Skip to main content

Case information

Conduct a refined search of the Supreme Court of Canada database to obtain details on the status of a matter before the Court.


35924

Jason Arbour v. Director of Public Prosecution, et al.

(Quebec) (Criminal) (By Leave)

Docket

Judgments on applications for leave to appeal are rendered by the Court, but are not necessarily unanimous.

List of proceedings
Date Proceeding Filed By
(if applicable)
2014-12-18 Close file on Leave
2014-12-12 Copy of formal judgment sent to Registrar of the Court of Appeal and all parties
2014-12-12 Judgment on leave sent to the parties
2014-12-11 Judgment of the Court on the application for leave to appeal, The application for leave to appeal from the judgment of the Court of Appeal of Quebec (Montréal), Number 500-10-005611-148, 2014 QCCA 774, dated April 4, 2014, is dismissed without costs.
Dismissed, without costs
2014-11-10 All materials on application for leave submitted to the Judges, CJ Cro Wa
2014-08-11 Applicant's reply to respondent's argument, (Book Form), Completed on: 2014-08-11, (Electronic version filed on 2014-08-12) Jason Arbour
2014-08-05 Respondent's response on the application for leave to appeal, (Letter Form), Completed on: 2014-08-05, (Electronic version filed on 2014-08-05) Director of Public Prosecution
2014-08-01 Certificate (on limitations to public access) Attorney General of Québec
2014-08-01 Book of authorities, (Electronic version filed on 2014-08-01) Attorney General of Québec
2014-08-01 Respondent's response on the application for leave to appeal, Completed on: 2014-08-01, (Electronic version filed on 2014-08-01) Attorney General of Québec
2014-06-03 Letter acknowledging receipt of a complete application for leave to appeal
2014-06-03 Certificate (on limitations to public access), (Included in the application for leave to appeal) Jason Arbour
2014-06-03 Application for leave to appeal, Completed on: 2014-06-03, (Electronic version filed on 2014-06-27) Jason Arbour

Parties

Please note that in the case of closed files, the “Status” column reflects the status of the parties at the time of the proceedings. For more information about the proceedings and about the dates when the file was open, please consult the docket of the case in question.

Main parties

Main parties - Appellants
Name Role Status
Arbour, Jason Applicant Active

v.

Main parties - Respondents
Name Role Status
Director of Public Prosecution Respondent Active
Attorney General of Québec Respondent Active

Counsel

Party: Arbour, Jason

Counsel
Names
Maxime Faille
Guy Régimbald
Paul Seaman
Contact information
Gowling WLG (Canada) LLP
2600-160 Elgin Street
P.O. Box 466, Station D
Ottawa, Ontario
K1P 1C3
Telephone: (613) 233-1781
FAX: (613) 563-9869
Email: maxime.faille@gowlingwlg.com

Party: Director of Public Prosecution

Counsel
Names
Isabelle Beaudoin-Desharnais
Jean Campeau
Contact information
Director of Public Prosecutions of Canada
17 Laurier Street
Office 1.230
Gatineau, Quebec
J8X 4C1
Telephone: (819) 776-8111 Ext: 60417
FAX: (819) 772-3986

Party: Attorney General of Québec

Counsel
Names
Florence Lavigne-LeBuis
Jean Campeau
Stéphanie Lisa Roberts
Contact information
Attorney General of Quebec
1 Notre-Dame Street East
Office 8.00
Montréal, Quebec
H2Y 1B6
Telephone: (514) 393-2336
FAX: (514) 873-7074
Agent
Name
Pierre Landry
Contact information
Noël et Associés, s.e.n.c.r.l.
111, rue Champlain
Gatineau, Quebec
J8X 3R1
Telephone: (819) 503-2178
FAX: (819) 771-5397
Email: p.landry@noelassocies.com

Summary

Keywords

None.

Summary

Case summaries are prepared by the Office of the Registrar of the Supreme Court of Canada (Law Branch). Please note that summaries are not provided to the Judges of the Court. They are placed on the Court file and website for information purposes only.



