Case information
Conduct a refined search of the Supreme Court of Canada database to obtain details on the status of a matter before the Court.
38184
James Forcillo v. Her Majesty the Queen
(Ontario) (Criminal) (By Leave)
Docket
Judgments on applications for leave to appeal are rendered by the Court, but are not necessarily unanimous.
Date | Proceeding | Filed By (if applicable) |
---|---|---|
2018-12-20 | Close file on Leave | |
2018-12-07 | Copy of formal judgment sent to Registrar of the Court of Appeal and all parties | |
2018-12-07 | Judgment on leave sent to the parties | |
2018-12-06 |
Judgment of the Court on the application for leave to appeal, The application for leave to appeal from the judgment of the Court of Appeal for Ontario, Number C62370, 2018 ONCA 402, dated April 30, 2018, is dismissed. Dismissed |
|
2018-11-05 | All materials on application for leave submitted to the Judges, for consideration by the Court | |
2018-08-21 | Applicant's reply to respondent's argument, (Letter Form), Completed on: 2018-08-21 | James Forcillo |
2018-08-14 | Certificate (on limitations to public access), (Letter Form) | Her Majesty the Queen |
2018-08-14 | Respondent's response on the application for leave to appeal, (Book Form), (7 volumes), Completed on: 2018-08-14 | Her Majesty the Queen |
2018-06-28 | Letter acknowledging receipt of a complete application for leave to appeal, FILE OPENED 2018/06/28 | |
2018-06-27 | Certificate (on limitations to public access), (Letter Form) | James Forcillo |
2018-06-27 | Application for leave to appeal, (Book Form), Completed on: 2018-06-27 | James Forcillo |
Parties
Please note that in the case of closed files, the “Status” column reflects the status of the parties at the time of the proceedings. For more information about the proceedings and about the dates when the file was open, please consult the docket of the case in question.
Main parties
Name | Role | Status |
---|---|---|
Forcillo, James | Applicant | Active |
v.
Name | Role | Status |
---|---|---|
Her Majesty the Queen | Respondent | Active |
Counsel
Party: Forcillo, James
Counsel
Joseph Wilkinson
Bryan Badali
161 Bay St., Suite 2900
Toronto, Ontario
M5J 2S1
Telephone: (416) 362-4567
FAX: (416) 362-8410
Email: mlacy@btzlaw.ca
Agent
100- 340 Gilmour Street
Ottawa, Ontario
K2P 0R3
Telephone: (613) 695-8855 Ext: 102
FAX: (613) 695-8580
Email: mfmajor@supremeadvocacy.ca
Party: Her Majesty the Queen
Counsel
720 Bay Street
10th Floor
Toronto, Ontario
M7A 2S9
Telephone: (416) 326-2002
FAX: (416) 326-4656
Email: howard.leibovich@ontario.ca
Summary
Keywords
Charter of Rights and Freedoms — Cruel and unusual treatment or punishment — Fundamental justice — Criminal law — Sentencing — Elements of offence — Mandatory minimum sentence— Following fatal shooting, police officer acquitted of second degree murder and convicted of attempted murder — Whether Crown required to prove attempt murder was based on discrete transaction in order to support different verdict on charge of second-degree — Additional protections against mandatory minimum sentences provided by s. 7 of Charter, beyond s. 12 of Charter — Whether mandatory minimum sentence of 5 years’ for attempted murder with a restricted or prohibited firearm violates s. 12 of Charter — Whether R. v. Ferguson, 2008 SCC 6, should be reconsidered?
Summary
Case summaries are prepared by the Office of the Registrar of the Supreme Court of Canada (Law Branch). Please note that summaries are not provided to the Judges of the Court. They are placed on the Court file and website for information purposes only.
On July 27, 2013, on a crowded streetcar in Toronto, Sammy Yatim exposed himself, threatened a woman and chased everyone off the streetcar with a knife. Officer Forcillo and his partner were the first responding officers. They approached with firearms drawn and took up a position about 10 feet from the streetcar door. They yelled at Mr. Yatim to put down the knife but he refused. He retreated into the streetcar but then stepped forward. Officer Forcillo shot him three times. One bullet proved fatal but Mr. Yatim did not die immediately. Mr. Yatim fell backwards onto the floor of the streetcar. He picked up his knife. Officer Forcillo later testified that he perceived Mr. Yatim raise himself to a 45 degree angle but video surveillance footage is not consistent with this perception. 5.5 seconds after the first shots, Officer Forcillo fired 6 more shots, five of which hit Mr. Yatim. None accelerated his death. Officer Forcillo was charged with second degree murder based on the first three shots and attempted murder based on the subsequent six shots. The defence argued justified force and self-defence. A jury acquitted Officer Forcillo of second degree murder and convicted him of attempted murder. The sentencing judge dismissed an application to declare the mandatory minimum sentence required by ss. 239(1)(a) and 239(1)(a.1) of the Criminal Code to be in violation of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms and sentenced Officer Forcillo to six years imprisonment. The Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal from the conviction and sentence.
Lower court rulings
Ontario Superior Court of Justice
2016 ONSC 4850, CR-14-10000434-0000
Constitutional challenge to mandatory minimum sentence dismissed and Sentence to 6 years imprisonment
Ontario Superior Court of Justice
2016 ONSC 4896, CR-14-10000434-0000
See file
Court of Appeal for Ontario
C62370, 2018 ONCA 402
Appeal from conviction and sentence dismissed
Memorandums of argument on application for leave to appeal
The memorandums of argument on an application for leave to appeal will be posted here 30 days after leave to appeal has been granted unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of the memorandum by filing out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.
If you have questions about a memorandum of argument or want to use a memorandum of argument, please contact the author of the memorandum of argument directly. Their name appears at the end of the memorandum of argument. The contact information for counsel is found in the “Counsel” tab of this page.
Downloadable PDFs
Not available
Related links
Factums on appeal
The factums of the appellant, the respondent and the intervener will be posted here at least 2 weeks before the hearing unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of factums by filling out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.
If you have questions about a factum or want permission to use a factum, please contact the author of the factum directly. Their contact information appears on the first page of each factum.
Downloadable PDFs
Not available