Skip to main content

Case information

Conduct a refined search of the Supreme Court of Canada database to obtain details on the status of a matter before the Court.


40835

Rene Hamouth v. His Majesty the King

(Ontario) (Criminal) (By Leave)

Docket

Judgments on applications for leave to appeal are rendered by the Court, but are not necessarily unanimous.

List of proceedings
Date Proceeding Filed By
(if applicable)
2024-01-11 Close file on Leave
2024-01-11 Copy of formal judgment sent to Registrar of the Court of Appeal and all parties
2024-01-11 Judgment on leave sent to the parties
2024-01-11 Judgment of the Court on the application for leave to appeal, The application for leave to appeal from the judgment of the Court of Appeal for Ontario, Number C70338, 2023 ONCA 518, dated August 2, 2023, is dismissed.
Dismissed
2023-11-27 All materials on application for leave submitted to the Judges, for consideration by the Court
2023-11-08 Certificate (on limitations to public access), (Letter Form), 23B, (Printed version filed on 2023-11-08) Rene Hamouth
2023-11-08 Applicant's reply to respondent's argument, (Book Form), Completed on: 2023-11-10, (Printed version filed on 2023-11-08) Rene Hamouth
2023-11-03 Certificate (on limitations to public access), (Letter Form), 23B

Missing - Proof of service


, (Printed version due on 2023-11-10)
His Majesty the King
2023-11-03 Certificate (on limitations to public access), (Letter Form), 23A

Missing - Proof of service, (Printed version due on 2023-11-10)
His Majesty the King
2023-11-01 Respondent's response on the application for leave to appeal, (Book Form), MIssing:

- 23A (Rec'd 2023-11-03), Completed on: 2023-11-14, (Printed version filed on 2023-11-03)
His Majesty the King
2023-10-03 Letter advising parties of a complete application for leave to appeal
2023-09-28 Certificate (on limitations to public access), (Letter Form), 23B, (Printed version filed on 2023-09-28) Rene Hamouth
2023-09-28 Certificate (on limitations to public access), (Letter Form), 23A, (Printed version filed on 2023-09-28) Rene Hamouth
2023-09-28 Application for leave to appeal, (Book Form), Completed on: 2023-10-03, (Printed version filed on 2023-09-28) Rene Hamouth
2023-08-15 Letter acknowledging receipt of a notice of application for leave to appeal
2023-08-15 Correspondence received, Letter from the applicant to the registry - Agent to be added to file
2023-08-09 Certificate (on limitations to public access), 23A, (Printed version due on 2023-08-16) Rene Hamouth
2023-08-09 Notice of application for leave to appeal, MISSING:
- Signed Trial Court Judgement and Order (Rec'd 2023-09-08)
- Filing fee (Payed 2023-08-15)
, Completed on: 2023-09-29, (Printed version due on 2023-08-16)
Rene Hamouth

Parties

Please note that in the case of closed files, the “Status” column reflects the status of the parties at the time of the proceedings. For more information about the proceedings and about the dates when the file was open, please consult the docket of the case in question.

Main parties

Main parties - Appellants
Name Role Status
Hamouth, Rene Applicant Active

v.

Main parties - Respondents
Name Role Status
His Majesty the King Respondent Active

Counsel

Party: Hamouth, Rene

Counsel
Alan D. Gold
Ellen C. Williams
Alan D. Gold Professional Corporation
20 Adelaide Street East
Suite 210
Toronto, Ontario
M5C 2T6
Telephone: (416) 368-1726
FAX: (416) 368-6811
Email: info@alandgoldlaw.com
Agent
Marie-France Major
Supreme Advocacy LLP
340 Gilmour Street
Suite 100
Ottawa, Ontario
K2P 0R3
Telephone: (613) 695-8855 Ext: 102
FAX: (613) 695-8580
Email: mfmajor@supremeadvocacy.ca

Party: His Majesty the King

Counsel
Jim Clark
Crown Law Office - Criminal
10-720 Bay St
Toronto, Ontario
M7A 2S9
Telephone: (437) 677-7274
Email: jim.clark2@ontario.ca

Summary

Keywords

Charter of Rights — Search warrant not set aside — Applicant’s s. 8 Charter application dismissed — Right to counsel — Remedy — Extent of s. 10(b) Charter breaches, and whether the evidence should be excluded — Admitting the firearms would not bring the administration of justice into disrepute pursuant to s. 24(2) of the Charter — Whether the lower courts erred in law — Whether the lower courts erred in their analysis of the causal connection between a Charter violation, the evidence and s. 24(2) of the Charter — Whether the lower courts erred in determining the possession of firearms issues — Whether Court of Appeal erred in the ss. 8 and 10 Charter analysis — Whether Court of Appeal erred in the s. 24(2) Charter analysis — Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, ss. 8, 10(b), 24(2).

Summary

Case summaries are prepared by the Office of the Registrar of the Supreme Court of Canada (Law Branch). Please note that summaries are not provided to the Judges of the Court. They are placed on the Court file and website for information purposes only.

The applicant was charged with multiple firearm related offences, all of which arose from the execution of a search warrant at a residential address. The applicant applied in a Garofoli hearing to set aside the search warrant and to have the 4 firearms seized from his residence excluded from the evidence. Feldman J. dismissed the applicant’s s. 8 Charter application. At trial, the Crown conceded that the applicant’s s. 10(b) Charter rights were infringed after the police located the firearms. After conducting a s. 24(2) Charter analysis, the trial judge found that in all the circumstances, admitting the firearms would not bring the administration of justice into disrepute. The Court of Appeal varied the conviction on one of the counts and dismissed the appeal.

Lower court rulings

August 19, 2020
Ontario Court of Justice

ONCJ 363

Applicant’s s. 8 Charter application dismissed

August 24, 2021
Ontario Court of Justice

ONCJ 444

Convictions entered: unauthorized possession of a firearm (x4); possession of a firearm knowing the possession is unauthorized (x4); and possession of a prohibited firearm with ammunition (x4)

August 2, 2023
Court of Appeal for Ontario

2023 ONCA 518, C70338

Conviction on count 12 is set aside and an acquittal is entered on that count; conditional stay on count 11 is set aside and a conviction is entered on that count; Appeal dismissed

Memorandums of argument on application for leave to appeal

The memorandums of argument on an application for leave to appeal will be posted here 30 days after leave to appeal has been granted unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of the memorandum by filing out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.

If you have questions about a memorandum of argument or want to use a memorandum of argument, please contact the author of the memorandum of argument directly. Their name appears at the end of the memorandum of argument. The contact information for counsel is found in the “Counsel” tab of this page.

Downloadable PDFs

Not available

Factums on appeal

The factums of the appellant, the respondent and the intervener will be posted here at least 2 weeks before the hearing unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of factums by filling out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.

If you have questions about a factum or want permission to use a factum, please contact the author of the factum directly. Their contact information appears on the first page of each factum.

Downloadable PDFs

Not available

Webcasts

Not available.

Date modified: 2025-02-27