Aboriginal rights — Hunting — Non-status Indians — Applicant charged with hunting during a prohibited period — Applicant seeking stay of proceedings and invoking Aboriginal right to hunt — Motion for stay dismissed and applicant found guilty — Whether criteria set out in R. v. Powley, 2003 SCC 43, apply in whole or in part to assertion of Aboriginal rights by non-status Indians? — Whether descendants of an Aboriginal group that was disbanded and dispersed due to Crown conduct can revive ability to claim protections of s. 35 of Constitution Act, 1982? — Whether Crown can rely on effects of its historical conduct to disperse and assimilate an Aboriginal community in order to defeat an assertion of a s. 35 right? — Whether a person’s Aboriginal ancestry and assertion of an Aboriginal right constitute special and relevant considerations in determining whether state-funded counsel should be provided to defend against a regulatory offence?

In October 2008, the applicant was intercepted by a game warden while hunting in a wildlife sanctuary located roughly 100 kilometers north of Gatineau, Quebec. He was charged with hunting large game during a prohibited period, contrary to s. 56 of the Act Respecting the Conservation and Development of Wildlife, C.Q.L.R. c. C-61.1 (“the Act”) and the Regulation Respecting Hunting, C.Q.L.R. c. C-61.1, r. 12.

A non-status Indian, the applicant requested a stay of proceedings on the basis of his aboriginal heritage. Pursuant to s. 95 of the Code of Civil Procedure, C.Q.L.R. c. C-25, he also filed a Notice of Intention signaling his intent to seek a ruling that s. 56 of the Act is inapplicable to him by reason of his ancestral rights under s. 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982.

The applicant is a descendent of the Tsit-Kanaja Kaniengehaga, an Iroquoian people whose traditional territory was located in proximity to the Chaudière Falls which span the Ottawa River in the Ottawa/Gatineau area. The applicant identifies as a member of the Tsit-Kanaja Kaniengehaga, a historic community that was evicted and disbanded in the 1800s. That historic community, once disbanded, did not relocate as a group. As an adult, the applicant took steps to create his own contemporary community within the wildlife sanctuary, an area to which he felt a spiritual attachment.




Lower court rulings

February 20, 2013
Court of Quebec

550-61-019736-103

Applicant found guilty of having hunted large game during a prohibited period, contrary to s. 56 of the Act Respecting the Conservation and Development of Wildlife, C.Q.L.R. c. C-61.1 and the Regulation Respecting Hunting, C.Q.L.R. c. C-61.1, r. 12; Applicant fined $1 825

February 24, 2014
Superior Court of Quebec

2014 QCCS 666, 550-36-000012-128

Appeal dismissed

April 4, 2014
Court of Appeal of Quebec (Montréal)

2014 QCCA 774, 500-10-005611-148

Motion for leave to appeal, dismissed

Filed documents

The memorandums of argument on an application for leave to appeal will be posted here 30 days after leave to appeal has been granted unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of the memorandum by filling out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.

If you have questions about a memorandum of argument or want to use a memorandum of argument, please contact the author of the memorandum of argument directly. Their name appears at the end of the memorandum of argument. The contact information for counsel is found in the “Counsel” tab of this page.

Downloadable PDFs

Not available

The factums of the appellant, the respondent and the intervener will be posted here at least 2 weeks before the hearing unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of factums by filling out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.

If you have questions about a factum or want permission to use a factum, please contact the author of the factum directly. Their contact information appears on the first page of each factum.

Downloadable PDFs

Not available

The condensed books of the appellant, the respondent and the intervener will be posted here upon receipt of the electronic version, 2 days prior to the scheduled appeal hearing. You may also obtain copies of condensed books by filling out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.

If you have questions about a condensed book or want permission to use a condensed book, please contact the author of the condensed book directly. Their contact information appears on the first page of each condensed book.

Downloadable PDFs

Not available

Webcasts

Not available.

Date modified: 2025-02-27