Case information

Torts — Vicarious liability — Intentional torts — Sexual assault of children — Volunteer tutor provided to child by school — Tutor began grooming child during in-school tutoring sessions — Tutor insinuated himself into child’s life and continued grooming child when in-school tutoring ending — Child sexually assaulted by tutor — Whether pattern of behaviour justified imposition of vicarious liability on school — Analytical framework for institutional liability where institution’s relationship with wrongdoer provides opportunity for wrongdoer to engage in grooming of young victims — Application of horizontal stare decisis.

Case summaries are prepared by the Office of the Registrar of the Supreme Court of Canada (Law Branch). Please note that summaries are not provided to the Judges of the Court. They are placed on the Court file and website for information purposes only.

(PUBLICATION BAN IN CASE)

The critical facts were undisputed. When H.N. was in grade six, he required greater challenge in English, so tutoring sessions were proposed as enrichment. H.N.’s teacher suggested a qualified, recently retired teacher, Mr. Redgate, as a tutor. Mr. Redgate, having met with H.N. and his mother, agreed to volunteer as his tutor. They had weekly 40-minute tutoring sessions held in an empty classroom during class time. The school secretary directed them to the classroom and knew where they were. They could be observed, and the teacher checked on them from time-to-time. Mr. Redgate made incremental physical advances to H.N. — sitting next to H.N., moving so their arms touched occasionally; he hugged him at school once. He then began to insinuate himself into H.N.’s life outside of school. H.N. visited Mr. Redgate’s home twice during the grade six year. The grade six teacher knew of those visits, but did not inform the school principal or suggest that Mr. Redgate do so. H.N. made approximately 50 visits to Mr. Redgate’s home over the next five years. Mr. Redgate became increasingly affectionate and intensified his emotional manipulation and the relationship became more emotional and sexual. Mr. Redgate died before trial, but the matter continued against his estate and the Board of Education of School District No. 61 (Greater Victoria) (“District”).

The trial judge found Mr. Redgate’s estate liable for the sexual assaults and awarded H.N. more than $2.3 million. He dismissed claims of direct negligence against the District. As to whether the District was vicariously liable, the trial judge found that Jacobi v. Griffiths, [1999] 2 S.C.R. 570, was the governing precedent. Applying it, he found that vicarious liability had not been made out against District. The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal.