Case information
Conduct a refined search of the Supreme Court of Canada database to obtain details on the status of a matter before the Court.
35537
Ruben Pinnock v. Her Majesty the Queen
(Ontario) (Criminal) (By Leave)
Docket
Judgments on applications for leave to appeal are rendered by the Court, but are not necessarily unanimous.
| Date | Proceeding | Filed By (if applicable) |
|---|---|---|
| 2013-12-17 | Close file on Leave | |
| 2013-12-13 | Copy of formal judgment sent to Registrar of the Court of Appeal and all parties | |
| 2013-12-13 | Judgment on leave sent to the parties | |
| 2013-12-12 |
Judgment of the Court on the application for leave to appeal, The motion for an extension of time to serve and file the application for leave to appeal is granted. The application for leave to appeal from the judgment of the Court of Appeal for Ontario, Number C49887, 2013 ONCA 190, dated April 2, 2013, is dismissed without costs. Dismissed, without costs |
|
| 2013-12-12 |
Decision on motion to extend time to file and /or serve the leave application, See judgment on leave application Granted |
|
| 2013-11-18 | All materials on application for leave submitted to the Judges, Abe Ro Mo | |
| 2013-11-18 | Submission of motion to extend time to file and/ or serve the leave application, Abe Ro Mo | |
| 2013-11-04 | Applicant's reply to respondent's argument, (Letter Form), Completed on: 2013-11-04 | Ruben Pinnock |
| 2013-10-23 | Respondent's response on the application for leave to appeal, (Book Form), Joint with 35533, 35535, Completed on: 2013-10-23 | Her Majesty the Queen |
| 2013-10-23 | Response to the motion to extend the time to file and / or serve the leave application, Included in response, Completed on: 2013-10-23 | Ruben Pinnock |
| 2013-09-24 | Letter acknowledging receipt of an incomplete application for leave to appeal | |
| 2013-09-23 | Motion to extend the time to file and or serve the application for leave to appeal, (Book Form), Included in application, Completed on: 2013-09-23 | Her Majesty the Queen |
| 2013-09-23 | Application for leave to appeal, (Book Form), Fee missing (rec'd 2013-09-24), Completed on: 2013-09-27 | Ruben Pinnock |
Parties
Please note that in the case of closed files, the “Status” column reflects the status of the parties at the time of the proceedings. For more information about the proceedings and about the dates when the file was open, please consult the docket of the case in question.
Main parties
| Name | Role | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Pinnock, Ruben | Applicant | Active |
v.
| Name | Role | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Her Majesty the Queen | Respondent | Active |
Counsel
Party: Pinnock, Ruben
Counsel
Ariel Herscovitch
302 - 559 College Street
Toronto, Ontario
M6G 1A9
Telephone: (416) 304-1414
FAX: (416) 304-1345
Email: derstine@derstinepenman.com
Agent
100 - 340 Gilmour Street
Ottawa, Ontario
K2P 0R3
Telephone: (613) 695-8855 Ext: 102
FAX: (613) 695-8580
Email: tslade@supremeadvocacy.ca
Party: Her Majesty the Queen
Counsel
Benita Wassenaar
Holly Lourbert
Crown Law Office Criminal
10th Flr., 720 Bay Street
Toronto, Ontario
M5H 2K1
Telephone: (416) 326-2356
FAX: (416) 326-4656
Email: alex.hrybinsky@jus.gov.on.ca
Agent
441 MacLaren Street
Suite 200
Ottawa, Ontario
K2P 2H3
Telephone: (613) 236-9665
FAX: (613) 235-4430
Email: rhouston@burkerobertson.com
Summary
Keywords
None.
Summary
Case summaries are prepared by the Office of the Registrar of the Supreme Court of Canada (Law Branch). Please note that summaries are not provided to the Judges of the Court. They are placed on the Court file and website for information purposes only.
Charter of Rights — Freedom of Religion — Right to liberty — Criminal law — Evidence — Admissibility — Whether Court of Appeal erred in law by finding that statements made by applicant to a police officer posing as an Obeah spiritual leader should not be excluded due to violations of applicant’s ss. 2(a), 7 Charter rights or under the “dirty tricks” doctrine — Whether Court of Appeal erred in law by applying s. 686(1)(b)(iv) of the Criminal Code in order to dismiss the applicant’s appeal as a result of a violation of his right to be present for the entirety of his trial pursuant to section 650(1) of the Criminal Code, which occurred when the trial judge engaged in an in camera and ex parte discussion with Crown counsel without the accused or defence counsel being present and without their consent — Whether Court of Appeal erred in law by finding that the trial judge’s in camera and ex parte discussion with Crown counsel was for the purpose of resolving a claim of litigation privilege — Whether Court of Appeal violated the principles of procedural fairness by making the aforementioned finding about litigation privilege without that issue having been raised by any of the parties during the argument of the appeal and without having afforded an opportunity to the applicant to make submissions on that issue during the hearing of the appeal — Whether Court of Appeal erred in finding that the speculative Crown theory about the applicant “calling out shooters” did not provide the jury with “an independent path to finding Mr. Pinnock guilty of first degree murder”, and that therefore the trial judge was not obliged to provide a specific corrective instruction to the jury — Whether the questions of law raised are of sufficient public importance — ss. 2(a), 7 of the Charter.
After a trial by judge and jury, the applicant was convicted of first degree murder. An appeal from conviction was dismissed.
Lower court rulings
Ontario Superior Court of Justice
CRIMJ(P) 1123/06
See file
Court of Appeal for Ontario
C49887, 2013 ONCA 190
See file
Filed documents
The memorandums of argument on an application for leave to appeal will be posted here 30 days after leave to appeal has been granted unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of the memorandum by filling out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.
If you have questions about a memorandum of argument or want to use a memorandum of argument, please contact the author of the memorandum of argument directly. Their name appears at the end of the memorandum of argument. The contact information for counsel is found in the “Counsel” tab of this page.
Downloadable PDFs
Not available
Related links
The factums of the appellant, the respondent and the intervener will be posted here at least 2 weeks before the hearing unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of factums by filling out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.
If you have questions about a factum or want permission to use a factum, please contact the author of the factum directly. Their contact information appears on the first page of each factum.
Downloadable PDFs
Not available
Related links
The condensed books of the appellant, the respondent and the intervener will be posted here upon receipt of the electronic version, 2 days prior to the scheduled appeal hearing. You may also obtain copies of condensed books by filling out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.
If you have questions about a condensed book or want permission to use a condensed book, please contact the author of the condensed book directly. Their contact information appears on the first page of each condensed book.
Downloadable PDFs
Not available