Skip to main content

Case information

Conduct a refined search of the Supreme Court of Canada database to obtain details on the status of a matter before the Court.


37671

Frederick Radcliffe v. Her Majesty the Queen

(Ontario) (Criminal) (By Leave)

(Publication ban in case)

Docket

Judgments on applications for leave to appeal are rendered by the Court, but are not necessarily unanimous.

List of proceedings
Date Proceeding Filed By
(if applicable)
2017-12-08 Close file on Leave
2017-12-08 Copy of formal judgment sent to Registrar of the Court of Appeal and all parties
2017-12-08 Judgment on leave sent to the parties
2017-12-07 Judgment of the Court on the application for leave to appeal,
The motion for an extension of time to serve and file the application for leave to appeal is granted. The application for leave to appeal from the judgment of the Court of Appeal for Ontario, Number C52894, 2017 ONCA 176, dated March 2, 2017, is dismissed.
Dismissed
2017-12-07 Decision on motion to extend time to file and /or serve the leave application, See decision on application.
Granted
2017-11-06 All materials on application for leave submitted to the Judges, for consideration by the Court
2017-11-06 Submission of motion to extend time to file and/ or serve the leave application, for consideration by the Court
2017-08-29 Applicant's reply to respondent's argument, (Book Form), Completed on: 2017-08-29 Frederick Radcliffe
2017-08-21 Certificate (on limitations to public access), (Letter Form), 23B Her Majesty the Queen
2017-08-21 Certificate (on limitations to public access), (Letter Form), 23A Her Majesty the Queen
2017-08-21 Respondent's response on the application for leave to appeal, (Book Form), Completed on: 2017-08-21 Her Majesty the Queen
2017-08-01 Letter acknowledging receipt of a complete application for leave to appeal, FILE OPENED 2017/08/01
2017-07-31 Certificate (on limitations to public access), (Book Form), 23B Frederick Radcliffe
2017-07-31 Certificate (on limitations to public access), (Letter Form), 23A Frederick Radcliffe
2017-07-31 Motion to extend the time to file and or serve the application for leave to appeal, (Included in the application for leave to appeal), with consent, Completed on: 2017-07-31 Frederick Radcliffe
2017-07-31 Application for leave to appeal, (Book Form), (2 volumes), Completed on: 2017-07-31 Frederick Radcliffe

Parties

Please note that in the case of closed files, the “Status” column reflects the status of the parties at the time of the proceedings. For more information about the proceedings and about the dates when the file was open, please consult the docket of the case in question.

Main parties

Main parties - Appellants
Name Role Status
Radcliffe, Frederick Applicant Active

v.

Main parties - Respondents
Name Role Status
Her Majesty the Queen Respondent Active

Counsel

Party: Radcliffe, Frederick

Counsel
Brian Snell
5700 - 100 King Street West
Toronto, Ontario
M5X 1C7
Telephone: (416) 915-4206
Email: snell@briansnell.ca
Agent
Marie-France Major
Supreme Advocacy LLP
100- 340 Gilmour Street
Ottawa, Ontario
K2P 0R3
Telephone: (613) 695-8855 Ext: 102
FAX: (613) 695-8580
Email: mfmajor@supremeadvocacy.ca

Party: Her Majesty the Queen

Counsel
Christine Bartlett-Hughes
Attorney General of Ontario
Crown Law Office - Criminal
10th Floor - 720 Bay Street
Toronto, Ontario
M7A 2S9
Telephone: (416) 326-2351
FAX: (416) 326-4656
Email: christine.bartletthughes@ontario.ca
Agent
Robert E. Houston, Q.C.
Burke-Robertson
441 MacLaren Street
Suite 200
Ottawa, Ontario
K2P 2H3
Telephone: (613) 236-9665
FAX: (613) 235-4430
Email: rhouston@burkerobertson.com

Summary

Keywords

Criminal law – Sentencing – Dangerous offenders – Aboriginal heritage –Whether Gladue factors and s. 718(2)(e) of the Criminal Code are of such limited relevance in dangerous offender applications that a case involving an Aboriginal Canadian can be decided without reference to them – Whether sentencing judge was required to consider Gladue factors?

Summary

Case summaries are prepared by the Office of the Registrar of the Supreme Court of Canada (Law Branch). Please note that summaries are not provided to the Judges of the Court. They are placed on the Court file and website for information purposes only.

(PUBLICATION BAN IN CASE)

Mr. Radcliffe was convicted of sexual interference, sexual assault and failure to comply with a recognizance. Crown counsel applied for a dangerous offender designation. Mr. Radcliffe, a Cree, was adopted when he was four months old. At the dangerous offender hearing, his counsel led into evidence a letter from the Native Inmate Liaison Officer at Mr. Radcliffe’s detention centre. The officer states that Mr. Radcliffe had self-identified as Aboriginal and he had participated in Aboriginal programs. Defence counsel sought a long term offender designation. The sentencing judge declared Mr. Radclifffe a dangerous offender. He referred to the Native Inmate Liaison Officer’s letter but he did not refer to Gladue factors or R. v. Gladue, [1999] 1 S.C.R. 688, and no Gladue report was ordered.

Lower court rulings

June 25, 2009
Ontario Superior Court of Justice


Convictions: sexual touching of a person under fourteen years old, sexual assault, breach of recognizance

October 8, 2010
Ontario Superior Court of Justice

2010 ONSC 5829

Applicant declared a dangerous offender, indeterminate sentence imposed

March 2, 2017
Court of Appeal for Ontario

C52894, 2017 ONCA 176

Appeal from sentence (and convictions) dismissed

Memorandums of argument on application for leave to appeal

The memorandums of argument on an application for leave to appeal will be posted here 30 days after leave to appeal has been granted unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of the memorandum by filing out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.

If you have questions about a memorandum of argument or want to use a memorandum of argument, please contact the author of the memorandum of argument directly. Their name appears at the end of the memorandum of argument. The contact information for counsel is found in the “Counsel” tab of this page.

Downloadable PDFs

Not available

Factums on appeal

The factums of the appellant, the respondent and the intervener will be posted here at least 2 weeks before the hearing unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of factums by filling out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.

If you have questions about a factum or want permission to use a factum, please contact the author of the factum directly. Their contact information appears on the first page of each factum.

Downloadable PDFs

Not available

Webcasts

Not available.

Date modified: 2025-02-27