – Appeals – Habeas corpus jurisdiction – Criminal law – Administrative law – Judicial review – Interrelationship between the habeas corpus remedy and the statutory parole scheme – Whether the provincial superior court erred in failing to exercise its jurisdiction to hear the application for a writ of habeas corpus – Whether the Corrections and Conditional Release Act, S.C. 1992, c. 20 (“CCRA”) constitutes a complete, comprehensive and expert procedure for review of an administrative decision – Whether the courts misapplied May v. Ferndale, [2005] 3 S.C.R. 809 and R. v. Miller, [1985] 2 S.C.R. 613 – Whether the lower court decisions did not take into account that judicial review is limited to the record which was before the federal decision-maker and is not the determination, by trial de novo, of questions not adequately canvassed in evidence before the initial decision-maker.
The applicant unsuccessfully applied to the National Parole Board (the “Board”) for day parole. He appealed the decision of the Day Parole Panel to the Appeal Division of the Board under the statutory appeal provisions of the CCRA. The appeal was dismissed. He then filed an internal complaint under the Correctional Services Canada Complaints and Grievance Process and brought an application for a writ of habeas corpus with certiorari in aid. He argued, inter alia, that the Board had erred in failing to consider recommendations in a Psychological/Psychiatric Assessment Report received after the completion of his Community Assessment Report. He also argued that the Board erred in considering his alleged involvement in the institutional drug trade, which he had denied.
The Supreme Court of Nova Scotia declined to exercise its habeas corpus jurisdiction and dismissed the applicant’s application. The Court of Appeal of Nova Scotia dismissed his appeal.
Lower court rulings
Supreme Court of Nova Scotia, Trial Division
Amh. No. 342924, 2011 NSSC 143
Court declined to exercise its habeas corpus jurisdiction and the applicant’s application was dismissed
Nova Scotia Court of Appeal
CA 370532, 2013 NSCA 49
Appeal dismissed
Filed documents
The memorandums of argument on an application for leave to appeal will be posted here 30 days after leave to appeal has been granted unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of the memorandum by filling out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.
If you have questions about a memorandum of argument or want to use a memorandum of argument, please contact the author of the memorandum of argument directly. Their name appears at the end of the memorandum of argument. The contact information for counsel is found in the “Counsel” tab of this page.
Downloadable PDFs
Not available
Related links
The factums of the appellant, the respondent and the intervener will be posted here at least 2 weeks before the hearing unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of factums by filling out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.
If you have questions about a factum or want permission to use a factum, please contact the author of the factum directly. Their contact information appears on the first page of each factum.
Downloadable PDFs
Not available
Related links
The condensed books of the appellant, the respondent and the intervener will be posted here upon receipt of the electronic version, 2 days prior to the scheduled appeal hearing. You may also obtain copies of condensed books by filling out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.
If you have questions about a condensed book or want permission to use a condensed book, please contact the author of the condensed book directly. Their contact information appears on the first page of each condensed book.
Downloadable PDFs
Not available