Case information
Conduct a refined search of the Supreme Court of Canada database to obtain details on the status of a matter before the Court.
41759
Kathirgamanathan Suppiah v. His Majesty the King
(Ontario) (Criminal) (By Leave)
Docket
Judgments on applications for leave to appeal are rendered by the Court, but are not necessarily unanimous.
| Date | Proceeding | Filed By (if applicable) |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-01-21 | Close file on Leave | |
| 2026-01-19 | Reconsideration not accepted for filing | |
| 2025-08-25 | Letter acknowledging receipt of an incomplete motion for reconsideration | |
| 2025-07-30 | Motion for reconsideration of the application for leave to appeal, (Book Form), Missing: Proof of service, Incomplete | Kathirgamanathan Suppiah |
| 2025-07-10 | Copy of formal judgment sent to Registrar of the Court of Appeal and all parties | |
| 2025-07-10 | Judgment on leave sent to the parties | |
| 2025-07-10 |
Decision on motion to extend time to file and /or serve the leave application, The motion for an extension of time to serve and file the application for leave to appeal from the judgment of the Court of Appeal for Ontario, Number COA-23-OM-0153, dated August 30, 2023, is dismissed. Dismissed |
|
| 2025-06-09 | All materials on application for leave submitted to the Judges, for consideration by the Court | |
| 2025-06-09 | Submission of motion to extend time to file and/ or serve the leave application, for consideration by the Court | |
| 2025-05-09 | Certificate (on limitations to public access), (Letter Form), 23A, (Printed version filed on 2025-05-12) | His Majesty the King |
| 2025-05-09 | Respondent's response on the application for leave to appeal, (Letter Form), Completed on: 2025-05-12, (Printed version filed on 2025-05-12) | His Majesty the King |
| 2025-05-02 |
Applicant's reply to respondent's argument, (Letter Form), Missing: -Proof of service, Completed on: 2025-06-06, (Printed version due on 2025-05-09) |
Kathirgamanathan Suppiah |
| 2025-04-28 | Certificate (on limitations to public access), (Letter Form), (Included in the supplemental document), Public access to information | Kathirgamanathan Suppiah |
| 2025-04-28 | Supplemental document, (Book Form), Amended notice of application for leave to appeal, (Printed version due on 2025-05-05) | Kathirgamanathan Suppiah |
| 2025-04-17 | Lower court order - e-filing, (Book Form), Order of the Ontario Court of Appeal and order of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice | Kathirgamanathan Suppiah |
| 2025-04-15 | Letter advising parties of an incomplete application for leave to appeal, File open | |
| 2025-03-13 |
Motion to extend the time to file and or serve the application for leave to appeal, (Letter Form), MISSING: -Proof of service (Rec'd 2025-04-28), Completed on: 2025-05-01 |
Kathirgamanathan Suppiah |
| 2025-03-13 |
Application for leave to appeal, (Book Form), MISSING: -Amended notice (Rec'd 2025-04-28) -CA order (Rec'd 2025-04-17) -Trial court order (Rec'd 2025-04-17) -Public access to Information Form (Rec'd 2025-04-28) -Proof of service (Rec'd 2025-04-28), Completed on: 2025-05-01 |
Kathirgamanathan Suppiah |
Parties
Please note that in the case of closed files, the “Status” column reflects the status of the parties at the time of the proceedings. For more information about the proceedings and about the dates when the file was open, please consult the docket of the case in question.
Main parties
| Name | Role | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Suppiah, Kathirgamanathan | Applicant | Active |
v.
| Name | Role | Status |
|---|---|---|
| His Majesty the King | Respondent | Active |
Counsel
Party: Suppiah, Kathirgamanathan
This party is not represented by counsel.
Party: His Majesty the King
Counsel
720 Bay Street, 10th Floor
Toronto, Ontario
M7A 2S9
Telephone: (437) 833-8967
Email: nicholas.hay@ontario.ca
Summary
Keywords
Criminal law — Evidence — Exclusion of evidence — Proof of causation — Access to justice and systemic barriers for self-represented litigants — Whether medical report detailing deceased’s pre-existing medical conditions wrongly excluded — Whether exclusion of medical report violated principles of procedural fairness — Whether exclusion of medical report materially affected causation findings at trial undermining confidence in verdict — Whether trial judge and court of appeal deprived accused of fair trial and undermined integrity of judicial process by wrongly applying s. 52 of Evidence Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. E.23?
Summary
Case summaries are prepared by the Office of the Registrar of the Supreme Court of Canada (Law Branch). Please note that summaries are not provided to the Judges of the Court. They are placed on the Court file and website for information purposes only.
Mr. Suppiah was found sitting in a bedroom with the body of his deceased wife nearby. He appeared to be intoxicated. A post-mortem report indicated that his wife had suffered trauma to her neck and chest, several broken ribs, and a lacerated liver which caused internal bleeding. The trial judge held that there had been no dispute that Mr. Suppiah’s wife bled to death from the laceration to her liver and the laceration was the result of blunt force trauma to her chest and abdomen. Mr. Suppiah was convicted of manslaughter. The Court of Appeal dismissed an application for an extension of time to appeal.
Lower court rulings
Conviction for manslaughter
Court of Appeal for Ontario
COA-23-OM-0153
Extension of time to appeal denied
Filed documents
The memorandums of argument on an application for leave to appeal will be posted here 30 days after leave to appeal has been granted unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of the memorandum by filling out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.
If you have questions about a memorandum of argument or want to use a memorandum of argument, please contact the author of the memorandum of argument directly. Their name appears at the end of the memorandum of argument. The contact information for counsel is found in the “Counsel” tab of this page.
Downloadable PDFs
Not available
Related links
The factums of the appellant, the respondent and the intervener will be posted here at least 2 weeks before the hearing unless they contain personal information, information that is subject to a publication ban, or any other information that is not part of the public record. You may also obtain copies of factums by filling out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.
If you have questions about a factum or want permission to use a factum, please contact the author of the factum directly. Their contact information appears on the first page of each factum.
Downloadable PDFs
Not available
Related links
The condensed books of the appellant, the respondent and the intervener will be posted here upon receipt of the electronic version, 2 days prior to the scheduled appeal hearing. You may also obtain copies of condensed books by filling out the Request for Court records form or by contacting the Court’s Records Centre either by email at records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca or by telephone at 613‑996‑7933 or at 1‑888‑551‑1185.
If you have questions about a condensed book or want permission to use a condensed book, please contact the author of the condensed book directly. Their contact information appears on the first page of each condensed book.
Downloadable PDFs
Not available