Skip to main content

The Office of the Registrar of the Supreme Court of Canada 2025-2026 departmental plan


PDF Version

The original version was signed by

The Honourable Sean Fraser, P.C., M.P.
Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada and Minister responsible for the Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency


From the Registrar

Picture of Chantal Carbonneau, Registrar
Chantal Carbonneau
Registrar

I am pleased to present the 2025–26 Departmental Plan for the Office of the Registrar of the Supreme Court of Canada (ORSCC).

The information presented in this report highlights our main areas of focus, the results we aim to achieve as well as providing transparency on how financial resources will be spent. We also describe in our report our programs and services for Canadians, our priorities for 2025–26, and how our work will help us attain our organizational priorities.

The judges of the Supreme Court of Canada (Court) are supported by the ORSCC, being an integral component of the Court. As defined by its Core Responsibility statement, i.e. “The Administration of Canada’s final court of appeal”, the ORSCC provides services and support for Canada’s final court of appeal to process, hear and decide cases as well as playing a central role in communications and outreach. The environment and context in which the Court manages and decides cases is continuously evolving, which presents us with new challenges, but also new opportunities.

In 2025–26, the ORSCC will continue to place a high priority on pursuing its work towards the adaptation of its business processes to an electronic environment. By building on the success of its new electronic filing portal, the ORSCC will continuously improve electronic access to the Court’s case files and information, leveraging new technologies to streamline case administration, both for internal use by the Court as well as by the public, including counsel and self-represented litigants, and therefore enhancing access to justice and judicial information for all Canadians. The ORSCC has undertaken a review of its website to modernize and enhance the information provided. Our new website is just one such measure, which will improve the discoverability of information and enhance access to case files. Access to justice and court modernization go hand-in-hand and these initiatives support the Court’s commitment to key judicial principles of openness and transparency.

We will also continue our initiatives to enhance the Court’s overall security services which is aimed to balance the safety of all participants in the judicial process, as well as the basic principles of fairness, access and openness which underpin the administration of justice. Additionally, in order to meet the pressures relating to the aging Court building and operational facilities, significant time and resources have been (and will continue to be) dedicated to planning for the rehabilitation initiative of the Supreme Court of Canada Building. I am confident that this preparation will result in a smooth transition for all Court users.

Finally, raising public and stakeholders’ awareness of the Court and increasing access to justice and to judicial information for the public continues to be a priority for the ORSCC. As such, efforts will continue to be dedicated to ensure effective communications and outreach activities in support of the Court’s evolving role and the increased public interest in the Court’s work.

As we commemorate the 150th anniversary of the Supreme Court of Canada in 2025, it has become increasingly evident that the role the Court has played over the last century and a half has been central in the development of Canada’s law and judicial excellence. We are therefore very committed and proud to be able to support the myriad communications and outreach activities planned throughout this anniversary year and support the Court in continuing its legacy and fostering access to justice and judicial independence.

I would like to conclude by thanking the entire staff of the Court for their continuing hard work and enthusiasm in serving the Court and Canadians with unfailing professionalism and a dedicated sense of purpose. They play an essential role in realizing our plans and priorities. We will continue to support them and foster a safe, inclusive, and diverse workplace, while supporting the professional growth of every employee.

As we move forward in 2025–26, I am looking forward to continue collaborating with the Chief Justice, members of the Court and our employees to advance our priorities in the year ahead.


Chantal Carbonneau, Registrar

Plans to deliver on core responsibility and internal services

Description

Provide services and support for Canada’s final court of appeal to process, hear and decide cases. Support communications and outreach to stakeholders.

Quality of life impacts

This core responsibility contributes to the ‘Good Governance’ domain of the Quality of Life Framework for Canada and, more specifically, ‘Confidence in institutions’, through all of the activities mentioned in the core responsibility description.

Indicators, results and targets

This section presents details on the department’s indicators, the actual results from the three most recently reported fiscal years, the targets and target dates approved in 2025–26 for the administration of Canada’s final court of appeal. Details are presented by departmental result.

Table [1]: Judges and parties are supported through effective court services and case management

Table [1] provides a summary of the target and actual results for each indicator associated with the results under Judges and parties are supported through effective court services and case management.

