Renseignements sur les dossiers

Registre

Les jugements sur les demandes d’autorisation d’appel sont rendus par la Cour, mais ne sont pas nécessairement unanimes.

Liste des procédures

Date	Procédure	Document déposé par (si applicable)
1995-08-21	Appel fermé
1995-08-21	Fermer le dossier de l'autorisation d'appel
1995-08-16	Dossier retourné au registraire de la Cour d'appel
1995-08-16	Correspondance (envoyée par la Cour) à, sent to Ministry of the A.G. (Toronto, ON) enclosing their record
1995-08-14	Copie du jugement formel en voie de préparation, Robert J. Sharpe (Toronto, ON)
1995-08-14	Copie du jugement formel en voie de préparation, Blake, Cassels & Graydon (Toronto, ON)
1995-08-14	Copie du jugement formel en voie de préparation, Blake, Cassels & Graydon (Ottawa, ON)
1995-08-14	Copie du jugement formel en voie de préparation, Burke-Robertson
1995-08-14	Copie du jugement formel en voie de préparation, Gowling, Strathy & Henderson (Ottawa, ON)
1995-08-14	Copie du jugement formel en voie de préparation, Scott & Aylen (Ottawa, ON)
1995-08-14	Copie du jugement formel en voie de préparation, Nelligan, Power (Ottawa, ON)
1995-08-11	Jugement formel envoyé au registraire de la cour d'appel et toutes les parties, Ontario (Toronto)
1995-07-21	Avis de dépôt du jugement envoyé à toutes les parties, Blake, Cassels & Graydon (Toronto, ON)
1995-07-21	Avis de dépôt du jugement envoyé à toutes les parties, Blake, Cassels & Graydon (Ottawa, ON)
1995-07-21	Avis de dépôt du jugement envoyé à toutes les parties, Gowling, Strathy & Henderson (Ottawa, ON)
1995-07-21	Avis de dépôt du jugement envoyé à toutes les parties, Scott & Aylen (Ottawa, ON)
1995-07-21	Avis de dépôt du jugement envoyé à toutes les parties, Burke-Robertson
1995-07-21	Avis de dépôt du jugement envoyé à toutes les parties, Robert J. Sharpe (Toronto, ON)
1995-07-21	Avis de dépôt du jugement envoyé à toutes les parties, Nelligan, Power (Ottawa, ON)
1995-07-20	Jugement rendu sur l'appel, LaF L'HD G Co McL Ia Ma, Le pourvoi est rejeté avec dépens. Rejeté(e), avec dépens
1995-03-06	Divers, transcripts received and distributed to the judges (283 pages)
1995-02-20	Preuve de signification, of factum in response to the motion to adduce fresh evidence
1995-02-20	Audition de l'appel, 1995-02-20, LaF L'HD G Co McL Ia Ma Décision en délibéré
1995-02-20	Décision sur requête pour déposer de nouveaux éléments de preuve, LaF L'HD G Co McL Ia Ma Accordée, aucune ordonnance relative aux dépens
1995-02-20	Audition de requête pour déposer de nouveaux éléments de preuve, 1995-02-20, LaF L'HD G Co McL Ia Ma
1995-02-20	Présentation de requête pour déposer de nouveaux éléments de preuve, 1995-02-20, LaF L'HD G Co McL Ia Ma
1995-02-20	Divers, to note 8 copies of EXCERPT of Cross-Examination.. .. given in Court	Church of Scientology of Toronto
1995-02-20	Divers, to note 8 copies of HISTORY OF CHARTER SUBMISSIONS given in Court	Church of Scientology of Toronto
1995-02-20	Divers, to note 8 copies of COMPENDIUM OF THE APPELLANT given in Court	Morris Manning
1995-02-20	Divers, to note 8 copies of "Gazette v. Snyder" given in Court	Casey Hill
1995-02-17	Divers, 20 copies of AID TO ORAL ARGUMENT OF THE RESPONDENT CASEY HILL (red book)	Casey Hill
1995-02-17	Divers, 24 copies of FACTUM OF THE RESPONDENT'S CASEY HILL IN RESPONSE TO THE MOTION TO ADDUCE FRESH EVIDENCE BROUGHT BY THE CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY OF TORONTO	Casey Hill
1995-02-17	Divers, 24 copies of FACTUM OF THE RESPONDENT CASEY HILL (IN SUPPORT) ON THE MOTION TO ADDUCE FRESH EVIDENCE BROUGHT BY CASEY HILL	Casey Hill
1995-02-17	Correspondance (envoyée par la Cour) à, from Lori Sterling to M. Larmour re: letter dated Feb. 16/95 - motion to introduce fresh evidence; the appellant seeks to rely on part of the decision which sets out a portion of the submission by the Min. of the Att. Gen. for Ont. (fax copy) sent to LaF
1995-02-17	Preuve de signification, of book of authorities
1995-02-17	Correspondance (envoyée par la Cour) à, from Gowling, Strathy re: duration of argument
