Case information
Conduct a refined search of the Supreme Court of Canada database to obtain details on the status of a matter before the Court.
39992
Anderson T. Walcott v. Toronto Transit Commission
(Ontario) (Civil) (By Leave)
Docket
Judgments on applications for leave to appeal are rendered by the Court, but are not necessarily unanimous.
| Date | Proceeding | Filed By (if applicable) |
|---|---|---|
| 2022-05-04 | Close file on Leave | |
| 2022-04-28 | Copy of formal judgment sent to Registrar of the Court of Appeal and all parties | |
| 2022-04-28 | Judgment on leave sent to the parties | |
| 2022-04-28 |
Judgment of the Court on the application for leave to appeal, The application for leave to appeal from the judgment of the Court of Appeal for Ontario, Number C68252, 2021 ONCA 358, dated May 28, 2021 is dismissed with costs. Dismissed, with costs |
|
| 2022-03-28 | All materials on application for leave submitted to the Judges, for consideration by the Court | |
| 2022-01-31 | Certificate (on limitations to public access), (Letter Form), (Printed version due on 2022-02-07) | Toronto Transit Commission |
| 2022-01-31 | Notice of name, (Letter Form), (Printed version due on 2022-02-07) | Toronto Transit Commission |
| 2022-01-31 | Respondent's response on the application for leave to appeal, (Book Form), Completed on: 2022-03-02, (Printed version filed on 2022-02-28) | Toronto Transit Commission |
| 2021-12-29 | Letter advising parties of an incomplete application for leave to appeal, FILE OPENED 2021-12-29 | |
| 2021-08-23 | Notice of name, (Letter Form), (Printed version due on 2021-08-30) | Anderson T. Walcott |
| 2021-08-11 |
Application for leave to appeal, (Book Form), require: -Amended notice of application, indicating the file number of the decision from which you seek leave to appeal (rec'd 2022-02-07) - Formal order form (rec'd 2022-02-07) -A copy of the final Court of Appeal Order, Completed on: 2022-03-24, (Electronic version filed on 2021-08-23) |
Anderson T. Walcott |
Parties
Please note that in the case of closed files, the “Status” column reflects the status of the parties at the time of the proceedings. For more information about the proceedings and about the dates when the file was open, please consult the docket of the case in question.
Main parties
| Name | Role | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Walcott, Anderson T. | Applicant | Active |
v.
| Name | Role | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Toronto Transit Commission | Respondent | Active |
Counsel
Party: Walcott, Anderson T.
This party is not represented by counsel.
Party: Toronto Transit Commission
Counsel
Legal Department
1900 Yonge Street
Toronto, Ontario
M4S 1Z2
Telephone: (416) 397-8495
FAX: (416) 338-0538
Email: justin.lim@ttc.ca
Summary
Keywords
Civil procedure — No genuine issue requiring a trial — Intellectual property — Copyright —Whether the lower courts misapprehended the evidence — Whether the lower courts erred in dismissing the applicant’s claim.
Summary
Case summaries are prepared by the Office of the Registrar of the Supreme Court of Canada (Law Branch). Please note that summaries are not provided to the Judges of the Court. They are placed on the Court file and website for information purposes only.
The applicant wrote the respondent (TTC) in 1994, offering to create a bus and subway route map guide. The TTC declined, stating that such a guide was already available to its passengers. In 1996, the appellant was concerned about the TTC route maps appearing in the Yellow Pages Directory. The TTC responded that those route maps had been internally generated, were not based on the applicant’s proposed guide, and had been available for years. After obtaining a Certificate of Registration for a guide from the United States Copyright Office, the applicant commenced an action, taking the position that by obtaining the Certificate he became the only legal source for publication of transit routes and schedules in Canada, the U.S., and worldwide. The applicant brought a motion for summary judgment seeking damages of $2,000,000 from the TTC. The TTC brought a cross-motion to dismiss the claim.
The Ontario Superior Court of Justice dismissed the applicant’s motion for summary judgment, granted the respondent’s cross-motion to dismiss the claim, and dismissed the claim. The motions judge found no evidence of any original expression in the applicant’s maps and no evidentiary basis to support the applicant’s claim of copyright. There was also no evidence that the TCC had used or adapted the applicant’s maps. Even if he had copyright in the guide, the scope of copyright would not preclude the TTC from publishing route maps or transit information, and there would have been no copyright infringement. The Court of Appeal for Ontario dismissed the appeal.
Lower court rulings
Ontario Superior Court of Justice
97-CU-119341
Applicant’s motion for summary judgment dismissed; respondent’s cross motion to dismiss the claim granted; claim against the respondent dismissed.
Court of Appeal for Ontario
2021 ONCA 358, C68252
Appeal dismissed.
Filed documents
The memorandums of argument on an application for leave to appeal will be posted here 30 days after leave to appeal has been granted unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of the memorandum by filling out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.
If you have questions about a memorandum of argument or want to use a memorandum of argument, please contact the author of the memorandum of argument directly. Their name appears at the end of the memorandum of argument. The contact information for counsel is found in the “Counsel” tab of this page.
Downloadable PDFs
Not available
Related links
The factums of the appellant, the respondent and the intervener will be posted here at least 2 weeks before the hearing unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of factums by filling out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.
If you have questions about a factum or want permission to use a factum, please contact the author of the factum directly. Their contact information appears on the first page of each factum.
Downloadable PDFs
Not available
Related links
The condensed books of the appellant, the respondent and the intervener will be posted here upon receipt of the electronic version, 2 days prior to the scheduled appeal hearing. You may also obtain copies of condensed books by filling out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.
If you have questions about a condensed book or want permission to use a condensed book, please contact the author of the condensed book directly. Their contact information appears on the first page of each condensed book.
Downloadable PDFs
Not available