Case information
Conduct a refined search of the Supreme Court of Canada database to obtain details on the status of a matter before the Court.
40486
Ingrid Hayden v. Bradley J. Hayden Professional Corporation, William Armstrong and Affiliates, Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP
(Alberta) (Civil) (By Leave)
Docket
Judgments on applications for leave to appeal are rendered by the Court, but are not necessarily unanimous.
| Date | Proceeding | Filed By (if applicable) |
|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-14 | Close file on Leave | |
| 2023-03-30 | Copy of formal judgment sent to Registrar of the Court of Appeal and all parties | |
| 2023-03-30 | Judgment on leave sent to the parties | |
| 2023-03-30 |
Judgment of the Court on the application for leave to appeal, The application for leave to appeal from the judgment of the Court of King’s Bench of Alberta, Number 1801 13923, 2022 ABKB 648, dated October 28, 2022, is dismissed with costs. Dismissed, with costs |
|
| 2023-02-20 | All materials on application for leave submitted to the Judges, for consideration by the Court | |
| 2023-02-03 | Correspondence received from | Ingrid Hayden |
| 2023-02-03 | Supplemental document, (Book Form), (Included in the applicant's reply to respondent's argument), (Printed version due on 2023-02-10) | Ingrid Hayden |
| 2023-02-03 | Applicant's reply to respondent's argument, (Book Form), Completed on: 2023-02-10, (Printed version filed on 2023-02-13) | Ingrid Hayden |
| 2023-01-24 | Notice of name, (Letter Form), (Printed version due on 2023-01-31) | Bradley J. Hayden Professional Corporation, William Armstrong and Affiliates, Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP |
| 2023-01-24 | Certificate (on limitations to public access), (Letter Form), 23A, (Printed version due on 2023-01-31) | Bradley J. Hayden Professional Corporation, William Armstrong and Affiliates, Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP |
| 2023-01-24 | Respondent's response on the application for leave to appeal, (Book Form), Completed on: 2023-01-25, (Printed version due on 2023-01-31) | Bradley J. Hayden Professional Corporation, William Armstrong and Affiliates, Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP |
| 2023-01-13 | Supplemental document, (Book Form), Response, (Printed version due on 2023-01-20) | Ingrid Hayden |
| 2023-01-13 | Supplemental document, (Book Form), Response authorities, (Printed version due on 2023-01-20) | Ingrid Hayden |
| 2022-12-14 | Letter advising parties of a complete application for leave to appeal, FILE OPENED 2022-12-14 | |
| 2022-11-24 | Book of authorities, (Book Form), Completed on: 2022-12-15, (Printed version filed on 2023-02-13) | Ingrid Hayden |
| 2022-11-24 |
Application for leave to appeal, (Book Form), Required: 23A (Clarifiy question 5) (Rec'd 2023-02-01), Completed on: 2023-02-21, (Printed version filed on 2022-12-06) |
Ingrid Hayden |
| 2022-11-24 | Supplemental document, (Book Form), (Printed version due on 2022-12-01) | Ingrid Hayden |
| 2022-11-24 | Certificate (on limitations to public access), (Letter Form), 23A, (Printed version due on 2022-12-01) | Ingrid Hayden |
Parties
Please note that in the case of closed files, the “Status” column reflects the status of the parties at the time of the proceedings. For more information about the proceedings and about the dates when the file was open, please consult the docket of the case in question.
Main parties
| Name | Role | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Hayden, Ingrid | Applicant | Active |
v.
| Name | Role | Status |
|---|---|---|
| William Armstrong and Affiliates, Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP, Bradley J. Hayden Professional Corporation, | Respondent | Active |
Counsel
Party: Hayden, Ingrid
This party is not represented by counsel.
Party: William Armstrong and Affiliates, Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP, Bradley J. Hayden Professional Corporation,
Counsel
Tyler Shandro
Fifth Avenue Place - West Tower
2120, 237 - 4th Avenue S.W.
Calgary, Alberta
T2P 4K3
Telephone: (403) 262-3000
FAX: (403) 237-0111
Email: dgilborn@caronpartners.com
Summary
Keywords
Civil procedure — Abuse of process — Did the Alberta Court of King’s Bench err in dismissing the application to set aside the vexatious litigant Order.
Summary
Case summaries are prepared by the Office of the Registrar of the Supreme Court of Canada (Law Branch). Please note that summaries are not provided to the Judges of the Court. They are placed on the Court file and website for information purposes only.
The applicant was made subject to prospective court access gatekeeping by the decision in Hayden v. Hayden, 2020 ABQB 700, and leave to appeal that decision was denied by a judge of the Court of Appeal of Alberta. After she unsuccessfully attempted to initiate further actions, Rooke A.C.J. prohibited her from filing documents except by leave of the court and subject to further conditions, including payment of an outstanding amount of $11,000 in penalties: 2022 ABQB 593. The applicant brought another application, writing to the Chief Justice of the Alberta Court of King’s Bench asking that the vexatious litigant Order be set aside because it had been obtained by misrepresentation and asking that all Orders by Rooke A.C.J. be vacated.
Associate Chief Justice Rooke dismissed the application on the grounds that the applicant had not followed the procedure set out in 2022 ABQB 593, had engaged in judge shopping, had engaged in a collateral attack of 2020 ABQB 700 and other decisions rendered in relation to her, and had provided no evidence that the court access restrictions imposed upon her by 2020 ABQB 700 and 2022 ABQB 593 should be reduced or eliminated. The applicant applies for leave to appeal that decision.
Lower court rulings
Court of Queen’s Bench of Alberta
1801 13923, 2022 ABKB 648
Application dismissed.
Filed documents
The memorandums of argument on an application for leave to appeal will be posted here 30 days after leave to appeal has been granted unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of the memorandum by filling out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.
If you have questions about a memorandum of argument or want to use a memorandum of argument, please contact the author of the memorandum of argument directly. Their name appears at the end of the memorandum of argument. The contact information for counsel is found in the “Counsel” tab of this page.
Downloadable PDFs
Not available
Related links
The factums of the appellant, the respondent and the intervener will be posted here at least 2 weeks before the hearing unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of factums by filling out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.
If you have questions about a factum or want permission to use a factum, please contact the author of the factum directly. Their contact information appears on the first page of each factum.
Downloadable PDFs
Not available
Related links
The condensed books of the appellant, the respondent and the intervener will be posted here upon receipt of the electronic version, 2 days prior to the scheduled appeal hearing. You may also obtain copies of condensed books by filling out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.
If you have questions about a condensed book or want permission to use a condensed book, please contact the author of the condensed book directly. Their contact information appears on the first page of each condensed book.
Downloadable PDFs
Not available