Case information
Conduct a refined search of the Supreme Court of Canada database to obtain details on the status of a matter before the Court.
35951
Da Wei Chang v. Elizabeth Foo-Yun Chang Leung, Executrix of the Estate of Hsieu Chang, also Known as Chen Hsieu Chang, aslo known as Chang Chen Hsieu, Deceased, et al.
(British Columbia) (Civil) (By Leave)
Docket
Judgments on applications for leave to appeal are rendered by the Court, but are not necessarily unanimous.
| Date | Proceeding | Filed By (if applicable) |
|---|---|---|
| 2014-11-10 | Close file on Leave | |
| 2014-11-07 | Copy of formal judgment sent to Registrar of the Court of Appeal and all parties | |
| 2014-11-07 | Judgment on leave sent to the parties | |
| 2014-11-06 |
Judgment of the Court on the application for leave to appeal, The motion for an extension of time to serve and file the application for leave to appeal is granted. The application for leave to appeal from the judgment of the Court of Appeal for British Columbia (Vancouver), Number CA041020, 2014 BCCA 28, dated January 21, 2014, is dismissed without costs. Dismissed, without costs |
|
| 2014-11-06 |
Decision on motion to extend time to file and /or serve the leave application Granted |
|
| 2014-10-14 | All materials on application for leave submitted to the Judges, CJ Cro Wa | |
| 2014-10-14 | Submission of motion to extend time to file and/ or serve the leave application, CJ Cro Wa | |
| 2014-06-27 | Letter acknowledging receipt of a complete application for leave to appeal, File opened on 2014-06-27 | |
| 2014-06-23 | Motion to extend the time to file and or serve the application for leave to appeal, (Book Form), Completed on: 2014-06-23 | Da Wei Chang |
| 2014-04-03 | Correspondence (sent by the Court) to, Checklist | |
| 2014-03-25 | Correspondence (sent by the Court) to, Acknowledgment letter | |
| 2014-03-24 | Application for leave to appeal, Completed on: 2014-03-24 | Da Wei Chang |
Parties
Please note that in the case of closed files, the “Status” column reflects the status of the parties at the time of the proceedings. For more information about the proceedings and about the dates when the file was open, please consult the docket of the case in question.
Main parties
| Name | Role | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Chang, Da Wei | Applicant | Active |
v.
| Name | Role | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Elizabeth Foo-Yun Chang Leung, Executrix of the Estate of Hsieu Chang, also Known as Chen Hsieu Chang, aslo known as Chang Chen Hsieu, Deceased | Respondent | Active |
| Chang, Dai Hon | Respondent | Active |
| Chang, Dan Dai Sing | Respondent | Active |
Counsel
Party: Chang, Da Wei
This party is not represented by counsel.
Party: Elizabeth Foo-Yun Chang Leung, Executrix of the Estate of Hsieu Chang, also Known as Chen Hsieu Chang, aslo known as Chang Chen Hsieu, Deceased
This party is not represented by counsel.
Party: Chang, Dai Hon
This party is not represented by counsel.
Party: Chang, Dan Dai Sing
This party is not represented by counsel.
Summary
Keywords
None.
Summary
Case summaries are prepared by the Office of the Registrar of the Supreme Court of Canada (Law Branch). Please note that summaries are not provided to the Judges of the Court. They are placed on the Court file and website for information purposes only.
Canadian Charter — Wills and estates — Wills — Grant of probate — Whether the lower courts breached ss. 7, 12 or 15 of the Charter in their handling of this case — Whether the deceased’s tax records support the conclusions of the lower courts.
Hsieu Chang, who was predeceased by her husband in 2001, died on May 25, 2007. In her will, Ms. Chang bequeathed Mr. Chang with $10, the remainder to be divided between her other children, Ms. Leung, who acted as Ms. Chang’s executrix, and the other respondents. The will indicated that the minimal bequest to Mr. Chang reflected their poor relationship and the financial aid she had provided in the form of his interest in the Surrey property. In a codicil, Ms. Chang added that she had limited his inheritance due to his receipt of the proceeds from the sale of a property in Shanghai, and because she did not think he needed her financial support.
When Ms. Leung applied for probate of her mother’s estate, Mr. Chang opposed the application. In 2009, an order of probate was granted. When Mr. Chang appealed, the order was set aside and the matter was remitted for determination of issues of undue influence and testamentary capacity. The trial judge admitted the will into probate, dismissing claims of lack of capacity, undue influence, competence, and irrational provisions. Mr. Chang’s appeal was dismissed.
Lower court rulings
Supreme Court of British Columbia
S083532, 2013 BCSC 976
Last will and testament of Hsieu Chang dated July 10, 2000, and the codicil dated July 6, 2005, admitted into probate in solemn form of law; all caveats filed by Da Wei Chang cancelled; Da Wei Chang’s appeal of Master’s order dismissed; Da Wei Chang’s approval of order dispensed with.
Court of Appeal for British Columbia (Vancouver)
CA041020, 2014 BCCA 28
Appeal dismissed
Filed documents
The memorandums of argument on an application for leave to appeal will be posted here 30 days after leave to appeal has been granted unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of the memorandum by filling out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.
If you have questions about a memorandum of argument or want to use a memorandum of argument, please contact the author of the memorandum of argument directly. Their name appears at the end of the memorandum of argument. The contact information for counsel is found in the “Counsel” tab of this page.
Downloadable PDFs
Not available
Related links
The factums of the appellant, the respondent and the intervener will be posted here at least 2 weeks before the hearing unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of factums by filling out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.
If you have questions about a factum or want permission to use a factum, please contact the author of the factum directly. Their contact information appears on the first page of each factum.
Downloadable PDFs
Not available
Related links
The condensed books of the appellant, the respondent and the intervener will be posted here upon receipt of the electronic version, 2 days prior to the scheduled appeal hearing. You may also obtain copies of condensed books by filling out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.
If you have questions about a condensed book or want permission to use a condensed book, please contact the author of the condensed book directly. Their contact information appears on the first page of each condensed book.
Downloadable PDFs
Not available