Skip to main content

Case information

Conduct a refined search of the Supreme Court of Canada database to obtain details on the status of a matter before the Court.


41244

Teisha Leanne Focken v. Mark Jonathan Miller, et al.

(British Columbia) (Civil) (By Leave)

Docket

Judgments on applications for leave to appeal are rendered by the Court, but are not necessarily unanimous.

List of proceedings
Date Proceeding Filed By
(if applicable)
2024-09-27 Close file on Leave
2024-09-19 Copy of formal judgment sent to Registrar of the Court of Appeal and all parties
2024-09-19 Judgment on leave sent to the parties
2024-09-19 Judgment of the Court on the application for leave to appeal, The application for leave to appeal from the judgment of the Court of Appeal for British Columbia (Vancouver), Number CA48734, 2024 BCCA 74, dated March 1, 2024, is dismissed with costs.
Dismissed, with costs
2024-07-29 All materials on application for leave submitted to the Judges, for consideration by the Court
2024-06-04 Applicant's reply to respondent's argument, (Book Form), Completed on: 2024-06-04, (Printed version filed on 2024-06-04) Teisha Leanne Focken
2024-05-29 Certificate (on limitations to public access), (Letter Form), 23A, (Printed version filed on 2024-05-29) Mark Jonathan Miller
2024-05-29 Respondent's response on the application for leave to appeal, (Book Form), Completed on: 2024-05-29, (Printed version filed on 2024-05-30) Mark Jonathan Miller
2024-05-02 Letter acknowledging receipt of an incomplete application for leave to appeal, FILE OPENED 2024-05-02;
2024-04-26 Certificate (on limitations to public access), (Letter Form), 23A;, (Printed version filed on 2024-04-26) Teisha Leanne Focken
2024-04-26 Application for leave to appeal, (Book Form), Completed on: 2024-05-02, (Printed version filed on 2024-04-26) Teisha Leanne Focken

Parties

Please note that in the case of closed files, the “Status” column reflects the status of the parties at the time of the proceedings. For more information about the proceedings and about the dates when the file was open, please consult the docket of the case in question.

Main parties

Main parties - Appellants
Name Role Status
Focken, Teisha Leanne Applicant Active

v.

Main parties - Respondents
Name Role Status
Miller, Mark Jonathan Respondent Active
Best, Andrew Kurt Respondent Active

Counsel

Party: Focken, Teisha Leanne

Counsel
Name
Dairn Shane
Contact information
Preszler LLP
800 - 1075 West Georgia Street
Vancouver, British Columbia
V6E 3C9
Telephone: (778) 373-8202
FAX: (778) 373-4111
Email: dshane@preszlerlaw.com
Agent
Name
Marie-France Major
Contact information
Supreme Advocacy LLP
340 Gilmour Street
Suite 100
Ottawa, Ontario
K2P 0R3
Telephone: (613) 695-8855 Ext: 102
FAX: (613) 695-8580
Email: mfmajor@supremeadvocacy.ca

Party: Miller, Mark Jonathan

Counsel
Names
Joel Morris
Bruno Despart
Contact information
Harper Grey LLP
3200 - 650 West Georgia Street
Vancouver, British Columbia
V6B 4P7
Telephone: (604) 895-2887
Email: jmorris@harpergrey.com
Agent
Name
Jeffrey W. Beedell
Contact information
Gowling WLG (Canada) LLP
160 Elgin Street, Suite 2600
Ottawa, Ontario
K1P 1C3
Telephone: (613) 786-0171
FAX: (613) 563-9869
Email: jeff.beedell@gowlingwlg.com

Party: Best, Andrew Kurt

Counsel
Names
Joel Morris
Bruno Desparts
Contact information
Harper Grey LLP
3200 - 650 West Georgia Street
Vancouver, British Columbia
V6B 4P7
Telephone: (604) 895-2887
Email: jmorris@harpergrey.com
Agent
Name
Jeffrey W. Beedell
Contact information
Gowling WLG (Canada) LLP
160 Elgin Street, Suite 2600
Ottawa, Ontario
K1P 1C3
Telephone: (613) 786-0171
FAX: (613) 563-9869
Email: jeff.beedell@gowlingwlg.com

Summary

Keywords

Torts — Negligence — Standard of care — Foreseeable risk — Patient passed away while hospitalized — Widow asserting attending physicians breached standard of care owed to patient and their negligence caused his death — Lower courts dismissing medical negligence claim — Whether in determining if physicians have met requisite standard of care, does such review require courts to consider degree of foreseeable risk patient is under — Whether court in determining requisite standard of care, must consider whether standard of care employed by physicians is, in and of itself, fraught with obvious risks.

Summary

Case summaries are prepared by the Office of the Registrar of the Supreme Court of Canada (Law Branch). Please note that summaries are not provided to the Judges of the Court. They are placed on the Court file and website for information purposes only.

While hospitalized, a patient experienced bleeding in his throat that obstructed his airway leading to hypoxic cardiac arrest lasting appropriately nine minutes. He was intubated and placed on life support but suffered a significant hypoxic ischemic brain injury. He passed away in the intensive care unit. The applicant, his widow, asserted at trial that the attending physicians breached the standard of care they owed to the patient and their negligence caused his death. The trial judge dismissed the claim. The applicant appealed the dismissal of her action and the Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal.

Lower court rulings

December 6, 2022
Supreme Court of British Columbia

2022 BCSC 2124

Medical negligence claim dismissed.

March 1, 2024
Court of Appeal for British Columbia (Vancouver)

2024 BCCA 74

Appeal dismissed.

Filed documents

The memorandums of argument on an application for leave to appeal will be posted here 30 days after leave to appeal has been granted unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of the memorandum by filling out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.

If you have questions about a memorandum of argument or want to use a memorandum of argument, please contact the author of the memorandum of argument directly. Their name appears at the end of the memorandum of argument. The contact information for counsel is found in the “Counsel” tab of this page.

Downloadable PDFs

Not available

The factums of the appellant, the respondent and the intervener will be posted here at least 2 weeks before the hearing unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of factums by filling out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.

If you have questions about a factum or want permission to use a factum, please contact the author of the factum directly. Their contact information appears on the first page of each factum.

Downloadable PDFs

Not available

The condensed books of the appellant, the respondent and the intervener will be posted here upon receipt of the electronic version, 2 days prior to the scheduled appeal hearing. You may also obtain copies of condensed books by filling out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.

If you have questions about a condensed book or want permission to use a condensed book, please contact the author of the condensed book directly. Their contact information appears on the first page of each condensed book.

Downloadable PDFs

Not available

Webcasts

Not available.

Date modified: 2025-07-09