1995-02-16	Mémoire supplémentaire, 24 copies of FACTUM OF THE APPELLANT, CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION FOR LEAVE PERMITTING THE RECEIPT OF FURTHER EVIDENCE, with service	Church of Scientology of Toronto
1995-02-16	Mémoire supplémentaire, 24 copies of FACTUM OF THE APPELLANT, CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY IN RESPONSE TO MOTION TO ADDUCE FRESH EVIDENCE BROUGHT BY S. CASEY HILL, with service	Church of Scientology of Toronto
1995-02-16	Documentation supplémentaire, 10 copies of SUPPLEMENTARY BOOK OF AUTHORITIES OF THE CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY OF TORONTO	Church of Scientology of Toronto
1995-02-16	Divers, 10 copies of judgment of New York Times Co. v. Sullivan (TO BE REPLACED IN VOL. 3, TAB 52 OF THE RESPONDENT'S BRIEF OF AUTHORITIES) (TO BE DISTRIBUTED TO THE JUDGES)	Casey Hill
1995-02-16	Correspondance (envoyée par la Cour) à, from M. Somerville to M. Larmour re: duration of argument (fax copy)
1995-02-15	Preuve de signification, of the Book of Authorities of Att. Gen. for Ontario (fax copy) (Nancy Bray)
1995-02-15	Recueil de sources, 10 copies of vol. 1 of 2 (joint with interveners Media Coalition and Can. Civil Liverties)	Writers' Union of Canada
1995-02-15	Dossier de la cour de première instance, 1 box (containing 1 video cassette and TRIAL BRIEF OF THE PLAINTIFF)
1995-02-15	Décision sur requête diverse, for leave to file a factum without marginal numbering, Reg Accordée, aucune ordonnance relative aux dépens
1995-02-15	Audition de requête diverse, 1995-02-15, for leave to file a factum without marginal numbering, Reg
1995-02-15	Présentation de requête diverse, 1995-02-15, for leave to file a factum without marginal numbering, Reg
1995-02-15	Décision sur requête diverse, for leave to file the factum without marginal numbering, Reg Accordée, aucune ordonnance relative aux dépens
1995-02-15	Audition de requête diverse, 1995-02-15, for leave to file the factum without marginal numbering, Reg
1995-02-15	Présentation de requête diverse, 1995-02-15, for leave to file the factum without marginal numbering, Reg
1995-02-14	Recueil de sources, 10 copies, with service	Procureur général de l'Ontario
1995-02-14	Correspondance (envoyée par la Cour) à, (by fax) from Tory, Tory; re: exhibits from the trial will be courriered and must be in the Court room at the hearing of the appeal
1995-02-14	Correspondance (envoyée par la Cour) à, (by fax) from Weir & Foulds; re: Bryan Finlay, Q.C . and Christopher J. Tzekas will take one hour for submission
1995-02-14	Preuve de signification, 1 copy of factum in reply to the A.G. Ontario
1995-02-14	Mémoire en réplique sur un appel, 24 copies (REPLY TO THE FACTUM OF THE INTERVENER, ATT. GEN. FOR ONTARIO) (see order Jan. 26/95), with service	Morris Manning
1995-02-13	Correspondance (envoyée par la Cour) à, from James Minnes re: duration of argument for the respondent
1995-02-13	Preuve de signification, of the notice of motion and affidavit of Brian MacLeod Rogers (Susan Messenger)
1995-02-13	Preuve de signification, of the motion record of S. Casey Hill (Tim Costigan)
1995-02-13	Preuve de signification, of the motion and affidavit of K. Roach (Jeanette Williams)
1995-02-13	Réponse à requête diverse, of Gowling, Strathy (Marc Somerville) re: motion to accept the intervener's factum, Can. Daily Newspaper in its present form (letter form)	Church of Scientology of Toronto
1995-02-13	Réponse à requête diverse, of Weir, Foulds (C. Tzekas) re: motion to accept the intervener, Can. Daily Newspaper in its present form (letter form)	Morris Manning
1995-02-13	Réponse à requête diverse, of Robert P. Armstrong re: to accept the intervener's factum, Can. Daily Newspaper et al, in its present form (letter form)	Casey Hill
1995-02-13	Affidavit, of Brian MacLeod Rogers (re: to accept the intervener's factum in its present form)	Canadian Daily Newspaper Association
1995-02-13	Avis de requête diverse, (to accept the factum in its present form without every tenth lines numbered)	Canadian Daily Newspaper Association
1995-02-13	Réponse à requête diverse, of Bryan Finlay re: motion to accept the intervener's factum, Can. Civil Liberties in its present form (letter form)	Morris Manning