Table [1]: Judges and parties are supported through effective court services and case management
Indicator Actual results Target Date to achieve target
Average number of weeks between the filing of an application for leave to appeal and the date when it is submitted to the Court for decision

2021-22: 7 weeks
2022-23: 14 weeks
2023-24: 13 weeks

12 weeks

March 31, 2026

Frequency: Annually

Average number of weeks between date when leave to appeal is granted and the hearing of the appeal

2021–22: 37 weeks
2022–23: 36 weeks
2023–24: 45 weeks Footnote 1

35 weeks

March 31, 2026

Frequency: Annually

Percent of parties that were “satisfied” or “very satisfied” with the services of the Registry Branch of the Office of the Registrar

2021–22: 94%
2022–23: 96%
2023–24: 98%

95%

March 31, 2026

Frequency: Annually

Table [2]: Public and stakeholders’ awareness of the Court is increased through effective communication and outreach

Table [2] provides a summary of the target and actual results for each indicator associated with the results under Public and stakeholders’ awareness of the Court is increased through effective communication and outreach.

Table [2]: Public and stakeholders’ awareness of the Court is increased through effective communication and outreach
Indicator Actual results Target Date to achieve
Annual percentage increase in number of unique visitors to Court web information

2021–22: -5%
2022–23: 14%
2023–24: 3%

5% increase per year

March 31, 2026

Frequency: Annually

Annual percentage increase in the number of social media followers

2021–22: 25%
2022–23: 23%
2023–24: 24%

5% increase per year

March 31, 2026

Frequency: Annually

Percent of visitors that were “satisfied” or “very satisfied” with the Tour Program

2021–22: 99%
2022–23: 100%
2023–24: 98%

95%

March 31, 2026

Frequency: Annually

Additional information on the detailed results and performance information for the ORSCC’s program inventory is available on GC InfoBase.

Plans to achieve results

The following section describes the planned results for the administration of Canada’s final court of appeal in 2025–26.

Judges and parties are supported through effective court services and case management

In support of its Core Responsibility, the focus of the ORSCC’s work continued to be the processing and management of all cases brought to the Court.

Results we plan to achieve:

Public and stakeholders’ awareness of the Court is increased through effective communication and outreach

As the public’s interest in the Court’s cases increases and as a result of the growing visibility of the Supreme Court of Canada judges in Canada and abroad, the ORSCC must also support the Court by ensuring effective communication strategies and maintaining its outreach activities.

Results we plan to achieve:

Key risks

The ORSCC, like any other department, is faced with risks. These are regularly assessed and involve primarily IT and physical security.

IT Security (cyber threats):
unintentional or unauthorized access, use, manipulation, interruption or destruction (via electronic means) of electronic information held by the Court and the electronic and physical infrastructure used to process, communicate and/or store that information. Risk to the security and confidentiality of judicial information and data.

Mitigation strategies:

Security (persons, building, information, infrastructure):
threats to the safety of judges, staff or all building occupants, including visitors, and to the security of the building, information and infrastructure. Balancing security measures required for the protection of judges, staff and visitors with the principle of an open court.

Mitigation strategies:

Despite being stable over time, the ORSCC has ongoing risks which require constant vigilance, as identified above. In response to these risks, the ORSCC is continuing to implement enhanced security measures at the Court – both physical and IT security. These investments enable the ORSCC to increase its security posture and to properly address security vulnerabilities.

Planned resources to achieve results
Table [3]: Planned resources to achieve results for the administration of Canada’s final court of appeal

Table [3] provides a summary of the planned spending and full-time equivalents required to achieve results.

Table [3]: Planned resources to achieve results for the administration of Canada’s final court of appeal
Resource Planned
Spending $32,989,515
Full-time equivalents 159

Complete financial and human resources information for the ORSCC’s program inventory is available on GC InfoBase.

