Case information
Conduct a refined search of the Supreme Court of Canada database to obtain details on the status of a matter before the Court.
40474
Salim Rana v. Zahir Rana, Attorney for Gulzar Rana
(Alberta) (Civil) (By Leave)
Docket
Judgments on applications for leave to appeal are rendered by the Court, but are not necessarily unanimous.
| Date | Proceeding | Filed By (if applicable) |
|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-14 | Close file on Leave | |
| 2023-03-30 | Copy of formal judgment sent to Registrar of the Court of Appeal and all parties | |
| 2023-03-30 | Judgment on leave sent to the parties | |
| 2023-03-30 |
Judgment of the Court on the application for leave to appeal, The motion to file a lengthy memorandum is dismissed. The application for leave to appeal from the judgment of the Court of Appeal of Alberta (Calgary), Number 2201-0180AC, 2022 ABCA 270, dated August 16, 2022, is dismissed. Dismissed |
|
| 2023-03-30 |
Decision on motion to file a lengthy memorandum of argument, See decision on application Dismissed |
|
| 2023-03-16 | Correspondence (sent by the Court) to, Applicant - Motion submitted by the Applicant on March 7 was not accepted for filing pursuant to Rule 32(2) or the Rules of SCC. | |
| 2023-02-27 | All materials on application for leave submitted to the Judges, for consideration by the Court | |
| 2023-02-27 | Submission of motion to file a lengthy memorandum of argument, for consideration by the Court | |
| 2022-12-21 | Reply to the motion to file a lengthy memorandum of argument, (Letter Form), (Included in the applicant's reply to respondent's argument), Completed on: 2023-01-03 | Salim Rana |
| 2022-12-21 | Applicant's reply to respondent's argument, (Letter Form), Completed on: 2023-01-03, (Printed version due on 2022-12-30) | Salim Rana |
| 2022-12-16 | Response to the motion to file a lengthy memorandum of argument, (Included in the respondent's response on the application for leave to appeal), Completed on: 2023-01-03 | Zahir Rana, Attorney for Gulzar Rana |
| 2022-12-16 | Respondent's response on the application for leave to appeal, (Letter Form), Completed on: 2023-01-03, (Printed version due on 2022-12-23) | Zahir Rana, Attorney for Gulzar Rana |
| 2022-12-14 | Correspondence received from | Salim Rana |
| 2022-12-14 | Motion to file a lengthy memorandum of argument, (Book Form), Completed on: 2022-12-19 | Salim Rana |
| 2022-12-09 | Letter advising parties of an incomplete application for leave to appeal, FILE OPENED 2022-12-09 | |
| 2022-10-06 | Certificate (on limitations to public access), 23A | Salim Rana |
| 2022-10-06 |
Application for leave to appeal, (Book Form), REQUIRED: - CA Order (rec'd 2022-12-21) - TC Order - Motion to file lengthy memorandum (rec'd 2022-12-14), Completed on: 2023-03-01 |
Salim Rana |
Parties
Please note that in the case of closed files, the “Status” column reflects the status of the parties at the time of the proceedings. For more information about the proceedings and about the dates when the file was open, please consult the docket of the case in question.
Main parties
| Name | Role | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Rana, Salim | Applicant | Active |
v.
| Name | Role | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Zahir Rana, Attorney for Gulzar Rana | Respondent | Active |
Counsel
Party: Rana, Salim
This party is not represented by counsel.
Party: Zahir Rana, Attorney for Gulzar Rana
Counsel
Erin Baker
800, 304 – 8th Avenue S.W.
Calgary, Alberta
T2P 1C2
Telephone: (403) 571-1058
Email: wilsona@jssbarristers.ca
Summary
Keywords
Civil procedure — Appeals — Case management judge allowing applicant a visit with his mother on strict terms — Court refusing applicant’s application for permission to appeal case management judge’s order after applicant was declared a vexatious litigant — Does the applicant, and his descendants, have a fundamental right to visit his mother regularly and permanently? —Whether decision of the Court of Appeal should be set aside — Whether applicant should be permitted to continue the examinations of respondents and other individuals — Whether the respondent should be compelled to produce full version of June 5, 2021 video — Whether Court should allow applicant to get information of his mother’s health condition through independent assessment of an expert physician — Whether security for costs of $10,000 should be refunded to the applicant<br>
Summary
Case summaries are prepared by the Office of the Registrar of the Supreme Court of Canada (Law Branch). Please note that summaries are not provided to the Judges of the Court. They are placed on the Court file and website for information purposes only.
The applicant’s application under the Personal Directives Act, R.S.A. 2000, c. P-6 to have a visit with his mother under conditions imposed by the case management judge was granted. The applicant sought leave to appeal from the visitation order. The Court of Appeal refused the applicant’s application for permission to appeal.
Lower court rulings
Court of Queen’s Bench of Alberta
1501 02369
Applicant granted order to have a visit with his mother on specific conditions
Court of Appeal of Alberta (Calgary)
2022 ABCA 270, 2201-0180AC
Applicant’s application for permission to appeal order dismissed
Memorandums of argument on application for leave to appeal
The memorandums of argument on an application for leave to appeal will be posted here 30 days after leave to appeal has been granted unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of the memorandum by filing out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.
If you have questions about a memorandum of argument or want to use a memorandum of argument, please contact the author of the memorandum of argument directly. Their name appears at the end of the memorandum of argument. The contact information for counsel is found in the “Counsel” tab of this page.
Downloadable PDFs
Not available
Related links
Factums on appeal
The factums of the appellant, the respondent and the intervener will be posted here at least 2 weeks before the hearing unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of factums by filling out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.
If you have questions about a factum or want permission to use a factum, please contact the author of the factum directly. Their contact information appears on the first page of each factum.
Downloadable PDFs
Not available