1995-02-13	Réponse à requête diverse, of Tory, Tory re: motion to accept the intervener's factum, Can. Civil Liberties, in its present form (letter form)	Casey Hill
1995-02-13	Réponse à requête diverse, of Gowling, Strathy (letter form) for factum of the Int. Canadian Civil Liberties accepted in its present form	Church of Scientology of Toronto
1995-02-13	Affidavit, of Kent Roach re: motion to accept the intervener's factum in its present form without every tenth lines numbered)	Canadian Civil Liberties Association
1995-02-13	Avis de requête diverse, (to file the intervener's factum, Canadian Civil Liberties in its present form, without every tenth line)	Canadian Civil Liberties Association
1995-02-13	Affidavit, of Christopher James Tzekas re: motion to accept the appellant's factum in its present form - book form - 2 copies, with service	Morris Manning
1995-02-13	Avis de requête diverse, 2 copies (TO ACCEPT THE APPELLANT'S FACTUM IN ITS PRESENT FORM, WITHOUT EVERY TENTH LINE NUMBERED) - BOOK FORM, with service	Morris Manning
1995-02-13	Mémoire de l'intimé(e) sur la requête pour déposer de nouvelles preuves, 11 copies (IN RESPONSE TO THE AFFIDAVIT OF VICTOR URBAN IN SCIENTOLOGY'S MOTION TO ADDUCE FRESH EVIDENCE - see motion dated Jan. 30/95) (TO BE DISTRIBUTED TO THE JUDGES FOR THE HEARING OF THE APPEAL)	Casey Hill
1995-02-13	Requête pour déposer de nouveaux éléments de preuve, 10 copies (TO BE HEARD AT THE HEARING OF THE APPEAL)	Casey Hill
1995-02-13	Divers, 12 copies of FRESH EVIDENCE OF THE RESPONDENT, S. CASEY HILL - SEALED IN AN ENVELOPE - TO BE SENT TO THE JUDGES	Casey Hill
1995-02-13	Mémoire en réplique sur un appel, 24 copies IN REPLY TO THE FACTUM OF THE INT., THE ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR ONTARIO (see order dated Jan. 26/95)	Church of Scientology of Toronto
1995-02-10	Mémoire supplémentaire, 24 copies of REPLY FACTUM OF THE RESPONDENT (see order dated Jan. 26/95)	Casey Hill
1995-02-10	Documentation supplémentaire, 10 copies of SUPPLEMENTARY BRIEF OF AUTHORITIES	Casey Hill
1995-02-10	Correspondance (envoyée par la Cour) à, from James Minnes re: duration of argument (fax copy)
1995-02-06	Preuve de signification, of factum
1995-02-06	Mémoire de l'intervenant(e), 24 copies (see order dated Jan. 26/95), with service	Procureur général de l'Ontario
1995-02-06	Recueil de sources, 10 copies of BRANDEIS BRIEF OF THE INTERVENER, ATT. GEN. FOR ONTARIO	Procureur général de l'Ontario
1995-02-03	Mémoire de l'intervenant(e), 24 copies (motion to accept in its present form without lines numbered requested), with service	Canadian Civil Liberties Association
1995-02-03	Recueil de sources, 10 copies of vols. 1 to 5	Morris Manning
1995-02-03	Recueil de sources, 10 copies of vols. 1 to 3	Casey Hill
1995-02-03	Mémoire de l'intimé(e), 25 copies	Casey Hill
1995-02-03	Mémoire de l'intervenant(e), 24 copies, with service	Writers' Union of Canada
1995-02-03	Mémoire de l'intervenant(e), 24 copies THE MEDIA COALITION (I05 to I09) (motion to accept in its present form without lines numbered requested), with service	Canadian Daily Newspaper Association
1995-01-31	Avis de changement de procureur, formerly represented by Stikeman, Elliott has appointed Weir & Foulds as solicitors	Morris Manning
1995-01-31	Mémoire de l'appelant(e), 25 copies (motion to accept in its present form without lines numbered requested), with service	Morris Manning
1995-01-30	Mémoire de l'appelant(e) sur la requête pour déposer de nouvelles preuves, 10 copies (TO BE HEARD AT THE HEARING OF THE APPEAL), with service	Church of Scientology of Toronto
1995-01-26	Correspondance (envoyée par la Cour) à, (by fax) from Stikeman, Elliott; re: share a number of concerns expressed by Mr. Sommerville. Will want to file a reply factum
1995-01-26	Décision sur requête en autorisation d'intervention, L'HD, the factum of the intervenor to be filed by Feb 6/95 with an argument of 20 pages and oral hearing of 20 minutes. The appellant is allowed to file a reply if need be by Feb. 13/95. The respondent will be allowed to file his factum by Feb 3/95 and a reply if need be by Feb 10/95 Accordée, aucune ordonnance relative aux dépens
1995-01-26	Audition de requête en autorisation d'intervention, 1995-01-26, L'HD
1995-01-26	Présentation de requête en autorisation d'intervention, 1995-01-26, L'HD
1995-01-26	Décision sur requête en prorogation de délai, for leave to intervene, L'HD Accordée, aucune ordonnance relative aux dépens
1995-01-26	Audition de requête en prorogation de délai, 1995-01-26, for leave to intervene, L'HD
1995-01-26	Présentation de requête en prorogation de délai, 1995-01-26, for leave to intervene, L'HD
1995-01-25	Mémoire de l'appelant(e), 24 copies	Church of Scientology of Toronto
1995-01-25	Correspondance (envoyée par la Cour) à, (by fax) from Tory, Tory; re: not opposing the application of A.G. Ontario. May request to file a reply factum
1995-01-25	Correspondance (envoyée par la Cour) à, (by fax) from Gowling; re: takes no position with regard to the request to present oral argument of the A.G. Ontario. Will request permission to file a reply factum
1995-01-24	Correspondance (envoyée par la Cour) à, from M. Somerville to M. Larmour re: Church of Scientology of Toronto's position on the motion to intervene of Att. Gen. for Ontario (fax copy)
1995-01-20	Dossier conjoint certifié, OF THE SUPPLEMENTARY CASE ON APPEAL, with service	Morris Manning
1995-01-20	Affidavit, 1 copy; Hart Schwartz, with service	Procureur général de l'Ontario
1995-01-20	Affidavit, for leave to intervene; Hart Schwartz; 1 copy, with service	Procureur général de l'Ontario
1995-01-20	Requête en prorogation de délai, for leave to intervene, with service	Procureur général de l'Ontario
1995-01-20	Requête en autorisation d'intervention, 1 copy, with service	Procureur général de l'Ontario
1995-01-18	Documentation supplémentaire, Case on Appeal ADDENDUM 24 copies, with service	Morris Manning
1995-01-18	Décision sur requête en autorisation d'intervention, is granted without costs. The intervenor will be allowed to file a factum of no more than 20 pages on or before Feb 3/95 and will have a period of 30 minutes to present oral argument., L'HD Accordée, aucune ordonnance relative aux dépens
1995-01-18	Audition de requête en autorisation d'intervention, 1995-01-18, is granted without costs. The intervenor will be allowed to file a factum of no more than 20 pages on or before Feb 3/95 and will have a period of 30 minutes to present oral argument., L'HD
1995-01-18	Présentation de requête en autorisation d'intervention, 1995-01-18, is granted without costs. The intervenor will be allowed to file a factum of no more than 20 pages on or before Feb 3/95 and will have a period of 30 minutes to present oral argument., L'HD
1995-01-18	Décision sur requête en autorisation d'intervention, is granted without costs. The intervenor will be allowed to file a factum of no more than 20 pages on or before Feb 3/95 and will be given a period of 15 minutes to present oral argument, L'HD Accordée, aucune ordonnance relative aux dépens
1995-01-18	Audition de requête en autorisation d'intervention, 1995-01-18, is granted without costs. The intervenor will be allowed to file a factum of no more than 20 pages on or before Feb 3/95 and will be given a period of 15 minutes to present oral argument, L'HD
1995-01-18	Présentation de requête en autorisation d'intervention, 1995-01-18, is granted without costs. The intervenor will be allowed to file a factum of no more than 20 pages on or before Feb 3/95 and will be given a period of 15 minutes to present oral argument, L'HD
1995-01-18	Décision sur requête en autorisation d'intervention, is granted without costs. The intervenor will be allowed to file a factum of no more than 20 pages in all on or before Feb 3/95 and will have a period of 15 minutes in all to present oral argument, L'HD Accordée, aucune ordonnance relative aux dépens
1995-01-18	Audition de requête en autorisation d'intervention, 1995-01-18, is granted without costs. The intervenor will be allowed to file a factum of no more than 20 pages in all on or before Feb 3/95 and will have a period of 15 minutes in all to present oral argument, L'HD