Gender-based analysis plus

In relation to ORSCC’s core responsibility, which is the administration of Canada’s final court of appeal, the following are the organizational highlights for 2025–26:

United Nations 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and the UN Sustainable Development Goals

In working towards achieving a sustainable future, the ORSCC is contributing to the following Sustainable Development Goals:

More information on the ORSCC’s contributions to Canada’s Federal Implementation Plan on the 2030 Agenda and the Federal sustainable development strategy can be found in our Departmental sustainable development strategy.

Program inventory

The administration of Canada’s final court of appeal is supported by the following programs:

Additional information related to the program inventory for the administration of Canada’s final court of appeal is available on the Results page on GC InfoBase.

Description

Internal services are the services that are provided within a department so that it can meet its corporate obligations and deliver its programs. There are 10 categories of internal services:

Plans to achieve results

This section presents details on how the department plans to achieve results and meet targets for internal services.

Internal services support the Court by providing timely and responsive services that are effective and efficient as per established service standards. Some key initiatives planned for 2025–26 are:

Planned resources to achieve results
Table [4]: Planned resources to achieve results for internal services this year

Table [4] provides a summary of the planned spending and full-time equivalents required to achieve results.

Table [4]: Planned resources to achieve results for internal services this year
Resource Planned
Spending $17,026,007
Full-time equivalents 96

Complete financial and human resources information for the ORSCC’s program inventory is available on GC InfoBase.

Planning for contracts awarded to Indigenous businesses

Government of Canada departments are to meet a target of awarding at least 5% of the total value of contracts to Indigenous businesses each year. This commitment is to be fully implemented by the end of 2024–25.

ORSCC was a phase 3 department, having to achieve the minimum 5% target by the end of 2024–25. Over the last few years, procurement officers and project authorities have worked hard to identify opportunities where contracts could be awarded to Indigenous businesses. The ORSCC uses the Indigenous Business Directory as the primary source of information for Indigenous vendors by commodity groupings. While a lot of progress has been made, Deputy Head approved exceptions are required for the following areas in light of the nature of the ORSCC’s operations:

Table [5]: Percentage of contracts planned and awarded to Indigenous businesses

Table [5] presents the current, actual results with forecasted and planned results for the total percentage of contracts the department awarded to Indigenous businesses.

Table [5]: Percentage of contracts planned and awarded to Indigenous businesses
5% reporting field 2023–24 actual result 2024–25 forecasted result 2025–26 planned result

Total percentage of contracts with Indigenous businesses

n/a 5% 5%

Planned spending and human resources

This section provides an overview of the ORSCC’s planned spending and human resources for the next three fiscal years and compares planned spending for 2025–26 with actual spending from previous years.

Spending

This section presents an overview of the department’s planned expenditures from 2022–23 to 2027–28.

Budgetary performance summary

Table [6]: Three-year spending summary for core responsibility and internal services (dollars)

Table [6] presents how much money the ORSCC spent over the past three years to carry out its core responsibility and for internal services. Amounts for the current fiscal year are forecasted based on spending to date.

Table [6]: Three-year spending summary for core responsibility and internal services (dollars)
Core responsibility and internal services 2022–23 actual expenditures 2023–24 actual expenditures 2024–25 forecast spending
The administration of Canada’s final court of appeal $28,864,505 $31,247,610 $33,615,102
Internal services $14,689,227 $17,114,215 $16,576,877

Total

$43,553,732

$48,361,825

$50,191,979

Analysis of the past three years of spending

The ORSCC’s spending increase of $4,808,093 between 2022–23 and 2023–24 is largely due to adjustments to collective agreements and investments in Security, Communications and Outreach, Corporate Services and Information Technology Systems. The ORSCC’s forecast spending increase of $1,830,154 between 2023–24 and 2024–25 is mostly due to adjustments to collective agreements, increases in Statutory authorities and other general increases in forecasted spending.

More financial information from previous years is available on the Finances section of GC Infobase.

Table [7]: Planned three-year spending on core responsibility and internal services (dollars)

Table [7] presents how much money ORSCC’s plans to spend over the next three years to carry out its core responsibility and for internal services.

