Skip to main content

Case information

Consult our database for details on a Supreme Court of Canada case.


39823

ViiV Healthcare Company, et al. v. Gilead Sciences Canada, Inc.

(Federal) (Civil) (By Leave)

Docket

Judgments on applications for leave to appeal are rendered by the Court, but are not necessarily unanimous.

List of proceedings
Date Proceeding Filed By
(if applicable)
2022-03-04 Close file on Leave
2022-02-07 Discontinuance of the application for leave to appeal, Consent of Discontinuance of the application included ViiV Healthcare Company
2022-01-24 All materials on application for leave submitted to the Judges, for consideration by the Court
2022-01-24 Submission of miscellaneous motion, for consideration by the Court
2021-11-15 Certificate (on limitations to public access), (Letter Form), 23B-Reply, (Printed version filed on 2021-11-15) ViiV Healthcare Company
2021-11-15 Applicant's reply to respondent's argument, (Book Form), Completed on: 2021-11-29, (Printed version filed on 2021-11-15) ViiV Healthcare Company
2021-11-03 Certificate (on limitations to public access), (Letter Form), (Included in the certificate (on limitations to public access)), 23B, (Printed version filed on 2021-11-26) Gilead Sciences Canada, Inc.
2021-11-03 Certificate (on limitations to public access), (Letter Form), 23A, (Printed version filed on 2021-11-26) Gilead Sciences Canada, Inc.
2021-11-03 Notice of name, (Letter Form), (Printed version filed on 2021-11-26) Gilead Sciences Canada, Inc.
2021-11-03 Respondent's response on the application for leave to appeal, (Book Form), Completed on: 2021-11-29, (Printed version filed on 2021-11-26) Gilead Sciences Canada, Inc.
2021-10-04 Letter acknowledging receipt of an incomplete application for leave to appeal, FILE OPENED 2021-10-04
2021-09-15 Notice of miscellaneous motion, (Book Form), (Included in the application for leave to appeal), Motion to Join, Completed on: 2021-10-04, (Printed version filed on 2021-09-21) ViiV Healthcare Company
2021-09-15 Book of authorities, (Book Form), Completed on: 2021-10-04, (Printed version filed on 2021-09-21) ViiV Healthcare Company
2021-09-15 Certificate (on limitations to public access), (Letter Form), 23A-B, (Printed version filed on 2021-09-21) ViiV Healthcare Company
2021-09-15 Notice of name, (Letter Form), (Printed version filed on 2021-09-21) ViiV Healthcare Company
2021-09-15 Application for leave to appeal, (Book Form), (2 volumes), Completed on: 2021-11-29, (Printed version filed on 2021-09-21) ViiV Healthcare Company

Parties

Please note that in the case of closed files, the “Status” column reflects the status of the parties at the time of the proceedings. For more information about the proceedings and about the dates when the file was open, please consult the docket of the case in question.

Main parties

Main parties - Appellants
Name Role Status
ViiV Healthcare Company Applicant Active
Shionogi & Co. Ltd. Applicant Active
ViiV Healthcare ULC Applicant Active

v.

Main parties - Respondents
Name Role Status
Gilead Sciences Canada, Inc. Respondent Active

Counsel

Party: ViiV Healthcare Company

Counsel
Names
Donald M. Cameron
R. Scott MacKendrick
Melanie Szweras
Michael Fenwick
Anastassia Trifonova
Contact information
Bereskin & Parr
40th Floor, Scotia Plaza
40 King Street West
Toronto, Ontario
M5H 3Y2
Telephone: (416) 364-7311
FAX: (416) 361-1398
Email: dcameron@bereskinparr.com
Agent
Name
Eugene Meehan, Q.C.
Contact information
Supreme Advocacy LLP
100 - 340 Gilmour Street
Ottawa, Ontario
K2P 0R3
Telephone: (613) 695-8855 Ext: 101
FAX: (613) 695-8580
Email: emeehan@supremeadvocacy.ca

Party: Shionogi & Co. Ltd.

Counsel
Names
Donald M. Cameron
R. Scott MacKendrick
Melanie Szweras
Michael Fenwick
Anastassia Trifonova
Contact information
Bereskin & Parr
40th Floor, Scotia Plaza
40 King Street West
Toronto, Ontario
M5H 3Y2
Telephone: (416) 364-7311
FAX: (416) 361-1398
Email: dcameron@bereskinparr.com
Agent
Name
Eugene Meehan, Q.C.
Contact information
Supreme Advocacy LLP
100 - 340 Gilmour Street
Ottawa, Ontario
K2P 0R3
Telephone: (613) 695-8855 Ext: 101
FAX: (613) 695-8580
Email: emeehan@supremeadvocacy.ca

Party: ViiV Healthcare ULC

Counsel
Names
Donald M. Cameron
R. Scott MacKendrick
Melanie Szweras
Michael Fenwick
Anastassia Trifonova
Contact information
Bereskin & Parr
40th Floor, Scotia Plaza
40 King Street West
Toronto, Ontario
M5H 3Y2
Telephone: (416) 364-7311
FAX: (416) 361-1398
Email: dcameron@bereskinparr.com
Agent
Name
Eugene Meehan, Q.C.
Contact information
Supreme Advocacy LLP
100 - 340 Gilmour Street
Ottawa, Ontario
K2P 0R3
Telephone: (613) 695-8855 Ext: 101
FAX: (613) 695-8580
Email: emeehan@supremeadvocacy.ca

Party: Gilead Sciences Canada, Inc.