1995-01-18	Présentation de requête en autorisation d'intervention, 1995-01-18, is granted without costs. The intervenor will be allowed to file a factum of no more than 20 pages in all on or before Feb 3/95 and will have a period of 15 minutes in all to present oral argument, L'HD
1995-01-18	Avis d'audition, With service	Morris Manning
1995-01-17	Divers, to note Respondent's Motion Record (Motions for Leave to intervene), with service	Casey Hill
1995-01-17	Divers, to note the Factum of S. Casey Hill (motion for leave to Intervene), with service	Casey Hill
1995-01-17	Divers, to note the Respondent's Supplementary Motion Record (Motions for leave to intervene), with service	Casey Hill
1995-01-17	Décision sur requête pour déposer un mémoire volumineux, respondent is allowed to file a single factum of 80 pages, Reg Accordée, aucune ordonnance relative aux dépens
1995-01-17	Audition de requête pour déposer un mémoire volumineux, 1995-01-17, respondent is allowed to file a single factum of 80 pages, Reg
1995-01-17	Présentation de requête pour déposer un mémoire volumineux, 1995-01-17, respondent is allowed to file a single factum of 80 pages, Reg
1995-01-17	Affidavit, (by fax) of A. Alan Borovoy re: motions for leave to intervene on Jan. 18/95	Canadian Civil Liberties Association
1995-01-13	Audition de la requête pour déposer de nouvelles preuves est fixée
1995-01-13	Audition d'appel mise au rôle, 1995-02-20 Décision en délibéré
1995-01-10	Dossier conjoint, 12 copies of TRIAL transcript vol. I to XIII and APPEAL BOOK vol. I to VII (see order of Registrar of Dec. 22/94)	Morris Manning
1995-01-10	Correspondance (envoyée par la Cour) à, from David Brown to M. Larmour re: Mr. Manning consents to the 3 applications for intervention, BUT do object to Mr. Hill's request for leave to file an 80 page factum (do not object to 55 page factum) - fax copy
1995-01-09	Affidavit, not exceeding 80 pages in length (of John P. Koch) (bookform), with service	Casey Hill
1995-01-09	Requête pour déposer un mémoire volumineux, not exceeding 80 pages in length (bookform), with service	Casey Hill
1995-01-09	Dossier de la cour d'appel, 2 boxes containing the appeal books and the trial transcript
1995-01-06	Documentation supplémentaire, CASE ON APPEAL 23 copies	Morris Manning
1994-12-23	Affidavit, 2 copies; A. Alan Borovoy, with service	Canadian Civil Liberties Association
1994-12-23	Requête en autorisation d'intervention, 2 copies, with service	Canadian Civil Liberties Association
1994-12-22	Ordonnance sur requête en réduction du nombre d'exemplaires du dossier conjoint
1994-12-22	Décision sur requête en réduction du nombre d'exemplaires du dossier conjoint, Reg, in order to avoid the proliferation of supplementary cases on appeal and to reduce the number of pages being produced, it is ordered that twelve (12) copies of the case on appeal as produced in the Court of Appeal and twenty-four (24) copies of the supplementary case on appeal be filed with the Court by January 10/95 Accordée, aucune ordonnance relative aux dépens
1994-12-22	Audition de requête en réduction du nombre d'exemplaires du dossier conjoint, 1994-12-22, Reg
1994-12-22	Présentation de requête en réduction du nombre d'exemplaires du dossier conjoint, 1994-12-22, Reg
1994-12-22	Affidavit, of Michael R. Doody (joint with Can. Community Newspapers Ass. et al) - 2 copies - book form, with service	Canadian Daily Newspaper Association
1994-12-22	Requête en autorisation d'intervention, 2 copies (joint with Can. Community Newspapers Ass. et al) - book form, with service	Canadian Daily Newspaper Association
1994-12-22	Divers, 2 COPIES OF BRIEF OF AUTHORITIES OF THE PROPOSED INTERVENORS, with service	Writers' Union of Canada
1994-12-22	Divers, 2 copies of FACTUM OF THE PROPOSED INTERVENORS, with service	Writers' Union of Canada
1994-12-22	Affidavit, of Pierre berton, Louise Dennys, D. S. Patterson, Anne Erickson, L. Fowlie (book form - joint with interventions by PEN Canada, Can. Ass. of Journalists, Periodical Writers Ass.), with service	Writers' Union of Canada