Table [7]: Planned three-year spending on core responsibility and internal services (dollars)
Core responsibility and internal services 2025–26 planned spending 2026–27 planned spending 2027–28 planned spending
The administration of Canada’s final court of appeal $32,989,515 $33,312,902 $33,271,764
Internal services $17,026,007 $18,983,647 $17,370,191

Total

$50,015,522

$52,296,549

$50,641,955

Analysis of the next three years of spending

A one-time increase in planned spending is expected in 2026–27 as a result of the West Memorial Building (WMB) move.

More detailed financial information on planned spending is available on the Finances section of GC Infobase.

Funding

This section provides an overview of the department’s voted and statutory funding for its core responsibility and for internal services. For further information on funding authorities, consult the Government of Canada budgets and expenditures.

Graph [1]: Approved funding (statutory and voted) over a six-year period

Graph [1] summarizes the department’s approved voted and statutory funding from 2022–23 to 2027–28.

Graph [1]
Text description of graph [1]
Summary of the department's approved voted and statutory funding from 2022–23 to 2027–28
Fiscal year Total Voted Statutory
2022–23 $43,553,732 $30,937,835 $12,615,897
2023–24 $48,361,825 $34,782,562 $13,579,263
2024–25 $50,191,979 $36,210,388 $13,981,591
2025–26 $50,015,522 $35,457,459 $14,558,063
2026–27 $52,296,549 $37,407,241 $14,889,308
2027–28 $50,641,955 $35,504,883 $15,137,072
Analysis of statutory and voted funding over a six-year period

The increase noted from 2023–24 is largely due to funding received to invest in Security, Communications and Outreach, Corporate Services and Information Technology as well as adjustments to collective agreements. The one-time increase reflected in 2026–27 stems from funding reprofiled for the purpose of the WMB move.

For further information on ORSCC’s departmental appropriations, consult the 2025–26 Main Estimates.

Future-oriented condensed statement of operations

The future-oriented condensed statement of operations provides an overview of the ORSCC’s operations for 2024–25 to 2025–26.

Table [8]: Future-oriented condensed statement of operations for the year ended March 31, 2026 (dollars)

Table [8] summarizes the expenses and revenues which net to the cost of operations before government funding for 2024–25 to 2025–26. The forecast and planned amounts in this statement of operations were prepared on an accrual basis. The forecast and planned amounts presented in other sections of the Departmental Plan were prepared on an expenditure basis. Amounts may therefore differ.

Table [8]: Future-oriented condensed statement of operations for the year ended March 31, 2026 (dollars)
Financial information 2024–25 forecast results 2025–26 planned results

Difference
(planned results minus forecasted)

Total expenses $59,771,031 $60,832,201 $1,061,170
Total revenues $733 $15,227 $14,494
Net cost of operations before government funding $59,770,298 $60,816,974 $1,046,676
Analysis of forecasted and planned results

The variance between forecast and planned results in the table above in mainly due to an increase in services provided without charge from other government departments, an increase in the Employee Benefits Plan (EBP) rate, as well as temporary funding to prepare for the West Memorial Building move.

A more detailed Future-oriented statement of operations and associated notes for 2025–26, including a reconciliation of the net cost of operations with the requested authorities, is available on the Supreme Court of Canada’s website.

Human resources

This section presents an overview of the department’s actual and planned human resources from 2022–23 to 2027–28.

Table [9]: Actual human resources for core responsibility and internal services

Table [9] shows a summary of human resources, in full-time equivalents, for the ORSCC’s core responsibility and for its internal services for the previous three fiscal years. Human resources for the current fiscal year are forecasted based on year to date.

Table [9]: Actual human resources for core responsibility and internal services
Core responsibility and internal services 2022–23 actual full-time equivalents 2023–24 actual full-time equivalents 2024–25 forecasted full-time equivalents
The administration of Canada’s final court of appeal 147 150 158
Internal services 78 85 98

Total

225

235

256

Analysis of human resources over the last three years

The increase in full-time equivalents (FTEs) over the last three years is mainly attributable to the creation of new positions to support enhancements to the Security, Communication and Outreach, Corporate Services and Information Technology Systems.

Table [10]: Human resources planning summary for core responsibility and internal services

Table [10] shows information on human resources, in full-time equivalents, for each of the ORSCC’s core responsibility and for its internal services planned for the next three years.

Table [10]: Human resources planning summary for core responsibility and internal services
Core responsibility and internal services 2025–26 planned full-time equivalents 2026–27 planned full-time equivalents 2027–28 planned full-time equivalents
The administration of Canada’s final court of appeal 159 159 159
Internal services 96 96 96

Total

255

255

255

Analysis of human resources for the next three years

FTEs are expected to remain relatively stable over the next three fiscal years.


Corporate information

Departmental profile

Appropriate minister(s): The Honourable Sean Fraser, P.C., M.P.

Institutional head: Chantal Carbonneau

Ministerial portfolio: Justice

Enabling instrument(s):
Supreme Court Act (R.S.C., 1985, c. S-26)
Judges Act (R.S.C., 1985, c. J-1)

Year of incorporation / commencement: 1875

Organizational contact information

Mailing address

Supreme Court of Canada Building
301 Wellington Street
Ottawa, Ontario
K1A 0J1

Telephone: 1-888-551-1185
Fax: (613) 996-3063
Email: reception@scc-csc.ca
Website: https://www.scc-csc.ca/

Chantal Carbonneau - Registrar
Telephone: (613) 947-8608
Email: reception@scc-csc.ca

Cristina Damiani - Deputy Registrar
Telephone: (613) 996-7521
Email: reception@scc-csc.ca

Barbara Kincaid - General Counsel and Director General, Court Operations Sector
Telephone: (613) 996-7721
Email: law-droit@scc-csc.ca

Catherine Laforce - Director General and Chief Financial Officer, Corporate Services Sector
Telephone: (613) 947-0682
Email: Catherine.Laforce@scc-csc.ca

Michel Gallant - Executive Director, Judicial Support and Protocol Services Sector
Telephone: (613) 996-4841
Email: Michel.Gallant@scc-csc.ca


Supplementary information tables

The following supplementary information tables are available on the ORSCC’s website:

Information on the ORSCC’s departmental sustainable development strategy can be found on Supreme Court of Canada’s website.


Federal tax expenditures

The ORSCC’s Departmental Plan does not include information on tax expenditures.

The tax system can be used to achieve public policy objectives through the application of special measures such as low tax rates, exemptions, deductions, deferrals and credits. The Department of Finance Canada publishes cost estimates and projections for these measures each year in the Report on Federal Tax Expenditures.

This report also provides detailed background information on tax expenditures, including descriptions, objectives, historical information and references to related federal spending programs as well as evaluations and GBA Plus of tax expenditures.


appropriation (crédit)
Any authority of Parliament to pay money out of the Consolidated Revenue Fund.
budgetary expenditures (dépenses budgétaires)
Operating and capital expenditures; transfer payments to other levels of government, departments or individuals; and payments to Crown corporations.
core responsibility (responsabilité essentielle)
An enduring function or role performed by a department. The intentions of the department with respect to a core responsibility are reflected in one or more related departmental results that the department seeks to contribute to or influence.
Departmental Plan (plan ministériel)
A report on the plans and expected performance of an appropriated department over a 3year period. Departmental Plans are usually tabled in Parliament each spring.
departmental result (résultat ministériel)
A consequence or outcome that a department seeks to achieve. A departmental result is often outside departments’ immediate control, but it should be influenced by program-level outcomes.
departmental result indicator (indicateur de résultat ministériel)
A quantitative measure of progress on a departmental result.
departmental results framework (cadre ministériel des résultats)
A framework that connects the department’s core responsibilities to its departmental results and departmental result indicators.
Departmental Results Report (rapport sur les résultats ministériels)
A report on a department’s actual accomplishments against the plans, priorities and expected results set out in the corresponding Departmental Plan.
full-time equivalent (équivalent temps plein)
A measure of the extent to which an employee represents a full person-year charge against a departmental budget. For a particular position, the full-time equivalent figure is the ratio of number of hours the person actually works divided by the standard number of hours set out in the person’s collective agreement.
gender-based analysis plus (GBA Plus) (analyse comparative entre les sexes plus [ACS Plus])
Is an analytical tool used to support the development of responsive and inclusive policies, programs, and other initiatives. GBA Plus is a process for understanding who is impacted by the issue or opportunity being addressed by the initiative; identifying how the initiative could be tailored to meet diverse needs of the people most impacted; and anticipating and mitigating any barriers to accessing or benefitting from the initiative. GBA Plus is an intersectional analysis that goes beyond biological (sex) and socio-cultural (gender) differences to consider other factors, such as age, disability, education, ethnicity, economic status, geography (including rurality), language, race, religion, and sexual orientation.

