Case information
Conduct a refined search of the Supreme Court of Canada database to obtain details on the status of a matter before the Court.
41702
David Romlewski v. His Majesty the King
(Ontario) (Criminal) (By Leave)
Docket
Judgments on applications for leave to appeal are rendered by the Court, but are not necessarily unanimous.
| Date | Proceeding | Filed By (if applicable) |
|---|---|---|
| 2025-07-25 | Close file on Leave | |
| 2025-07-24 | Copy of formal judgment sent to Registrar of the Court of Appeal and all parties | |
| 2025-07-24 | Judgment on leave sent to the parties | |
| 2025-07-24 |
Judgment of the Court on the application for leave to appeal, The motion to continue the application for leave to appeal is dismissed. The application for leave to appeal from the judgment of the Court of Appeal for Ontario, Number COA-23-OM-0323, dated January 10, 2025, is quashed. Quashed |
|
| 2025-07-24 |
Decision on the miscellaneous motion, See judgment on application Dismissed |
|
| 2025-06-23 | All materials on application for leave submitted to the Judges, for consideration by the Court | |
| 2025-06-23 | Submission of miscellaneous motion, for consideration by the Court | |
| 2025-05-22 |
Affidavit, (Letter Form), Missing Proof of Service (Rec'd 2025-05-26), (Printed version due on 2025-05-29) |
David Romlewski |
| 2025-05-02 |
Response to miscellaneous motion, (Letter Form), Missing Proof of Service , Completed on: 2025-06-24, (Printed version filed on 2025-05-16) |
His Majesty the King |
| 2025-04-22 |
Notice of miscellaneous motion, (Letter Form), Missing Proof of Service (Rec'd 2025-04-24), Completed on: 2025-04-24, (Printed version filed on 2025-04-22) |
David Romlewski |
| 2025-04-22 |
Applicant's reply to respondent's argument, (Letter Form), Missing Proof of Service (Rec'd 2025-04-24), Completed on: 2025-04-24, (Printed version filed on 2025-04-22) |
David Romlewski |
| 2025-04-11 | Certificate (on limitations to public access), (Letter Form), 23A, (Printed version filed on 2025-04-15) | His Majesty the King |
| 2025-04-11 |
Respondent's response on the application for leave to appeal, (Letter Form), Missing Amended 23A Proof of Service , Completed on: 2025-06-24, (Printed version filed on 2025-04-15) |
His Majesty the King |
| 2025-03-12 | Letter acknowledging receipt of an incomplete application for leave to appeal, FILE OPENED 03/12/2025 | |
| 2025-03-11 | Certificate (on limitations to public access), (Letter Form), 23A, (Printed version filed on 2025-03-11) | David Romlewski |
| 2025-03-11 |
Application for leave to appeal, (Book Form), Missing Proof of Service (on the initial application)(Rec'd 2025-03-19) Amended Notice of Application (Rec'd 2025-03-13) , Completed on: 2025-03-19, (Printed version filed on 2025-03-11) |
David Romlewski |
Parties
Please note that in the case of closed files, the “Status” column reflects the status of the parties at the time of the proceedings. For more information about the proceedings and about the dates when the file was open, please consult the docket of the case in question.
Main parties
| Name | Role | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Romlewski, David | Applicant | Active |
v.
| Name | Role | Status |
|---|---|---|
| His Majesty the King | Respondent | Active |
Counsel
Party: Romlewski, David
Counsel
Ottawa, Ontario
K1N 6H2
Telephone: (519) 872-1905
Email: doodycounsel@gmail.com
Party: His Majesty the King
Counsel
720 Bay Street, 10th Floor
Toronto, Ontario
Telephone: (437) 855-3324
Email: akshay.aurora@ontario.ca
Summary
Keywords
Charter of Rights and Freedoms — Liberty — Freedom of expression — Right to be informed of nature of offence — Right to be presumed innocent — Right to trial by jury — Right not to be tried again if acquitted — Criminal law — Mischief — Appellate review — Common law ancillary powers of police — Defences — Whether summary conviction appeal court applied incorrect standard of review — Whether accused improperly denied right to elect his mode of trial — Whether Crown’s summary election breached Charter — Whether failure to consider the withdrawal of a count was an error of law — Whether police officers’ conduct fell within statutory or common law duties or orders — Whether application of ancillary powers doctrine breached Charter — Whether mischief counts constituted separate transactions — Whether the summary convictions judge erred by relying on case law or in concluding trial judge made a finding of fact that there was a public mischief or by ignoring lack of evidence of interference by accused with any access to or from any residence or business or by dismissing colour of right defences?
Summary
Case summaries are prepared by the Office of the Registrar of the Supreme Court of Canada (Law Branch). Please note that summaries are not provided to the Judges of the Court. They are placed on the Court file and website for information purposes only.
During protests in Ottawa against COVID-19 measures, Mr. Romlewski was approached by tactical police officers seeking to clear the area. When ordered to move out of the way, he sat down on the street and obstructed the tactical police. At trial he was convicted of obstructing a peace officer and acquitted on two counts of mischief. A summary conviction appeal court allowed an appeal from the acquittals and entered convictions on both counts of mischief. The Court of Appeal denied leave to appeal.
Lower court rulings
Acquittals on two counts of mischief, conviction for obstructing a peace officer
Appeal from acquittals allowed and convictions entered on two counts of mischief
Court of Appeal for Ontario
COA-23-OM-0323
Application for leave to appeal dismissed
Filed documents
The memorandums of argument on an application for leave to appeal will be posted here 30 days after leave to appeal has been granted unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of the memorandum by filling out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.
If you have questions about a memorandum of argument or want to use a memorandum of argument, please contact the author of the memorandum of argument directly. Their name appears at the end of the memorandum of argument. The contact information for counsel is found in the “Counsel” tab of this page.
Downloadable PDFs
Not available
Related links
The factums of the appellant, the respondent and the intervener will be posted here at least 2 weeks before the hearing unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of factums by filling out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.
If you have questions about a factum or want permission to use a factum, please contact the author of the factum directly. Their contact information appears on the first page of each factum.
Downloadable PDFs
Not available
Related links
The condensed books of the appellant, the respondent and the intervener will be posted here upon receipt of the electronic version, 2 days prior to the scheduled appeal hearing. You may also obtain copies of condensed books by filling out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.
If you have questions about a condensed book or want permission to use a condensed book, please contact the author of the condensed book directly. Their contact information appears on the first page of each condensed book.
Downloadable PDFs
Not available