1994-12-22	Requête en autorisation d'intervention, 2 copies (book form - joint with PEN Canada, Can. Ass. of Journalists, Periodical Writers), with service	Writers' Union of Canada
1994-12-20	Ordonnance accordant l'autorisation d'appeler
1994-12-20	Ordonnance sur requête pour déposer de nouveaux éléments de preuve
1994-12-19	Affidavit, of the Case on Appeal; R. Ross Wells	Church of Scientology of Toronto
1994-12-19	Requête en dispense d'impression, of the Case on Appeal	Church of Scientology of Toronto
1994-12-15	Correspondance (envoyée par la Cour) à, (by fax) from Gowling; re: complete agreement with Mr. Armstrong that a full day will be needed for argument of the two appeals.
1994-12-12	Correspondance (envoyée par la Cour) à, from Peter W. Hogg; re: will intervene on behalf of Canadian Daily Newspaper Association
1994-12-09	Ordonnance accordant l'autorisation d'appeler
1994-11-29	Appel prêt pour audition, Session commençant le 1995-01-23
1994-11-21	Correspondance (envoyée par la Cour) à, sent to Kent Thomson & to Robert P. Armstrong of Tory Tory Deslauriers & Binnington (Toronto, ON) c.c. Scott & Aylen, enclosing copy of Rule 32
1994-11-21	Correspondance (envoyée par la Cour) à, sent to Stikeman, Elliott (Toronto, ON) enclosing copy of Rule 32
1994-11-21	Correspondance (envoyée par la Cour) à, sent to Gowling, Strathy & Henderson (Kitchener, ON) enclosing copy of Rule 32, cc. E. Van Bemmel
1994-11-17	Avis de dépôt du cautionnement, (1 copy), with service
1994-11-17	500 $ dépôt du cautionnement, direction #2330	Morris Manning
1994-11-17	Avis de dépôt du cautionnement, (1 copy), with service
1994-11-17	Avis d'appel, (1 copy), with service	Morris Manning
1994-11-16	500 $ dépôt du cautionnement, direction #2329	Church of Scientology of Toronto
1994-11-16	Avis d'appel, (1 copy), with service	Church of Scientology of Toronto
1994-10-28	Avis de dépôt de jugement envoyé à toutes les parties, Gowling, Strathy & Henderson (Ottawa, ON)
1994-10-28	Avis de dépôt de jugement envoyé à toutes les parties, Scott & Aylen (Ottawa, ON)
1994-10-28	Avis de dépôt de jugement envoyé à toutes les parties, Stikeman and Elliott (Ottawa, ON)
1994-10-28	Correspondance provenant de, from David Brown to M. Larmour re: would like to know if this appeal will be heard in the third week of January 1995 (fax copy)	Morris Manning
1994-10-27	Jugement de la Cour sur demande d'autorisation d'appel, JC Co Ia, Les demandes d'autorisation d'appel et la demande disant à présenter de nouveaux éléments de preuve sont accordées. Accordée, aucune ordonnance relative aux dépens
1994-10-12	Recueil de sources, 5 copies sent to CJ Co I, Oct 13/94, with service	Church of Scientology of Toronto
1994-10-07	Signification, copy of the Applicant's reply
1994-10-07	Envoi aux juges des documents de la demande d'autorisation, JC Co Ia
1994-10-06	Réplique du demandeur au mémoire de l'intimé(e), 5 copies	Church of Scientology of Toronto
1994-10-03	Ordonnance sur requête diverse, to accept leave application in its present form
1994-09-29	Preuve de signification, of response
1994-09-28	Réponse à requête diverse, for an order permitting the applicant to be excused from the printing requirements	Casey Hill
1994-09-28	Réponse de l'intimé(e) à demande d'autorisation d'appel, 5 copies, vols. 1 and 2	Casey Hill
1994-09-28	Décision sur requête diverse, to accept leave application in its present form (smaller print size), Reg Accordée, aucune ordonnance relative aux dépens
1994-09-28	Audition de requête diverse, 1994-09-28, to accept leave application in its present form (smaller print size), Reg
1994-09-28	Présentation de requête diverse, 1994-09-28, to accept leave application in its present form (smaller print size), Reg
1994-09-28	Ordonnance sur requête pour déposer un mémoire des arguments volumineux
1994-09-21	Affidavit, of R. Ross Wells (to dispense with printing requirements for the argument into the 2nd application for leave to appeal), with service	Church of Scientology of Toronto