Counsel
Names
Tim Gilbert
Nisha Anand
Kevin Siu
Colin Carruthers
Andrea Rico Wolf
Contact information
Gilbert's LLP
77 King Street West
Suite 2010, P.O. Box 301
Toronto, Ontario
M5K 1K2
Telephone: (416) 703-1100
FAX: (416) 703-7422
Email: tim@gilbertslaw.ca
Agent
Name
Christopher C. Rootham
Contact information
Nelligan O'Brien Payne LLP
50 O'Connor
Suite 300
Ottawa, Ontario
K1P 6L2
Telephone: (613) 231-8212
FAX: (613) 238-2098
Email: christopher.rootham@nelliganlaw.ca

Summary

Keywords

Intellectual property — Patents — Medicines — Judgments and orders — Summary judgments — Applicants’ patent found to be not infringed by respondent’s product in a summary trial — Does claim construction remain a question of law? — How should the Court reconcile correctness review and deference to underpinning factual findings in claim construction? — Was the Federal Court of Appeal bound, by vertical stare decisis, to follow the “construction is a question of law” approach in Whirlpool? — Was the Federal Court of Appeal bound, by horizontal stare decisis, to continue to follow the Whirlpool approach? — Does the principle of universality require that claim construction review be a correctness review? — Does primacy of the claim language mean the judge should not read into the claims the features of the more preferable embodiments? — Was the Federal Court bound, by vertical stare decisis, to follow the “twin criteria” evidence approach from Khelawon, and was it required to correct the Federal Court’s error of law?

Summary

Case summaries are prepared by the Office of the Registrar of the Supreme Court of Canada (Law Branch). Please note that summaries are not provided to the Judges of the Court. They are placed on the Court file and website for information purposes only.

The applicants (collectively “ViiV”) own the 282 Patent that covers several classes of chemical compounds used in the treatment of HIV. ViiV brought an action against Gilead Sciences Canada, Inc. (“Gilead”) alleging that Gilead’s compound, bictegravir, infringed its patent. Gilead counterclaimed on the basis that ViiV’s patent was invalid. Gilead brought a motion for summary trial on the issue of patent infringement. The main issue was whether, based on the patent construction, bictegravir fell within the scope of claims 1, 11 and 16 of the 282 Patent. The Federal Court granted Gilead’s motion for a summary trial and held that the 282 Patent was not infringed by Gilead’s product. ViiV’s action was dismissed. This decision was upheld on appeal.

Lower court rulings

January 24, 2020
Federal Court

2020 FC 127, T-226-18

Order regarding admissibility of certain evidence filed by parties in advance of summary trial

April 6, 2020
Federal Court

2020 FC 486, T-226-18

Respondent’s motion for summary trial granted; Order dismissing applicants’ action.

June 16, 2021
Federal Court of Appeal

2021 FCA 122, A-115-20, A-13-20, A-43-20, A-477-19

Applicants’ appeal dismissed

Filed documents

The memorandums of argument on an application for leave to appeal will be posted here 30 days after leave to appeal has been granted unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of the memorandum by filling out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613-996-8666 or at 1-844-365-9662.

If you have questions about a memorandum of argument or want to use a memorandum of argument, please contact the author of the memorandum of argument directly. Their name appears at the end of the memorandum of argument. The contact information for counsel is found in the “Counsel” tab of this page.

Downloadable PDFs

Not available

The factums of the appellant, the respondent and the intervener will be posted here at least 2 weeks before the hearing unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of factums by filling out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613-996-8666 or at 1-844-365-9662.

If you have questions about a factum or want permission to use a factum, please contact the author of the factum directly. Their contact information appears on the first page of each factum.

Downloadable PDFs

Not available

The condensed books of the appellant, the respondent and the intervener will be posted here upon receipt of the electronic version, 2 days prior to the scheduled appeal hearing. You may also obtain copies of condensed books by filling out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613-996-8666 or at 1-844-365-9662.

If you have questions about a condensed book or want permission to use a condensed book, please contact the author of the condensed book directly. Their contact information appears on the first page of each condensed book.

Downloadable PDFs

Not available

Webcasts

Not available.

Date modified: 2025-02-27