Skip to main content

Case information

Conduct a refined search of the Supreme Court of Canada database to obtain details on the status of a matter before the Court.


38693

Helmut Oberlander v. Attorney General of Canada

(Federal) (Civil) (By Leave)

Docket

Judgments on applications for leave to appeal are rendered by the Court, but are not necessarily unanimous.

List of proceedings
Date Proceeding Filed By
(if applicable)
2020-01-13 Close file on Leave
2019-12-06 Copy of formal judgment sent to Registrar of the Court of Appeal and all parties
2019-12-06 Judgment on leave sent to the parties
2019-12-05 Judgment of the Court on the application for leave to appeal, The application for leave to appeal from the judgment of the Federal Court of Appeal, Number A-373-18, 2019 FCA 64, dated April 24, 2019, is dismissed with costs.
Dismissed, with costs
2019-10-28 All materials on application for leave submitted to the Judges, for consideration by the Court
2019-09-05 Applicant's reply to respondent's argument, (Book Form), Ask for amended covers, Completed on: 2019-09-05 Helmut Oberlander
2019-08-26 Certificate (on limitations to public access), (Letter Form) Attorney General of Canada
2019-08-26 Respondent's response on the application for leave to appeal, (Book Form), Completed on: 2019-09-06 Attorney General of Canada
2019-06-26 Letter acknowledging receipt of a complete application for leave to appeal, FILE OPENED 2019/06/26
2019-06-20 Certificate (on limitations to public access), (Letter Form), 23B Helmut Oberlander
2019-06-20 Certificate (on limitations to public access), (Letter Form), 23A Helmut Oberlander
2019-06-20 Application for leave to appeal, (Book Form), (2 volumes), Completed on: 2019-06-20 Helmut Oberlander

Parties

Please note that in the case of closed files, the “Status” column reflects the status of the parties at the time of the proceedings. For more information about the proceedings and about the dates when the file was open, please consult the docket of the case in question.

Main parties

Main parties - Appellants
Name Role Status
Oberlander, Helmut Applicant Active

v.

Main parties - Respondents
Name Role Status
Attorney General of Canada Respondent Active

Counsel

Party: Oberlander, Helmut

Counsel
Names
Ronald Poulton
Barbara Jackman
Contact information
596 St. Claire Ave W.
Toronto, Ontario
M6C 1A6
Telephone: (416) 653-9900 Ext: 232
FAX: (416) 653-1036
Email: ronald.poulton@sympatico.ca
Agent
Name
Eugene Meehan, Q.C.
Contact information
Supreme Advocacy LLP
100 - 340 Gilmour Street
Ottawa, Ontario
K2P 0R3
Telephone: (613) 695-8855 Ext: 101
FAX: (613) 695-8580
Email: emeehan@supremeadvocacy.ca

Party: Attorney General of Canada

Counsel
Names
Angela Marinos
Daniel Engel
Meva Motwani
Contact information
Attorney General of Canada
120 Adelaide Street West
Suite 400
Toronto, Ontario
M5H 1T1
Telephone: (647) 256-0763
FAX: (416) 954-8982
Email: angela.marinos@justice.gc.ca
Agent
Name
Christopher Rupar
Contact information
Department of Justice
50 O'Connor Street
Suite 500
Ottawa, Ontario
K1A 0H8
Telephone: (613) 670-6290
FAX: (613) 954-1920
Email: christopher.rupar@justice.gc.ca

Summary

Keywords

Immigration and citizenship — Appeals to Federal Court of Appeal — Certification of questions by the Federal Court — Citizenship revocation — Impartiality of the Governor in Council — Reasonable apprehension of bias — Complicity — Voluntary, knowing and significant contribution — Crimes against humanity — Citizenship Act, RSC 1985, c C-29, s 22.2 — What are the limits of the jurisdictional and other errors which can override s. 22.2(d) of the Citizenship Act requiring certified questions, and what should the process threshold test be in assessing those errors by the Court of Appeal? — Is the issue of the impartiality of the Governor in Council in citizenship revocation matters a separate, divisible, decision, such that s. 22.2(d) of the Citizenship Act does not apply? — Is the test of reasonable apprehension of bias limited to the perception of the conscious or unconscious predispositions of the judge on judicial review, or does it also include the perspective of the public viewing the matter, regardless of the judge’s predispositions?

Summary

Case summaries are prepared by the Office of the Registrar of the Supreme Court of Canada (Law Branch). Please note that summaries are not provided to the Judges of the Court. They are placed on the Court file and website for information purposes only.

This is the Governor in Council (GIC) fourth attempt to revoke Mr. Oberlander’s Canadian citizenship because he was found to have significantly misrepresented his wartime activities to Canadian immigration and citizenship officials when he applied to enter Canada. Mr. Oberlander was born in 1924, in Halbstadt, Ukraine, and became a German citizen during World War II. After the war, he applied with his wife to enter Canada in 1952, was admitted in 1954 as a permanent resident, and obtained Canadian citizenship in 1960. In 1995, RCMP officers commenced an investigation regarding his involvement in war crimes. Days later, the process of revoking his citizenship began. In 2000, the Federal Court first found that Mr. Oberlander had obtained his Canadian citizenship by false representation or by knowingly concealing material circumstances. On three occasions — in 2001, 2007 and 2012 —, the GIC’s attempted to revoke Mr. Oberlander’s citizenship. Each time, the decision was set aside by the Federal Court of Appeal and the matter was remitted back to the GIC for reconsideration. On June 20, 2017, the GIC issued Order in Council PC 2017-793 to revoke Mr. Oberlander’s citizenship for a fourth time on the grounds that he was complicit in crimes against humanity, having made a voluntary, knowing and significant contribution to the crimes committed by Ek10a. Mr. Oberlander applied to the Federal Court for judicial review of the GIC’s decision. On May 1, 2018, the Federal Court dismissed Mr. Oberlander’s motion for recusation with costs. On September 27, 2018, the Federal Court dismissed Mr. Oberlander’s application for judicial review of the Governor in Council’s decision to revoke his Canadian citizenship with costs. On November 7, 2018, the court lifted the stay of the judgment, confirmed that the application for judicial review was dismissed, and found that no question of serious general importance was to be certified. On April 24, 2019, the Federal Court of Appeal ordered that Mr. Oberlander’s notice of appeal from be removed from the court file and that the file be closed.

Lower court rulings

May 1, 2018
Federal Court

T-1590-17, 2018 FC 488

Motion for recusation dismissed with costs.

September 27, 2018
Federal Court

T-1590-17, 2018 FC 947

Application for judicial review of the Governor in Council’s decision to revoke Canadian citizenship dismissed with costs.

November 7, 2018
Federal Court

T-1590-17, 2018 FC 1121

Stay lifted; dismissal of the judicial review confirmed; no question of serious general importance certified.

April 24, 2019
Federal Court of Appeal

A-373-18, 2019 FCA 64

Notice of appeal removed from court file; file closed.

Filed documents

The memorandums of argument on an application for leave to appeal will be posted here 30 days after leave to appeal has been granted unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of the memorandum by filling out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.

If you have questions about a memorandum of argument or want to use a memorandum of argument, please contact the author of the memorandum of argument directly. Their name appears at the end of the memorandum of argument. The contact information for counsel is found in the “Counsel” tab of this page.

Downloadable PDFs

Not available

The factums of the appellant, the respondent and the intervener will be posted here at least 2 weeks before the hearing unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of factums by filling out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.

If you have questions about a factum or want permission to use a factum, please contact the author of the factum directly. Their contact information appears on the first page of each factum.

Downloadable PDFs

Not available

The condensed books of the appellant, the respondent and the intervener will be posted here upon receipt of the electronic version, 2 days prior to the scheduled appeal hearing. You may also obtain copies of condensed books by filling out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.

If you have questions about a condensed book or want permission to use a condensed book, please contact the author of the condensed book directly. Their contact information appears on the first page of each condensed book.

Downloadable PDFs

Not available

Webcasts

Not available.

Date modified: 2025-02-27