Using GBA Plus involves taking a gender- and diversity-sensitive approach to our work. Considering all intersecting identity factors as part of GBA Plus, not only sex and gender, is a Government of Canada commitment.

government priorities (priorités gouvernementales)
For the purpose of the 2025–26 Departmental Plan, government priorities are the high-level themes outlining the government’s agenda in the most recent Speech from the Throne.
horizontal initiative (initiative horizontale)
An initiative where two or more federal departments are given funding to pursue a shared outcome, often linked to a government priority.
Indigenous business (entreprise autochtones)
For the purpose of the Directive on the Management of Procurement Appendix E: Mandatory Procedures for Contracts Awarded to Indigenous Businesses and the Government of Canada’s commitment that a mandatory minimum target of 5% of the total value of contracts is awarded to Indigenous businesses, a department that meets the definition and requirements as defined by the Indigenous Business Directory.
non budgetary expenditures (dépenses non budgétaires)
Non-budgetary authorities that comprise assets and liabilities transactions for loans, investments and advances, or specified purpose accounts, that have been established under specific statutes or under non-statutory authorities in the Estimates and elsewhere. Non-budgetary transactions are those expenditures and receipts related to the government’s financial claims on, and obligations to, outside parties. These consist of transactions in loans, investments and advances; in cash and accounts receivable; in public money received or collected for specified purposes; and in all other assets and liabilities. Other assets and liabilities, not specifically defined in G to P authority codes are to be recorded to an R authority code, which is the residual authority code for all other assets and liabilities.
performance (rendement)
What a department did with its resources to achieve its results, how well those results compare to what the department intended to achieve, and how well lessons learned have been identified.
performance indicator (indicateur de rendement)
A qualitative or quantitative means of measuring an output or outcome, with the intention of gauging the performance of an department, program, policy or initiative respecting expected results.
plan (plan)
The articulation of strategic choices, which provides information on how a department intends to achieve its priorities and associated results. Generally, a plan will explain the logic behind the strategies chosen and tend to focus on actions that lead to the expected result.
planned spending (dépenses prévues)
For Departmental Plans and Departmental Results Reports, planned spending refers to those amounts presented in Main Estimates.

A department is expected to be aware of the authorities that it has sought and received. The determination of planned spending is a departmental responsibility, and departments must be able to defend the expenditure and accrual numbers presented in their Departmental Plans and Departmental Results Reports.

program (programme)
Individual or groups of services, activities or combinations thereof that are managed together within the department and focus on a specific set of outputs, outcomes or service levels.
program inventory (répertoire des programmes)
Identifies all the department’s programs and describes how resources are organized to contribute to the department’s core responsibilities and results.
result (résultat)
A consequence attributed, in part, to a department, policy, program or initiative. Results are not within the control of a single department, policy, program or initiative; instead they are within the area of the department’s influence.
statutory expenditures (dépenses législatives)
Expenditures that Parliament has approved through legislation other than appropriation acts. The legislation sets out the purpose of the expenditures and the terms and conditions under which they may be made.
target (cible)
A measurable performance or success level that a department, program or initiative plans to achieve within a specified time period. Targets can be either quantitative or qualitative.
voted expenditures (dépenses votées)
Expenditures that Parliament approves annually through an appropriation act. The vote wording becomes the governing conditions under which these expenditures may be made.

Footnote

Footnote 1

In 2023–24, the time lapse between the hearing of an appeal and the date when leave to appeal was granted or the notice of appeal as of right was file increased to 45 weeks, largely due to the impact of the hearing of one appeal that, in an unusual set of judicial circumstances, was concluded three years after leave was granted.

Return to footnote 1 referrer

Date modified: 2026-01-29