1994-09-21	Avis de requête diverse, (to dispense with printing requirements for the argument into the 2nd application for leave to appeal), with service	Church of Scientology of Toronto
1994-09-14	Correspondance provenant de, of the Registrar to Mr. R. Ross Wells re: is letter dated Sept.7/94 advising the Court that this application raises similar issues to those in Bardyn v. Botiuk (23517)
1994-09-13	Décision sur requête pour déposer un mémoire des arguments volumineux, not exceeding 40 pages in response to the memorandum of argument filed by the applicant Morris Manning and by the applicant Church of Scientology of Toronto. Respondent shall file his response within 20 clear days from Sept 8/94, Reg Accordée, aucune ordonnance relative aux dépens
1994-09-13	Audition de requête pour déposer un mémoire des arguments volumineux, 1994-09-13, not exceeding 40 pages in response to the memorandum of argument filed by the applicant Morris Manning and by the applicant Church of Scientology of Toronto. Respondent shall file his response within 20 clear days from Sept 8/94, Reg
1994-09-13	Présentation de requête pour déposer un mémoire des arguments volumineux, 1994-09-13, not exceeding 40 pages in response to the memorandum of argument filed by the applicant Morris Manning and by the applicant Church of Scientology of Toronto. Respondent shall file his response within 20 clear days from Sept 8/94, Reg
1994-09-08	Correspondance provenant de, of R. Ross Wells (Gowling, Strathy & Henderson) to submit that if this application is granted, it would be most appropriate to have it heard with the case of Bardyn et al v. Botiuk (23517)	Church of Scientology of Toronto
1994-09-08	Requête pour déposer de nouveaux éléments de preuve, 5 copies, with service	Church of Scientology of Toronto
1994-09-08	30 $ frais de dépôt, receipt #24886	Church of Scientology of Toronto
1994-09-08	Demande d'autorisation d'appel, (SECOND APPLICATION) 5 copies (motion requested - dispense with printing requirements), with service, complété le : 1994-09-08	Church of Scientology of Toronto
1994-08-24	Correspondance provenant de, from David Brown to M. Larmour re: Mr. Hill's consent to the filing of a single memorandum by the respondent (fax copy) - original received Aug. 25/94
1994-08-24	Correspondance provenant de, from Robert Armstrong to M. Larmour re: this letter is Mr. Hill's reply to the representations of Gowling, Strathy on behalf of the Church of Scientology of Toronto (fax copy)	Casey Hill
1994-08-23	Divers, (WAIT FOR SECOND APPLICATION BY THE CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY OF TORONTO - SAME ACTION AND SAME ORDER OF THE COURT OF APPEAL)
1994-08-23	Correspondance provenant de, from Ross Wells to M. Larmour re: The Church of Scientology of Toronto takes the position that the motion by Casey Hill to file a single memorandum not exceeding 40 pages is premature due to the fact that their application for leave to appeal will be fil
1994-08-22	Affidavit, (of John P. Koch to file a memorandum not exceeding 40 pages in response to the memoranda of argument by Morris Manning and Church of Scientology of Toronto) - 2 copies - book form	Casey Hill
1994-08-22	Requête pour déposer un mémoire des arguments volumineux, (not exceeding 40 pages in response to the memorandum by Morris Manning and Church of Scientology of Toronto) - 2 copies - book form	Casey Hill
1994-06-30	Correspondance provenant de, from Robert P. Armstrong to M. Larmour re: DO NOT ACCEPT THE SUGGESTION THAT THIS CASE SHOULD BE HEARD WITH BOTIUK FILES NOS. 23510-23517-23519) (TO BE SENT WITH THE APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL)
1994-06-29	Correspondance provenant de, from David M. Brown to M. Larmour re: suggesting that if leave is granted, this case should be heard with Botiuk nos. 23510-23517-23519 (TO BE SENT WITH THE APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL)
1994-06-29	Recueil de sources, 5 copies of vol. 1 to 3	Morris Manning
1994-06-29	30 $ frais de dépôt, receipt no. 24729	Morris Manning
1994-06-29	Demande d'autorisation d'appel, (FIRST APPLICATION) 5 copies, with service, complété le : 1994-06-29	Morris Manning

Parties

Parties principales

Parties principales - Demandeurs

Nom	Rôle	Statut
Manning, Morris	Demandeur(eresse)	Actif

c.

Parties principales - Intimés

Nom	Rôle	Statut
Hill, Casey	Intimé(e)	Actif

et entre

Sous-parties (1) - Demandeurs

Nom	Rôle	Statut
Church of Scientology of Toronto	Demandeur(eresse)	Actif

c.

Sous-parties (1) - Intimés

Nom	Rôle	Statut
Hill, Casey	Intimé(e)	Actif

Autres parties

Autres parties

Nom	Rôle	Statut
Writers' Union of Canada	Intervenant(e)	Actif
PEN Canada	Intervenant(e)	Actif
Canadian Association of Journalists	Intervenant(e)	Actif
Periodical Writers Ass. of Canada and Book and Periodical Council	Intervenant(e)	Actif
Canadian Daily Newspaper Association	Intervenant(e)	Actif
Canadian Community Newspapers Associaation	Intervenant(e)	Actif
Canadian Association of Broadcasters	Intervenant(e)	Actif
Radio-Television News Directors Ass. of Canada	Intervenant(e)	Actif
Canadian Book Publishers Council & Canadian Magazine Publishers Ass. (collectively 'The Coalition')	Intervenant(e)	Actif
Canadian Civil Liberties Association	Intervenant(e)	Actif
Procureur général de l'Ontario	Intervenant(e)	Actif

Procureurs

Sommaire

Mémoires relatifs à une demande d’autorisation d’appel

Les mémoires relatifs à une demande d’autorisation d’appel seront affichés 30 jours après l’octroi de l’autorisation d’appel, sauf s’ils renferment des renseignements personnels, des renseignements visés par une obligation de non-publication ou tout autre renseignement ne faisant pas partie du dossier public. Il est également possible d’obtenir une copie d’un tel mémoire en remplissant une Demande d’accès aux documents judiciaires ou en communiquant avec le Centre des dossiers soit par courriel à l’adresse records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca, soit par téléphone au 613‑996‑7933 ou au 1-888-551-1185.

Si vous avez des questions au sujet d’un mémoire relatif à une demande d’autorisation d’appel ou si vous désirez utiliser un tel mémoire, vous êtes priés de communiquer directement avec son auteur. Le nom de cette personne figure sur la dernière page du mémoire. Les coordonnés de l’avocat se trouvent dans l’onglet « Procureurs » de cette page.

PDF téléchargeables

Liens connexes

• Accessibilité
• Restrictions

Mémoires relatifs à un appel

Les mémoires relatifs à l’appel de l’appelant, de l’intimé et celui de l’intervenant seront affichés ici au moins 2 semaines avant l’audience, à moins qu’ils ne renferment des renseignements personnels, des renseignements visés par une obligation de non-publication ou tout autre renseignement ne faisant pas partie du dossier public. Il est également possible d’obtenir une copie d’un mémoire en remplissant le formulaire de Demande d’accès aux documents judiciaires ou en communiquant avec le Centre des dossiers soit par courriel à l’adresse records-dossiers@scc-csc.ca, soit par téléphone au 613‑996‑7933 ou au 1-888-551-1185.

Si vous avez des questions au sujet d’un mémoire relatif à un appel ou si vous désirez utiliser un tel mémoire, vous êtes priés de communiquer directement avec son auteur. Le nom de cette personne et ses coordonnées figurent sur la première page du mémoire.

PDF téléchargeables

Liens connexes

• Accessibilité
• Restrictions

Diffusions Web

Non disponible.

Liens connexes

• Accessibilité
• Restrictions